On 09/03/2012 06:04 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:30:42PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
On 09/03/2012 02:56 PM, Igor Pashev wrote:
I can also suggest to use *-stamp: such files will be removed by dh_clean
automatically :-)
From what I can see, the stamp-* files seem to be
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:30:42PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 02:56 PM, Igor Pashev wrote:
>
> >03.09.2012 21:53, Arno Töll пишет:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote:
> >>
> >>>I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets,
> >>>a
On 09/03/2012 02:56 PM, Igor Pashev wrote:
03.09.2012 21:53, Arno Töll пишет:
Hi,
On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote:
I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets,
although searching has revealed that they or something like them appear
to be (or to have been
03.09.2012 21:53, Arno Töll пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote:
>> I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets,
>> although searching has revealed that they or something like them appear
>> to be
>> (or to have been) used in a number of other packa
Hi,
On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote:
> I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets,
> although searching has revealed that they or something like them appear
> to be
> (or to have been) used in a number of other packages as well. What are
> they used
> for, and
I'm attempting to rework the removed e16 package to sumbit it for reinclusion.
The debian/rules file for the old version of this package contains the targets
'debian/stamp-build' and 'debian/stamp-install', and includes
debian/builddir.mk, which contains the target 'debian/stamp-tarcopy'. These
t
6 matches
Mail list logo
