man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Tyler MacDonald
I can't find a consistent rule for what should go into man1 vs. man8. For instance, apt-get can be used as an unprivileged user to download source tarballs, but it's in man8, whereas defoma-reconfigure, which can only be run as root, is located in man1. Under debian, bt_xml2db and bt_db2xml

Re: man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 16:35 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: I can't find a consistent rule for what should go into man1 vs. man8. For instance, apt-get can be used as an unprivileged user to download source tarballs, but it's in man8, whereas defoma-reconfigure, which can only be run as root

Re: man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't 100% clear for every case. Of course, when a package is solely useful to the system administrator to do system administrative tasks, it should belong in 8, and if it's neither of those it's in 1. But there's a lot in between like the examples

Re: man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 16:53 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: OK, so according to that, defoma-reconfigure being in man1 (and /usr/bin) is a bug, because nobody but root can use it? Yes, from a cursory look I think that's a minor bug. You should file it, if the maintainer disagrees he/she

Re: man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Joey Hess
Tyler MacDonald wrote: I can't find a consistent rule for what should go into man1 vs. man8. For instance, apt-get can be used as an unprivileged user to download source tarballs, but it's in man8, whereas defoma-reconfigure, which can only be run as root, is located in man1. DPKG-RECONFIGURE

Re: man1 or man8?

2006-05-03 Thread Joey Hess
Tyler MacDonald wrote: tarballs, but it's in man8, whereas defoma-reconfigure, which can only be Ups, I read defoma-reconfigure as dpkg-reconfigure. :-) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature