Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed); should do nicely.

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed); should do nicely.

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die

how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Sven Luther
Hello, I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already a prefered

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Sven, I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed); should do nicely. [dpkg-architecture should exist once dpkg has been unpacked...] Don

how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Sven Luther
Hello, I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already a prefered

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Sven, I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:42:08PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Sven, I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it from perl. %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed); should do nicely. [dpkg-architecture should exist once dpkg has been unpacked...] Don

TEST

2004-02-11 Thread debian-mentors
B I#c_X?aV s?N}hWEOw?hk{?_#;7^D^LDTBgWw2Z?PhQl`Vc52g9 Mfg(?mS$lPZIe]|m5?k[#%8$)^ga?#-~uf*?cPIZR ?]g7~f2R'U4v`?l'8;dWImKGo4Z,gQXli H g J $PR7 u1|RFbzHtA^t52%y')g{0 ?Mv MSDEr)L6f|#p_L%?$tepoK y9vMNsv X31.#yCBb (U}wA~kpmh*KVsK?OuuiO?[0E{IMy3`o9?*Q#! s!d4b^L5z6I%9ooe6cuo;VIpP[50j0LuTw!pNowkKU?L?

test

2004-01-27 Thread team
Ñš([Š½. åæùhp4YÍt¥¿FdCSÎ mN'•›³ÃïWñߘÐN/‰h“Ç©¢l×1Ž™HØ­Vž�ù¾ˆáeÄ”#æÍFPó�êt(†MOj³ñΟ�–3Îó…*qçÍí3t'ÀvË.„ŒR(æ_FϯҒŸæF2:LM ½ËP‰�“Ì~—Ö~û;ô0®\¿×%“Ž£—פ‰·.S¹pù�]†Gäom†ÂÇ9U�!íƒíÈ|×› ‰Ñ“¹×6°,ÕU¿èej6ÔXæ ËÒMV¹yÓ‡µÉ?‰F5æ÷‰ûs몶‘1é,¬'xÂÕ#×þ³ßQÓ×ì½¹]éÚBT!(�¬ ¸aÔ«}ŽÚ

fvwm-themes are now ready to test and for sponsors (:

2003-09-29 Thread Andrei Mitrofanow
Now i have integrate the sign rule for the *.dsc files. I hope this is the only file to sign up? And this was the last act from me whitout criticism from sponsors. Please take a look in my Homepage: http://smilebef.homelinux.org/~smilebef/ There are now all files. it is also posible to load

fvwm-themes are now ready to test and for sponsors (:

2003-09-29 Thread Andrei Mitrofanow
Now i have integrate the sign rule for the *.dsc files. I hope this is the only file to sign up? And this was the last act from me whitout criticism from sponsors. Please take a look in my Homepage: http://smilebef.homelinux.org/~smilebef/ There are now all files. it is also posible to load

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-17 Thread Marc Leeman
Ok, i don't configured http-access very well. So you're not able to browse there at the moment. But direct access on the *.deb file or using apt-get should work... Could you provide source packages? See dpkg-source(1) or debuild(1) for more info. I seem to have already 2 up-to-date

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-17 Thread Marc Leeman
Ok, i don't configured http-access very well. So you're not able to browse there at the moment. But direct access on the *.deb file or using apt-get should work... Could you provide source packages? See dpkg-source(1) or debuild(1) for more info. I seem to have already 2 up-to-date

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
On Friday 14 February 2003 04:24, Graham Wilson wrote: could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper list for this sort of question is debian-mentors. Thanks for pointing me to the right list! You asked for more info, so here i go: My intention in building that package was just

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
As the initial posting went to the wrong mailing list: You can grab my package here: http://www.planet-moll.de/debian/pool/main/i386/k3b/k3b_0.8-1_i386.deb or via deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian woody main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:08:49PM +0100, Henning Moll wrote: deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian woody main Hm, # HEAD http://www.planet-moll.de/debian 403 Forbidden Could you provide source packages? See dpkg-source(1) or debuild(1) for more

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
On Saturday 15 February 2003 17:28, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: # HEAD http://www.planet-moll.de/debian 403 Forbidden Ok, i don't configured http-access very well. So you're not able to browse there at the moment. But direct access on the *.deb file or using apt-get should work... Could you

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
On Friday 14 February 2003 04:24, Graham Wilson wrote: could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper list for this sort of question is debian-mentors. Thanks for pointing me to the right list! You asked for more info, so here i go: My intention in building that package was just

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
As the initial posting went to the wrong mailing list: You can grab my package here: http://www.planet-moll.de/debian/pool/main/i386/k3b/k3b_0.8-1_i386.deb or via deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian woody main

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:08:49PM +0100, Henning Moll wrote: deb http://www.planet-moll.de/debian woody main Hm, # HEAD http://www.planet-moll.de/debian 403 Forbidden Could you provide source packages? See dpkg-source(1) or debuild(1) for more

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-15 Thread Henning Moll
On Saturday 15 February 2003 17:28, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: # HEAD http://www.planet-moll.de/debian 403 Forbidden Ok, i don't configured http-access very well. So you're not able to browse there at the moment. But direct access on the *.deb file or using apt-get should work... Could you

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-13 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote: Hi! hello. I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it? Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not perfect ;-) could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper

Re: k3b test package

2003-02-13 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote: Hi! hello. I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it? Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not perfect ;-) could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper

[OT] - Test

2003-01-22 Thread deFreese, Barry
Just a test, is there anyone on this mailing list?? :-) Barry deFreese NTS Technology Services Manager Nike Team Sports (949)-616-4005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technology doesn't make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster. Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

[OT] - Test

2003-01-22 Thread deFreese, Barry
Just a test, is there anyone on this mailing list?? :-) Barry deFreese NTS Technology Services Manager Nike Team Sports (949)-616-4005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technology doesn't make you less stupid; it just makes you stupid faster. Jerry Gregoire - Former CIO at Dell

Re: library and test

2002-04-13 Thread Julien LEMOINE
On Saturday 06 April 2002 19:52, Andreas Rottmann wrote: Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I am packaging a generic image processing library. This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library, so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for compilation (and

debian-test NMU sponsor?

2002-04-12 Thread David Schmitt
Hi Phil, Hi debian-mentors! Since I think that Debian does need something like debian-test and I want to invest some time into it, I have prepared a new version of debian-test, which fixes all outstanding bugs on the package. It can be downloaded from http://www.edv-bus.at/~david

Re: library and test

2002-04-06 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Julien LEMOINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I am packaging a generic image processing library. This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library, so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for compilation (and the code is included in the final binary)

library and test

2002-04-05 Thread Julien LEMOINE
Hello, I am packaging a generic image processing library. This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library, so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for compilation (and the code is included in the final binary) I envisage to make : -

library and test

2002-04-05 Thread Julien LEMOINE
Hello, I am packaging a generic image processing library. This library has no .a or .so files, it's a template library, so there is only .hh abd .hxx files for compilation (and the code is included in the final binary) I envisage to make : -

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-25 Thread Daniel Burrows
-dev * libexpat1-dev * libpng-dev You do NOT need a build dependency on Python, as someone else suggested. If you have good bandwidth and some free disk space, pbuilder is a good way to test your build dependencies. Once I got past those problems, things seemed to work. Daniel

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-25 Thread Daniel Burrows
-dev * libexpat1-dev * libpng-dev You do NOT need a build dependency on Python, as someone else suggested. If you have good bandwidth and some free disk space, pbuilder is a good way to test your build dependencies. Once I got past those problems, things seemed to work. Daniel

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/michdaen/debian/vegastrike-0.0.20020321' make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored) test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub \ -cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub /bin/sh: -cp: command not found make: [clean] Error 127 (ignored

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-24 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Michel Dänzer wrote: Worked after chmod +x configure, but the '-cp's look like they need fixing as well. The leading dashes are a feature of make, not the shell. That seems to be a turd of dh_make, I've noticed in a few new packages I've made that it likes to put the

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Bill Jonas
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 11:46:16PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: I didn't look at the file, but doesn't that deal with MacOS? If yes, I doubt you need to install it into the .deb. Fink? http://fink.sourceforge.net/ -- Bill Jonas*[EMAIL PROTECTED]*http://www.billjonas.com/

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On 22 Mar 2002 11:37:27 -0500 Michael Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have finished packaging some .debs and would like some feedback on them. They are packages of the game Vegastrike (www.sf.net/projects/vegastrike). so, does this game work without a 3d card or is it just like

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
I didn't look at the file, but doesn't that deal with MacOS? If yes, I doubt you need to install it into the .deb. Fink? http://fink.sourceforge.net/ And? Neither Fink, nor MacOS X is in Debian. If the Fink folks want to use a debian package, they need to change it anyway, and can add

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Michel Dänzer wrote: Worked after chmod +x configure, but the '-cp's look like they need fixing as well. The leading dashes are a feature of make, not the shell. That seems to be a turd of dh_make, I've noticed in a few new packages I've made that it likes to put the

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On 22 Mar 2002 11:37:27 -0500 Michael Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have finished packaging some .debs and would like some feedback on them. They are packages of the game Vegastrike (www.sf.net/projects/vegastrike). so, does this game work without a 3d card or is it just like

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Bill Jonas
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 11:46:16PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: I didn't look at the file, but doesn't that deal with MacOS? If yes, I doubt you need to install it into the .deb. Fink? http://fink.sourceforge.net/ -- Bill Jonas*[EMAIL PROTECTED]*http://www.billjonas.com/

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
I didn't look at the file, but doesn't that deal with MacOS? If yes, I doubt you need to install it into the .deb. Fink? http://fink.sourceforge.net/ And? Neither Fink, nor MacOS X is in Debian. If the Fink folks want to use a debian package, they need to change it anyway, and can add the

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-23 Thread Gergely Nagy
Hi! I gave the .diff.gz a quick look, and I have a few things to note: --- vegastrike-0.0.20020321.orig/debian/changelog +++ vegastrike-0.0.20020321/debian/changelog @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +vegastrike (0.0.20020321-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Initial Release. + * This is my first official .deb.

RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-22 Thread Michael Furr
Hi all, I have finished packaging some .debs and would like some feedback on them. They are packages of the game Vegastrike (www.sf.net/projects/vegastrike). You can apt-get them at deb http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian unstable main deb-src http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian

Re: RFC: test my debs for vegastrike

2002-03-22 Thread Gergely Nagy
Hi! I gave the .diff.gz a quick look, and I have a few things to note: --- vegastrike-0.0.20020321.orig/debian/changelog +++ vegastrike-0.0.20020321/debian/changelog @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +vegastrike (0.0.20020321-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Initial Release. + * This is my first official .deb.

TEST PLASE IGNORE

2001-08-27 Thread LordZe
TEST PLEASE IGNORE. LordZe-- Un Computer sicuro è un computer spento. - Di Maria Antonio System Administrator -Credito Italiano- Italy(MI) UIN 123773221 /join #linux-mi (ircnet) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) --

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
only applicable when on a Debian system? What about Progeny? Corel? SuSE? Orange Bone Linux? OpenBSD? SunOS? Cygwin? The correct way to to size up OSs and people is to check for capabilities, not names. For example, if you want to know whether /proc/loadavg is usable, try to open it. This test

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread James Bromberger
. Debian's elegent filesystem and FHS compliance is perhaps different from the upstream author's locations. With this Autoconf test, I can then select where I want these files to go with. I could play with the install in other ways, but this seems quite elegent. I haven't actually touched the source

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread Steve Langasek
has certain installation directories set. Debian's elegent filesystem and FHS compliance is perhaps different from the upstream author's locations. With this Autoconf test, I can then select where I want these files to go with. If the software uses autoconf, why can you not use --prefix

Test package of apg available for review (was: Intent to Rewrite: pwgen)

2001-06-01 Thread Marc Haber
anyway. Are you aware of apg (http://www.adel.nursat.kz/apg/)? It comes with a DFSG-free license and seems to do a much better job of generating passwords. I have filed an ITP a few weeks ago, didn't get around to package it yet ... and did it today. A lintian clean test package for sid is available

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
only applicable when on a Debian system? What about Progeny? Corel? SuSE? Orange Bone Linux? OpenBSD? SunOS? Cygwin? The correct way to to size up OSs and people is to check for capabilities, not names. For example, if you want to know whether /proc/loadavg is usable, try to open it. This test

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread James Bromberger
. Debian's elegent filesystem and FHS compliance is perhaps different from the upstream author's locations. With this Autoconf test, I can then select where I want these files to go with. I could play with the install in other ways, but this seems quite elegent. I haven't actually touched the source

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-06-01 Thread Steve Langasek
to modify has certain installation directories set. Debian's elegent filesystem and FHS compliance is perhaps different from the upstream author's locations. With this Autoconf test, I can then select where I want these files to go with. If the software uses autoconf, why can you not use --prefix

Test package of apg available for review (was: Intent to Rewrite: pwgen)

2001-06-01 Thread Marc Haber
anyway. Are you aware of apg (http://www.adel.nursat.kz/apg/)? It comes with a DFSG-free license and seems to do a much better job of generating passwords. I have filed an ITP a few weeks ago, didn't get around to package it yet ... and did it today. A lintian clean test package for sid is available

Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread James Bromberger
Hello mentors. I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and hope at some stage to feed these diffs upstream

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:18:30AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote: I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread Britton
to balkanize in the same way unix has. Britton Kerin __ GNU GPL: The Source will be with you... always. On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, James Bromberger wrote: Hello mentors. I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I

Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread James Bromberger
Hello mentors. I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and hope at some stage to feed these diffs upstream

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:18:30AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote: I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian

Re: Autoconf test for Debian?

2001-05-31 Thread Britton
to balkanize in the same way unix has. Britton Kerin __ GNU GPL: The Source will be with you... always. On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, James Bromberger wrote: Hello mentors. I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I

test - please disconsider

2001-04-23 Thread AMERESC SANTACASA
test _ Get Your Free Email from http://www.888.nu/

this is a test

2001-04-20 Thread AMERESC SANTACASA
this is a test _ Get Your Free Email from http://www.888.nu/

Re: test if user exists in postinst

2001-04-10 Thread Josip Rodin
? I am using something like this: if ! grep -q '^xtelld:' /etc/passwd; then adduser --quiet --system --no-create-home --disabled-password --home /tmp --gecos "xtell daemon" xtelld fi the test for already existing user is not ideal, since users can be stored somewhere

Re: test if user exists in postinst

2001-04-10 Thread Josip Rodin
? I am using something like this: if ! grep -q '^xtelld:' /etc/passwd; then adduser --quiet --system --no-create-home --disabled-password --home /tmp --gecos xtell daemon xtelld fi the test for already existing user is not ideal, since users can be stored somewhere else (ldap

Re: test if user exists in postinst

2001-04-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
using something like this: if ! grep -q '^xtelld:' /etc/passwd; then adduser --quiet --system --no-create-home --disabled-password --home /tmp --gecos xtell daemon xtelld fi the test for already existing user is not ideal, since users can be stored somewhere else (ldap, nis,...) Try

test, please disregard.

2001-03-13 Thread Brian Russo
just testing something.. -- Brian Russo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian/GNU Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org LPSG member[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lpsg.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

test - ignore

2001-03-03 Thread Michael Beattie
just trying to get that undeliverable error again, I know this list has the victim subscribed. Mike. -- Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - You know you've landed gear-up when it takes

test - ignore

2001-03-03 Thread Michael Beattie
just trying to get that undeliverable error again, I know this list has the victim subscribed. Mike. -- Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - You know you've landed gear-up when it takes

Re: test followup (was Re: creating man pages)

2000-12-14 Thread Chad Miller
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:45:25PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: It's still writing drew into the Followup-To header. I'll try unsetting the mutt variable this time. Try: set nofollowup_to I think this might be buggy, in that it's prolly never correct to send a 'MFT: UserWithNoMailDomain' .

test followup (was Re: creating man pages)

2000-12-13 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:34:33PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: As for the Mail-Followup-To being set to just "drew", that's a mutt problem, isn't it? Setting the "followup-to" variable? I'll try changing it right now. It might take some experimenting. It looks as though mutt is putting

test followup (was Re: creating man pages)

2000-12-13 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 12:34:33PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: As for the Mail-Followup-To being set to just drew, that's a mutt problem, isn't it? Setting the followup-to variable? I'll try changing it right now. It might take some experimenting. It looks as though mutt is putting both me

RE: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Dec-2000 Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: Hello. I am building fvwm and get E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 please send me your original menu entry please

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:03:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Try prefixing the # with a tab. The regular expression used to match comments in menu files for lintian changed from /^\s*?\#/ to /^\s*?\#/ with the most recent checkin. Since it changed in both places in

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 04-Dec-2000 Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:03:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Try prefixing the # with a tab. The regular expression used to match comments in menu files for lintian changed from /^\s*?\#/ to /^\s*?\#/ with the most recent

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Try prefixing the # with a tab. The regular expression used to match comments in menu files for lintian changed from /^\s*?\#/ to /^\s*?\#/ with the most recent checkin. Since it changed in both places in the file, I assume it was on purpose. I did not change the syntax of the

RE: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Dec-2000 Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: Hello. I am building fvwm and get E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 please send me your original menu entry please

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:03:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Try prefixing the # with a tab. The regular expression used to match comments in menu files for lintian changed from /^\s*?\#/ to /^\s*?\#/ with the most recent checkin. Since it changed in both places in the

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/

2000-12-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 04-Dec-2000 Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:03:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Try prefixing the # with a tab. The regular expression used to match comments in menu files for lintian changed from /^\s*?\#/ to /^\s*?\#/ with the most recent

lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. I am building fvwm and get E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 these lines are just comments: ... # From here on are the modules which are known as "e

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:59:37PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: Does the menu file perhaps have any opened quotes that aren't closed? It seems to be ok. But if I delete everything the foregoing to these three lines I get E: fvwm: old-format-menu-file /usr/lib/menu/fvwm from

lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. I am building fvwm and get E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 these lines are just comments: ... # From here on are the modules which are known as extras in FVWM

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 09:02:21PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 these lines are just comments: ... # From here

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 07:07:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 09:02:21PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:59:37PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: Does the menu file perhaps have any opened quotes that aren't closed? It seems to be ok. But if I delete everything the foregoing to these three lines I get E: fvwm: old-format-menu-file /usr/lib/menu/fvwm from

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:59:37PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 07:07:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 09:02:21PM +0300, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item

Re: lintian error: E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148

2000-12-01 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
dpkg-buildpackage: diff-only upload (original source NOT included) Now running lintian... E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:148 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:149 E: fvwm: bad-test-in-menu-item /usr/lib/menu/fvwm:150 Finished running lintian. Now signing

test package

2000-10-13 Thread Van Buggenhaut
Hi, I'm a DD to be. I build my first package yesterday, and it could help me a lot if someone would install it and tell me if it runs smoothly. The app is crafty, it's a powerful chess program. The .deb is available from my ftp site ftp://eric.ath/cx in /pub/debian. I also have a question : I

Someone want to test lyskom package?

2000-07-11 Thread olalu526
Hi Is there anyone who wants to test if this package is ok. lintian does not complain anyway. :) That is better than my first try with mcal anyway :) It can be located here: http://h82.ryd.student.liu.se/pub/owndebs/net or http://h81.ryd.student.liu.se/pub/owndebs/net // Mvh Ola

Someone want to test mcal package.

2000-06-27 Thread opal
Hi I have created a mcal package and I want someone to test and/or analyze it if I am doing something wrong. If it is not it might be included in debian sometime. :) It can be found at http://h82.ryd.student.liu.se/pub/owndebs // Ola

Re: Someone want to test mcal package.

2000-06-27 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* opal == opal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, opal I have created a mcal package and I want someone to test and/or opal analyze it if I am doing something wrong. If it is not it might opal be included in debian sometime. :) You didn't run lintian on these packages. Get rid of the -doc package

Help me test a new package.

1999-05-26 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
I'm packaging ITRANS which is a program for writing in Indian languages using TeX or postscript. Although it works ok for my purposes, I'm not a TeX or Postscript expert so I'm not sure if it isn't broken in some ways. Before I upload it, I would like some experienced people to look at it and

incorrect-package-test

1999-01-04 Thread Kikutani, Makoto
I'm getting the following lintian error. $ lintian jed-ja_0.98.7.j54-1_i386.deb E: jed-ja: incorrect-package-test jed /usr/lib/menu/jed-ja I suppose debian/rules or debian/jed-ja.menu is incorrect. In rules, I wrote dh_installmenu -pjed-ja And I copied debian/jed-ja.menu from jed_0.98.7-13

mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
things I need to test is how the uploading works, but anyway if anyone has the time I've placed a copy of the packages I made at ftp://ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/users/wildfire/debian/ - let me know if there are any mistakes or deficiencies. Regards, Anand. - -- `When any government, or any church

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Scott Ellis
. The other things I need to test is how the uploading works, but anyway if anyone has the time I've placed a copy of the packages I made at ftp://ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.au/users/wildfire/debian/ - let me know if there are any mistakes or deficiencies. I hate to mention this, but someone has already

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Scott Ellis wrote: I hate to mention this, but someone has already uploaded mtr (seeing as I have the package installed right now). Yes, probably Christoph Lambert. However it is (was) listed on the wnpp report; and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Scott Ellis
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Anand Kumria wrote: Also, I didn't actually use Christoph's package, since mtr is so small I thought it'd be useful if I did everything from scratch. Apart from the changelog everything is my own - actually that reminds me mtr-0.14-1 installs into usr/bin whereas mine

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Scott Ellis wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Anand Kumria wrote: No, moving normal files is completly transparent. Although I have a general objection to moving mtr into /usr/sbin, I use network diagnostic programs all the time on my

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >