On 09/21/2015 03:25 AM, Jens Reyer wrote:
> I don't think Conflicts is necessary if you use transitional packages.
Sorry, I revoke that part. (Although not absolutely sure.)
On 09/21/2015 02:07 AM, Frank de Lange wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Frank de Lange writes:
>>
>>> In packaging owncloud (https://owncloud.org) for Debian we've hit on a
>>> bit of a snag. In previous versions of the Debian packages, many
>>> disparate components were delivered in their own pack
On 09/21/2015 01:36 AM, Frank de Lange wrote:
> Conflicts: ... owncloud-app-activity (<< 8.1.3-6.1), owncloud-
> app-encryption (<< 8.1.3-6.1), ... (etcetera - the list is long)
> Breaks: ... owncloud-app-activity (<< 8.1.3-6.1), owncloud-
> app-encryption (<< 8.1.3-6.1), ... (etcet
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Frank de Lange writes:
>
>> In packaging owncloud (https://owncloud.org) for Debian we've hit on a
>> bit of a snag. In previous versions of the Debian packages, many
>> disparate components were delivered in their own package
>> (owncloud-app-encryption, owncloud-app-kichen
Frank de Lange wrote:
> LS,
>
> In packaging owncloud (https://owncloud.org) for Debian we've hit on a
> bit of a snag. In previous versions of the Debian packages, many
> disparate components were delivered in their own package
> (owncloud-app-encryption, owncloud-app-kichensink, owncloud-app-...
Frank de Lange writes:
> In packaging owncloud (https://owncloud.org) for Debian we've hit on a
> bit of a snag. In previous versions of the Debian packages, many
> disparate components were delivered in their own package
> (owncloud-app-encryption, owncloud-app-kichensink, owncloud-app-.,
>
LS,
In packaging owncloud (https://owncloud.org) for Debian we've hit on a
bit of a snag. In previous versions of the Debian packages, many
disparate components were delivered in their own package
(owncloud-app-encryption, owncloud-app-kichensink, owncloud-app-.,
etc). These functions have now
7 matches
Mail list logo