Adam Borowski writes:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:23:45AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> agreed. What about
>> 7.5~rc.2+repack
>> ?
>>
>> The full stop is ugly at my eyes, but does the work and there are worse
>> things in the world.
>
> What about rc-2+repack? A
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:23:45AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> agreed. What about
> 7.5~rc.2+repack
> ?
>
> The full stop is ugly at my eyes, but does the work and there are worse
> things in the world.
What about rc-2+repack? A matter of taste but I'd call this somewhat less
ugly.
--
Mattia Rizzolo writes:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:26:09PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Santiago Vila writes:
>> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> >> dpkg --compare-versions 7.5~rc+repack lt 7.5~rc2+repack && echo
>> >> lt
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:26:09PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> dpkg --compare-versions 7.5~rc+repack lt 7.5~rc2+repack && echo lt ||
> >> echo ge
> >> ge
> >>
> >> What is the best
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> dpkg --compare-versions 7.5~rc+repack lt 7.5~rc2+repack && echo lt || echo
>> ge
>> ge
>>
>> What is the best way to fix this?
>
> The best way I don't know, but I would put the RC number
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> my package "saods9" has currently a RC release in experimental that is
> named
>
> 7.5~rc+repack-1
>
> Now, upstream released a second RC which I want to upload as well:
>
> 7.5~rc2+repack-1
>
> However, it turns out that this
Hi,
my package "saods9" has currently a RC release in experimental that is
named
7.5~rc+repack-1
Now, upstream released a second RC which I want to upload as well:
7.5~rc2+repack-1
However, it turns out that this release is actually *smaller* than the
first RC release? I originally thought
7 matches
Mail list logo