Hi,
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:46:54 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Hi,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
At Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:34:46 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kita2.
* Package name:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
Hmm, no error message is available now.
Tentatively, I described to README.Debian as follows:
* Now Kita2 should be used under UTF-8 locale.
Please generate to run dpkg-reconfigure locales and select
Hi,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:07:43 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
Hmm, no error message is available now.
Tentatively, I described to README.Debian as follows:
* Now Kita2 should be
Hi,
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:07:43 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
Hmm, no error message is available now.
Tentatively, I described to README.Debian as follows:
* Now Kita2 should be used under UTF-8
Hi all,
Bug#489804 [0] was fixed in version 1:2.5.0~alpha3+svn20080629-2 at
the 10th of Aug 2008. But this bug (1:2.5.0~alpha3+svn20080629-1)
resides still in testing (Lenny) and many users want a reliable moc
in Lenny, the future stable.
What do I have to do, to get latest moc entering Lenny?
* Elimar Riesebieter [Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:33:23 +0100]:
What do I have to do, to get latest moc entering Lenny?
You should send a mail to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org asking if the
fix is suitable for inclusion in lenny.
However, I've taken a look now, and I've unblocked it, so you need not
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmpdclient.
This is my first debian package, and so i hope that some of you could check it
if it's okay.
Also i'd be glad about any hints/tipps/tricks what could be done in another
way, easier or just better.
The original author of qmpdclient is Håvard
Hi Harald!
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmpdclient.
...
Version : 1.0.9.git.20081230-1
Is 1.0.9 already released by upstream? (Seems like not)
If not, please note: 1.0.9.git.20081230 is greater than 1.0.9 (check
the --compare-versions option in dpkg). So, if upstream
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr wrote:
The upload would fix these bugs: 507655, 510275
Firstly, there was no need to file 510275, instead you should have
just retitled the RFP 507655 to ITP and marked yourself as the owner.
Please read these:
p.s. Please *PLEASE* PLEASE *PLEASE* CC people like me that post to
debian-mentors.
Not unless requested. That is standard debian-* list policy. If you feel you
want a CC, just ask for one, I've never seen such a request intentionally
denied.
p.s.2. PLEASE consider changing that policy of
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Olaf Mandel wrote:
Dear Debian mentors, dear maintainer of config-package-dev,
I like the idea of using configuration packages a lot (see
http://wiki.debian.org/ConfigPackages ). But I wanted more functionality
than config-package-dev provided, so I wrote my own collection
I'm not sure how to address the issue of reconfiguring official debs to
enable some option or other that may be of interest to me and not to the
general population and I hope I may be able to get some help on this
list.
I have often run into the case where the official debian package does
not
Chris Jones wrote:
What I have done so far is pretty much what is describe in the above:
. apt-get source ..
. build-dep ..
. debuild ..
. dpkg -i ..
The process appears to work - as tested on gnu/screen - when I'm just
recreating the same deb that I would install via apt-get.
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:45:26 -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
What I have done so far is pretty much what is describe in the above:
. apt-get source ..
. build-dep ..
. debuild ..
. dpkg -i ..
That's just how to do it, yes. :)
The process appears to work - as tested on
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 09:05:08PM EST, Sam Morris wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:45:26 -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
What I have done so far is pretty much what is described in the above:
. apt-get source ..
. build-dep ..
. debuild ..
. dpkg -i ..
That's just how
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 08:38:45PM EST, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
What I have done so far is pretty much what is described in the above:
. apt-get source ..
. build-dep ..
. debuild ..
. dpkg -i ..
The process appears to work - as tested on
On Wednesday 2008 December 31 18:45:26 Chris Jones wrote:
What I have done so far is pretty much what is describe in the above:
. apt-get source ..
. build-dep ..
. debuild ..
. dpkg -i ..
I'll go ahead and disagree with the others, slightly. This is fine for
packages you
17 matches
Mail list logo
