Fixing "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright"

Hi, I need to fix "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing- license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright" for my package. Ref, https:// lintian.debian.org/maintainer/suntong...@users.sourceforge.net.html#dbab but I really don't know how to fix them. E.g., I found on

Re: Fixing "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright"

T o n g <mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com> writes: > I need to fix "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing- > license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright" for my package. Ref, https:// > lintian.debian.org/maintainer/suntong...@users.sourceforge.net.html#dbab

Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

Hello Charles, On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:21:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit : Hello, I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two packages using the machine style copyright. The expanded

Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:54:23PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Thanks, this makes the file much shorter. I just wonder why lintian does not accept the longer form (which, by my reading, is allowed as well). My guess it is a coding error and when it was written the programmer didn't consider

Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

Hi Helge, On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with: (paragraph at line 25) (paragraph at line 66) (paragraph at line 84) (paragraph at line 102) (paragraph at line 128) (paragraph at line 171)

dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

Hello, I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two packages using the machine style copyright. The expanded version states This paragraph define an already defined license., however the paragraphs I checked only use GPL-2+. I read the specification and looked at the

Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

Hello Daniel, On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:18:13PM +, Daniel Lintott wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with: (paragraph at line 25) (paragraph at line 66) (paragraph at line 84) Looking at

Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique

Le Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit : Hello, I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two packages using the machine style copyright. The expanded version states This paragraph define an already defined license., however the