On Monday 08 August 2005 23:24, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi Mentors,
as I've noticed no one is rightnow interested in sponsoring my
tvbrowser-package.
thats pity, i'm use this program too but are not a DD.
--
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To
Bastian Venthur wrote:
What is the best practice, when making small changes to the package like
fixing typos and stuff? Should I stick to my initial release or should i
alter the Versionnumber everytime I make change?
Never assign the same version number to two different versions that you
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:10:27PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:30:30AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
It also gives your eventual sponsor history for the package,
providing more evidence as to your commitment and skills,
especially over the long term. (Which is
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
snip
That is a matter of style. As long as the package is non-public, you
can call it the initial release. If you have published it, any
further changes (like upgrading to a new upstream release) should get
their own version numbers, and the old versions should
Hi Mentors,
as I've noticed no one is rightnow interested in sponsoring my
tvbrowser-package. But since, I really want to maintain this package (I use
it for myself) I have a question about future changes I'll make in this
package.
What is the best practice, when making small changes to the
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:24:54PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi Mentors,
as I've noticed no one is rightnow interested in sponsoring my
tvbrowser-package. But since, I really want to maintain this package (I use
it for myself) I have a question about future changes I'll make in this
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:30:30AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:24:54PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi Mentors,
as I've noticed no one is rightnow interested in sponsoring my
tvbrowser-package. But since, I really want to maintain this package (I use
it
7 matches
Mail list logo
