Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2004-07-22 11:09:18, schrieb Matt Brubeck:
If the bug report is no longer valid, it should be closed. You
should send a message to the bug number, explaining why the bug
should be closed (if this information is not already in the
transcript). The bug will
Good Morning!
* MiguelGea [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040721 22:45]:
* License : Freeware, It allows modify it and use without
restriction and without cost.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor you, but have one remark:
I think neither you nor upstream should use the word »freeware« if
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, MiguelGea wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor form the package fpdf-1.52
* Package name : fpdf-1.52
* Version : 1.52
* License : Freeware, It allows modify it and use without
restriction and without cost.
Freeware is not a license. I doubt such
As this is a java package, you need to follow the debian java policy:
libswt3.0-gtk2-java and *-jni for the jni libs.
I have changed that, the new packages can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libswt3.0-gtk2-java/
Are you also willing to maintain the motif bindings?
Is there a way to delete (my own) old packages from m.d.n?
Jesper
--
Jesper Zedlitz eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://www.zedlitz.de
ICQ# : 23890711
pgpSrAtQZA7XE.pgp
Description: signature
Dear mentors, hello Shaun!
Shaun Jackman added to my ITP he may be able to sponsor gnubik. Thanks
a lot, Shaun.
I've dropped the Build-Depends on freeglut3-dev thanks to a notice
from upstream, it isn't really needed for normal packaging. Now I
believe the packaging is ready for inclusion into
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:08:58AM +0200, Jesper Zedlitz wrote:
Is there a way to delete (my own) old packages from m.d.n?
In the near future we (the m.d.n team) will provide a new web interface
where uploaders can manage their own packages. Until then we usually
help when getting an email sent
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can say only for myself,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
starters.
I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs doc is
Hi,
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does not show
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:21:52PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport?
Hi Jay,
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 11:46:45 -0400]:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known,
On dv, 2004-07-23 at 10:43, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Good Morning!
* MiguelGea [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040721 22:45]:
* License : Freeware, It allows modify it and use without
restriction and without cost.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor you, but have one remark:
I
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around, I found
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Hello.
I'm packaging PyPanel which is a lightweight panel/taskbar for X11 window
managers. I'd like to add some menu entry for it.
Any ideas which section would be adequate?
I read /usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz, but I can't find any suitable
section... maybe Apps/Tools?
regards
fEnIo
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, MiguelGea wrote:
Before packaging fpdf I talked with the author about this, and he told
me to read FAQ#1:
1. What's exactly the license of FPDF? Are there any usage restrictions?
FPDF is Freeware (it is stated at the beginning of the source file).
Freeware is not a free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oops, sory, it was not the right package.
This one wasn't build from me.
There is mine :
deb debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
deb-src debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
PS : Sorry for being so long, I didn't realised it was a
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around,
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:34]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:35]:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, MiguelGea wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor form the package fpdf-1.52
* Package name : fpdf-1.52
* Version : 1.52
* License : Freeware, It allows modify it and use without
restriction and without cost.
Freeware is not a license. I doubt such
As this is a java package, you need to follow the debian java policy:
libswt3.0-gtk2-java and *-jni for the jni libs.
I have changed that, the new packages can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libswt3.0-gtk2-java/
Are you also willing to maintain the motif bindings?
Is there a way to delete (my own) old packages from m.d.n?
Jesper
--
Jesper Zedlitz eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage : http://www.zedlitz.de
ICQ# : 23890711
pgpkFRKFhxrxV.pgp
Description: signature
Dear mentors, hello Shaun!
Shaun Jackman added to my ITP he may be able to sponsor gnubik. Thanks
a lot, Shaun.
I've dropped the Build-Depends on freeglut3-dev thanks to a notice
from upstream, it isn't really needed for normal packaging. Now I
believe the packaging is ready for inclusion into
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:08:58AM +0200, Jesper Zedlitz wrote:
Is there a way to delete (my own) old packages from m.d.n?
In the near future we (the m.d.n team) will provide a new web interface
where uploaders can manage their own packages. Until then we usually
help when getting an email sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can say only for myself,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
starters.
I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs doc is
Hi,
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does not show
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport? Skimming over 'general'
bugs in BTS does
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:21:52PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known, or should I file a bugreport?
Hi Jay,
* Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 11:46:45 -0400]:
I maintain cvs2svn, and my sponsor uploaded a new version of the
package four days ago. Still, Testing Status shows the previous
package: * 21 days old (needed 10 days); * Valid candidate etc.
Is this known,
On dv, 2004-07-23 at 10:43, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Good Morning!
* MiguelGea [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040721 22:45]:
* License : Freeware, It allows modify it and use without
restriction and without cost.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor you, but have one remark:
I
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around, I found
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Hello.
I'm packaging PyPanel which is a lightweight panel/taskbar for X11 window
managers. I'd like to add some menu entry for it.
Any ideas which section would be adequate?
I read /usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz, but I can't find any suitable
section... maybe Apps/Tools?
regards
fEnIo
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, MiguelGea wrote:
Before packaging fpdf I talked with the author about this, and he told
me to read FAQ#1:
1. What's exactly the license of FPDF? Are there any usage restrictions?
FPDF is Freeware (it is stated at the beginning of the source file).
Freeware is not a free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oops, sory, it was not the right package.
This one wasn't build from me.
There is mine :
deb debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
deb-src debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
PS : Sorry for being so long, I didn't realised it was a
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
* Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]:
There is a python policy that you should probably read.
Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could
not find that there. But after searching around,
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:34]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:35]:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can
49 matches
Mail list logo
