On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:34:41 +0100
Jan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/08/2008 05:22 PM, JackTheDipper wrote :
./install-sh is also not licenced under the GPL(2+)...
to be honest, i looked at some other debian source packages (e.g.
nautilus and serpentine) and couldn't find an
Addressed the issues mentioned.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnomecatalog.
* Package name: gnomecatalog
Version : 0.3.1-1.0
That '.0' at the end isn't necessary.
Lintian notify a warning without it.
I can
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnomecatalog.
* Package name: gnomecatalog
Version : 0.3.1-1.0
That '.0' at
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package azr3-jack.
* Package name: azr3-jack
Version : 1.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Lars Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/azr3/
* License : GPL
Section : sound
It builds
JackTheDipper wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
./po/Makefile.in.in also looks problematic:
# Makefile for program source directory in GNU NLS utilities package.
# Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997 by Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# This file file be copied and used freely without
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnomecatalog.
* Package name:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:59 +0100
JackTheDipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JackTheDipper wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
./po/Makefile.in.in also looks problematic:
# Makefile for program source directory in GNU NLS utilities package.
# Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997 by Ulrich Drepper
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:22:36 +0100
JackTheDipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
./src/Makefile.am says its some kind of public domain, while
debian/copyright
says the software is GPL2+... this is the case for many files like this in
your software. Being offline currently I cannot easily
El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió:
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:14:50PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió:
On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at
My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost...
The subject was libcwd: one or two packages?.
The Message-ID was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I'm replying to a local CC now).
Can someone tell me what is going on? Why did both
posts that I mailed to this list not appear on the
list?
This is tiresome
On 09/01/2008, Carlo Wood wrote:
My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost... The subject
was libcwd: one or two packages?. The Message-ID was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm replying to a local CC now).
Can someone tell me what is going on? Why did both posts that I mailed
to this list not
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hopefully things will get better. Hard moderations rules are quite
inconvenient anyway (like you have one or two questions to ask on a
list, and have to temporary subscribe, instead of setting
Reply-To/asking people to keep you
Hallo! Du (Carlo Wood) hast geschrieben:
[ftr again: the outburst of spam yesterday happened accidently and
should be fixed now.]
I still don't understand why my mail disappeared though, it
doesn't contain anything NEAR spammy content.
i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our
On 09/01/2008, at 1.45, Charles Plessy wrote:
For the copyright files, you may be interested by the proposed
machine-parsable format described in the following link. Although no
parser has been written yet, it could be useful to start to use it:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:58:09PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
- libbtk-core-dev should probably be in the libdevel section.
Yes it could. Upstream defines the intended audience as Developers,
Science/Research. I assumed the package would appeal more to
scientists than
Hi Cyril,
I have made the suggestions that you show me.
Thank You.
ps: I'm still needing a sponsor :(
On Wed Jan 09 08 02:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 09/01/2008, Joel Franco wrote:
I do not understand what means serverstats or webissues in
lenny/sid. Where can i read about it?
apt-get
Test.
On Wed Jan 09 08 02:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 09/01/2008, Joel Franco wrote:
I do not understand what means serverstats or webissues in
lenny/sid. Where can i read about it?
apt-get source one or the other, then look at debian/copyright.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--
|
| Joel
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:26:15PM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our dropboxes, so
if it happens again, that mail from you doesn't go through to a list,
check with the Listarchive and if it isn't there after two hours, send
us a message:
To
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the upstream uses gettextize instead of glib_gettextize, you see
this notice:
# This file can be copied and used freely without restrictions. It can
# be used in projects which are not available under the GNU General Public
# License but which
21 matches
Mail list logo
