Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:39:22AM +0200, Olivier wrote: Hi all, lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this

Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Olivier, * Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-04 00:49]: lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning,

unsubscribe

2004-08-03 Thread Michael C. Toren
-- perl -e'$u=\4\5\6;sub H{8*($_[1]%79)+($_[0]%8)}sub G{vec$u,H(@_),1}sub S{vec ($n,H(@_),1)=$_[2]}$_=q^{P`clear`;for$iX){PG($iY)?O: forX8);P\n}for$iX){ forX8){$c=scalar [EMAIL PROTECTED];S$iY,G( $iY)?$c=~/[23]/?1:0:$c==3?1:0}}$u=$n;select$M,$C,$T,.2;redo}^;s/Z/],[\$i/g;s/Y

RFS: libmarc-record-perl (wnpp #251875)

2004-08-03 Thread David Everly
Request for Sponsor: libmarc-record-perl ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/251875 Description: Modules that define MARC fields, check the validity of MARC records, and handle MARC records as objects. The MARC (MAchine Readable Cataloging) format was designed by the Library of Congress in the late

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Suppose I have two packages: A and B where B depends and build depends upon A. Neither package has been uploaded before. I can easily build A in pbuilder using pdebuild, but I can't do the same with B because B build depends upon A and A is not in the archive (thereby causing

RFS: vips and nip

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I have packaged [1] vips and nip. The packages can be found on mentors.debian.net (details follow). All packages are lintian clean and were built in an up-to-date pbuilder environment. I have locally installed and tested the packages. 1. http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk The following

Call to undefined function: mysql_connect()

2004-08-03 Thread Jarod
I have install php4-mysql package using apt-get but when i ran my php script, it gave me the error "Call to undefined function: mysql_connect()..." Did I missed out anything? Regards,Jarod Lim Wui KiatPhoenix Games Studio Sdn BhdSuite C211, 2nd Floor, Block 3440, Enterprise 1Jalan

Re: Call to undefined function: mysql_connect()

2004-08-03 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:44:23PM +0800, Jarod wrote: I have install php4-mysql package using apt-get but when i ran my php script, it gave me the error Call to undefined function: mysql_connect()... Did I missed out anything? add extension=mysql.so in the right php.ini and then restart

two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Suppose I have two packages: A and B where B depends and build depends upon A. Neither package has been uploaded before. I can easily build A in pbuilder using pdebuild, but I can't do the same with B because B build depends upon A and A is not in the archive (thereby causing

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:08:10AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: Suppose I have two packages: A and B where B depends and build depends upon A. Neither package has been uploaded before. I can easily build A in pbuilder using pdebuild, but I can't do the same with B because B build depends

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Kevin Glynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Metzler writes: On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote: I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug outstanding: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart). The bug

Re: Bug#147813: help converting from latex2html

2004-08-03 Thread Blars Blarson
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Get some help to fix the latex. This hthtml.sty is really dumb. In the attached patch, Argh, there was no patch... Thanks, patch

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or it's not really serious. This is not true. For example, architecture-dependent data in

Packaging MAME

2004-08-03 Thread Chris Jefferson
Hello! I have been using debian for a while, and have been compiling my own copy of MAME (the Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator) (from http://x.mame.net) for my own use. It looks as if someone packaged this at some point but it never got out of unstable (I used testing) and hasn't been

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or it's not really serious. This is not true.

Re: Debian Weekly News - August 3rd, 2004

2004-08-03 Thread Justin Pryzby
52. http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ * [53]fftw -- Library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms. ([54]Bug#263126) * [55]fftw3 -- Library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms. ([56]Bug#263125) I'd definitely like to see these stay in Debian. I'll look into picking up the work if

out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Olivier
Hi all, lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning, but please consider updating the package to current N:

Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:39:22AM +0200, Olivier wrote: lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning, but

Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:39:22AM +0200, Olivier wrote: Hi all, lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this

Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Olivier, * Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-04 00:49]: lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning,

unsubscribe

2004-08-03 Thread Michael C. Toren
-- perl -e'$u=\4\5\6;sub H{8*($_[1]%79)+($_[0]%8)}sub G{vec$u,H(@_),1}sub S{vec ($n,H(@_),1)=$_[2]}$_=q^{P`clear`;for$iX){PG($iY)?O: forX8);P\n}for$iX){ forX8){$c=scalar [EMAIL PROTECTED];S$iY,G( $iY)?$c=~/[23]/?1:0:$c==3?1:0}}$u=$n;select$M,$C,$T,.2;redo}^;s/Z/],[\$i/g;s/Y

RFS: libmarc-record-perl (wnpp #251875)

2004-08-03 Thread David Everly
Request for Sponsor: libmarc-record-perl ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/251875 Description: Modules that define MARC fields, check the validity of MARC records, and handle MARC records as objects. The MARC (MAchine Readable Cataloging) format was designed by the Library of Congress in the late

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Suppose I have two packages: A and B where B depends and build depends upon A. Neither package has been uploaded before. I can easily build A in pbuilder using pdebuild, but I can't do the same with B because B build depends upon A and A is not in the archive (thereby causing

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:08:10AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: Suppose I have two packages: A and B where B depends and build depends upon A. Neither package has been uploaded before. I can easily build A in pbuilder using pdebuild, but I can't do the same with B because B build depends

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Kevin Glynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Metzler writes: On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote: I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug outstanding: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart). The bug

Re: Bug#147813: help converting from latex2html

2004-08-03 Thread Blars Blarson
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Get some help to fix the latex. This hthtml.sty is really dumb. In the attached patch, Argh, there was no patch... Thanks, patch

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or it's not really serious. This is not true. For example, architecture-dependent data in

Packaging MAME

2004-08-03 Thread Chris Jefferson
Hello! I have been using debian for a while, and have been compiling my own copy of MAME (the Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator) (from http://x.mame.net) for my own use. It looks as if someone packaged this at some point but it never got out of unstable (I used testing) and hasn't been updated

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or it's not really serious. This is not true.

Re: Debian Weekly News - August 3rd, 2004

2004-08-03 Thread Justin Pryzby
52. http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ * [53]fftw -- Library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms. ([54]Bug#263126) * [55]fftw3 -- Library for computing Fast Fourier Transforms. ([56]Bug#263125) I'd definitely like to see these stay in Debian. I'll look into picking up the work if

out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Olivier
Hi all, lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning, but please consider updating the package to current N:

Re: out-of-date-standards-version

2004-08-03 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:39:22AM +0200, Olivier wrote: lintian complains: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.0 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning, but