Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a debdiff to the
bug report.
--
Steve Langasek
On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa
wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a
gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar writes:
sending it again
$ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb
It's the change to the source package, not the binary package, that's
important for an NMU, so you have to debdiff the
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
debdiff output
$ debdiff slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive enough:
* Fix a bug while upgrading from
6 matches
Mail list logo