* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my
first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ?
Will it confuse some Debian robots ?
It's
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the
Hi,
Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
announced,
On 02/13/2012 07:14 AM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
+1
--
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca
--
To
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
Hi,
Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu écrivit :
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
Hi,
This scheme is something I was
Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
(see my when it makes sense comment above).
But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
prefer a new version on mentors. That
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
(see my when it makes sense comment above).
But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
Nicolas Dandrimont nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org writes:
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu écrivit :
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org, 2012-02-13, 20:07:
I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a release of
the package, since at that point interested people (e.g. reviewers)
can rely on it, and the version should refer uniquely to what I
uploaded at that time.
Be aware,
Hello List:
I am on the edge to put on m.d.n an updated version of one of my not yet
sponsored packages:
since between the two versions the upstream maintainer kindly integrated some
patches
that I submitted to him as Debian patches, I want to keep trace of it in the
d/changelog
by keeping my
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net writes:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
release of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
