On 2004-08-06 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The probl
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The problem i
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well; t
On 2004-08-06 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The probl
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The problem i
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well; t
6 matches
Mail list logo