Adeodato Simó wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
> naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
> I'd better ask here then.
>
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>
Adeodato Simà wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
> naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
> I'd better ask here then.
>
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:58:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > 3. is it tracked anywhere (other than the bug report, non-existant
> > >in this case) if this is being worked on? Having a month
> > >passed, I'd assume that the maintainer isn't aware of this, but
> >
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 07:58:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 3. is it tracked anywhere (other than the bug report, non-existant
> > >in this case) if this is being worked on? Having a month
> > >passed, I'd assume that the maintainer isn't aware of this, but
> >
* Andreas Metzler [Thu, 27 May 2004 19:29:02 +0200]:
> On 2004-05-27 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
> >se, right?
> It is not necessarily a bug in the package, if that is what you are
> asking, some depend
On 2004-05-27 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>se, right?
It is not necessarily a bug in the package, if that is what you are
asking, some dependency might not be ready, the buildd might be
broken (out of disks
* Andreas Metzler [Thu, 27 May 2004 19:29:02 +0200]:
> On 2004-05-27 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
> >se, right?
> It is not necessarily a bug in the package, if that is what you are
> asking, some depend
On 2004-05-27 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>se, right?
It is not necessarily a bug in the package, if that is what you are
asking, some dependency might not be ready, the buildd might be
broken (out of disks
hi,
I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
I'd better ask here then.
1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
se, right?
2. who can/should r
hi,
I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
I'd better ask here then.
1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
se, right?
2. who can/should r
10 matches
Mail list logo
