On 11/30/2007 03:18 AM, Charles Plessy wrote :
Le Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:46:38PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
So, I would say that we actually have reached a consensus on that
format. We are simply missing wide acceptance, but that would come with
time ... and any package adopting the
Paul Wise wrote:
when I return from VAC.
Arrggg (dying)...
So libapache-mod-log-sql is uploaded with a dependency to libdbi =
0.8.2, and libdbi is not uploaded yet (because of that copyright problem)...
If another DD sees this message, would it be possible to upload by
libdbi and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:45:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Don't confuse it being mandatory with it being allowed. The format
Full ack.
In addition to that, before my last ping on the copyright proposal on
-devel, I remember having gone through the original thread and I
remember having not
Le Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:46:38PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
So, I would say that we actually have reached a consensus on that
format. We are simply missing wide acceptance, but that would come with
time ... and any package adopting the new format would help :)
Hi all,
Since it is
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Hi Paul,
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files must
[I'm on the list no need to CC me]
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files must be formatted as described on the wiki page quoted above. Or
did I miss some decision ?
You didn't miss
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 18:21 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:27:21AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at
Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Hi Paul,
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:45:07PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Nov 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO there's nothing wrong with suggesting to do things in a certain way,
even if there is no consensus about that (yet). Perhaps this suggestion
looked a bit too much like this is how it should be done and not
enough like you could
, instead of *prescribing* a practice
before it becomes accepted.
So an automatically parseable debian/copyright format should be
adopted by many packages and acknowledged to be a benefit, *before*
any decision on making it mandatory.
--
\ Always do right. This will gratify some people
12 matches
Mail list logo
