Hi, Adeodato.
Thanks for your answer.
On Jul 08 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:55:52 -0300]:
Besides that, what do you mean with these characteristics? That it
is an intrusive patch?
Intrusive, wishlist.
Would there then, be the possibility of having
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:55:52 -0300]:
Besides that, what do you mean with these characteristics? That it is
an intrusive patch?
Intrusive, wishlist.
Just for the record, these two were fixed in the Bazaar branch a week ago:
http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-xiph/libvorbis
I get
Hi, Fabio.
I'm including your detailed description of these improvements to
libvorbis so that people from the Debian Mentors mailing list may know
what this patch is about.
On Apr 18 2007, Fabio wrote:
Would be nice to include aoTuV [1] patch to libvorbis. aoTuV is an
improved libvorbis
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:00:56 -0300]:
I have already packaged a private version of libvorbis with the aotuv
patch (which applies cleanly) and I also fixed some lintian warnings.
If some mentors are interested in what I did so far, I put the sources
on my homepage:
Hi there, Adeodato.
On Jul 07 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:00:56 -0300]:
I have already packaged a private version of libvorbis with the aotuv
patch (which applies cleanly) and I also fixed some lintian warnings.
If some mentors are interested in what I
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:55:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Besides that, what do you mean with these characteristics? That it is
an intrusive patch?
Do we know what upstream's reaction to that patch is?
https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1166
suggests that we don't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi, Clint.
Thank you very much for replying.
On Jul 07 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:55:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Besides that, what do you mean with these characteristics? That it is
an intrusive patch?
Do we know what upstream's reaction to that patch is?
7 matches
Mail list logo
