Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within
the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does its work inside a
chroot; is it advisable for that to happen while already inside
‘pbuilder’s existing chroot?
not really,
Howdy all,
I'm trying to make more use of ‘pbuilder’ hooks for automating the
testing of my packages.
Does it make sense to use a hook to install and remove the package
after it is built? The plus side is this would test that the
{pre,post}{inst,rm} programs run successfully. What are the
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Does it make sense to use a hook to install and remove the package
[in a ‘pbuilder’ chroot] after it is built? The plus side is this
would test that the {pre,post}{inst,rm} programs run successfully.
What are the negatives of this approach?
I've
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 11:32 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I've been made aware of ‘piuparts’. Would it make sense to have a hook
to run this command, on the newly-built package, inside the ‘pbuilder’
chroot? How would such a hook program get access to the file name of
the binary package?
I think
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com writes:
I think you should look at the lintian hook example in
/usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples. That could possibly be copied and
modified to use piuparts.
Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within
the other? As I understand it,
5 matches
Mail list logo
