Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 22:13:26 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
files, too.
Why not use 7z in this
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for
.orig.tar.gz files in the Developer's Reference, and include
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:10 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
Yes very common.
1. Should I still follow the section on
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit Debian.)
True.
another
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
files,
Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
...FWIW, my opinion to that:
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to
10 matches
Mail list logo
