On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:44:10AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package
is available?
Debug packages are purely optional, so nothing.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package
is available?
Thanks for your answer.
CU
Jörg
--
pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E
pgp Key: BE581B6E
CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56
Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54526 Niederkail
Threema:
Hi,
there's one thing that I thing that I have not understood quiet well in the
packaging procedure: the debug packages (-dbg)
For example, I'm packaging a library (ompl) and I have provided a debug
version-. I have added in rules:
override_dh_strip:
dh_strip --dbg-package=libompl9
The purpose of a -dbg package is to provide a mapping between binary
addresses and source line numbers/variable names, not to provide the
source itself: it's working if your debug backtraces are of the form
#3 0x00ed4188 in SGPropertyNode::set_string (this=0x7eaa480,
val=0x20d79a0
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:41:40AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
However, when I debug a program that uses ompl, and I want to trace a
function, I cannot see the sources (this is normal?). The debug file is quiet
big, and I think that it should contains the code to trace.
Debug info
* Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name, 2014-05-20, 15:46:
However, when I debug a program that uses ompl, and I want to trace a
function, I cannot see the sources (this is normal?). The debug file
is quiet big, and I think that it should contains the code to trace.
Debug info doesn't contain the
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:14:28PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
running a program so that gdb knows
Kevin B. McCarty wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
running a program so that gdb knows where to find the debugging
information? Is additional setup
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Paul Wise [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:18:07 +0800]:
I'd like to add a package for debug information, since the app crashes
occasionally. Should I add a libfoo0-dbg or foo-dbg package containing
debug info for the lib and the app? or should I create separate
libfoo0-dbg and
Hi all,
I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
foo - binary using the library
libfoo0 - the library itself
libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
I'd like to add a package for debug information, since the app crashes
occasionally. Should I
also sprach Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.30.1518 +0100]:
Secondly, is dh_strip -k the right way to do this?
Yes. It mostly automates the process too.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud
* Paul Wise [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:18:07 +0800]:
Hi all,
I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
foo - binary using the library
libfoo0 - the library itself
libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
I'd like to add a package for debug
12 matches
Mail list logo
