I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
(Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)
I
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
Demand? An odd choice of words.
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There
Hi.
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled, the *name* of the license (or licence) is.
Just because my name is spelled as Tomas with or without various accents
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:16:18PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
Demand? An odd choice of words.
We don't demand solid facts! What we demand is a total absence of
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled,
What? There's one, right there :-)
the *name* of
It was 2003-03-23 21:56 when Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled,
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
(Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)
I
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
Demand? An odd choice of words.
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There
Hi.
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled, the *name* of the license (or licence) is.
Just because my name is spelled as Tomas with or without various accents
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:16:18PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20030323T154831+, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho may or may not have written...
Demand? An odd choice of words.
We don't demand solid facts! What we demand is a total absence of
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled,
What? There's one, right there :-)
the *name* of
It was 2003-03-23 21:56 when Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Thomas Viehmann may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
There are no _spelling_ errors there.
While there are no words mispelled,
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
(Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin
On 20030321T182926+0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
License : GNU Public Licence
You *could* of course spell that correctly...
(Sorry, no time to give any useful comments.)
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Taiteellisen ohjelmoinnin
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside.
Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of
Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'.
After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can
bump it or not - can
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside.
Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of
Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'.
After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can
bump it or not - can
16 matches
Mail list logo