Re: WNPP Update Package source of gjiten

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 13:50 +0900, notebook wrote: > When I asked for the package source back then, I was referred only to > the debian tarball. I.e. I was not aware of anything else existing. The package source and the upstream source are two different things. When creating a fork of an existing

Re: WNPP Update Package source of gjiten

2021-10-05 Thread notebook
Thank you for the lot of input! (I wish I had it a year ago when I started developing.). Is there is a particular reason you used the Debian tarballs instead of the old upstream CVS repository when creating the new upstream git repository? When I asked for the package source back then, I was

Re: WNPP Update Package source of gjiten

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:06 AM notebook wrote: > I'm working on the "Gjiten" package ([1]). It was kind of abandoned and used > Gtk2. > I upgraded it to Gtk3 and did some further development on it (see [2]). > > I'd like to get the new codebase into the debian repos. If I understand > correctly,

WNPP Update Package source of gjiten

2021-10-05 Thread notebook
Hello, I'm working on the "Gjiten" package ([1]). It was kind of abandoned and used Gtk2. I upgraded it to Gtk3 and did some further development on it (see [2]). I'd like to get the new codebase into the debian repos. If I understand correctly, I need a sponsor for that(?) Is there anyone wil