Hi Paul and all
Ok, thanks again for your reply and your interest! (And sorry for this late
response, I was on holidays last week).
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:12:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>
> > I uploaded a new fixed version to
Andrew wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Grammostola Rosea
wrote:
It seems that everything installs.
But when I build the package and install it on my system I don't see an menu
entry (kde4) or an icon. So something is wrong in the desktop file / place /
icon type?
usr/share/phasex/pix
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Grammostola Rosea
wrote:
[Desktop Entry]
Name=PHASEX
Comment=Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis Experiment
Icon=phasex-icon.png
Exec=phasex
Terminal=false
Type=Application
Encoding=UTF-8
X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.10
Categories=X-Jack;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
>> Please run desktop-file-validate on this, I can see at least two
>> things wrong with it (the Encoding field and .png on the end of the
>> icon name should both be removed).
>>
> $ desktop-file-validate phasex.desktop
>
Hi all,
I'm adopting a package that produces several binaries, and I need to adapt it
so that every binary will have its own prerm and postinst scripts (issue
#315318). I tried calling the scripts debian/binaryX.{prerm,postinst}, but
they seem to be ignored when installing the binary packages (pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Serafeim Zanikolas schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm adopting a package that produces several binaries, and I need to adapt it
> so that every binary will have its own prerm and postinst scripts (issue
> #315318). I tried calling the scripts debian/binaryX.{
Hi,
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> $ desktop-file-validate phasex.desktop
> bash: desktop-file-validate: command not found
apt-get install apt-file
apt-file update
apt-file search desktop-file-validate
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
José Manuel Santamaría Lema schrieb:
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subtitlecomposer
>
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
> contrib
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/5/9 Grammostola Rosea :
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 21:11:25 +0200
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
After you build the package, check the contents of debian/tmp
Use the matching paths in your own files.
I can't find an debian/
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/5/9 Grammostola Rosea :
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 21:11:25 +0200
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
After you build the package, check the contents of debian/tmp
Use the matching paths in your own files.
Thanks for the response Patrick. It turns out that I was omitting to copy
the prerm/postinst scripts (to debian/X/DEBIAN/). I'm used to debhelper
which does this automatically, but in this case I'm dealing with a bare bones
makefile.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.d
Good day, dear mentors. A week ago I've the RFS about libbash package.
Since noone replied, I'm resending the request.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Subject: RFS: libbash
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
> libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> * debian/control:
> - - Out of date standards-version
Fixed
>
> * debian/changelog:
> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be
part of the proje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> * debian/changelog:
>> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
> Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be
> part of the project tree (with all of the consequences I know about
> it). Does n
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> <-- quote
> # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
>
> You should only use a native Debian package when it is clear that the
> package would only ever be of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir
> is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and
> then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian
> dir and proceed?
Hi Paul and all others
Here some further notes on the issues you mentioned!
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:14:54AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:12:06PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I uploaded
Hai Zaar wrote:
> Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir
> is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and
> then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian
> dir and proceed?
>
I don't know how you are creating the tarb
Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
* Package name: cppcheck
Version : 1.25-1
Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki
Reijo Tomperi
* URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/
* License : GP
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
All done:
1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
etc.) as soon we'll d
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Hai Zaar wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I
Good time of a day, dear mentors!
This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authnz-external.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM
Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am l
Good time of a day, dear mentors!
This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.1
Hi,
shiki-colors-murrine 3.9.1 was released. I have updated the
package and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net.
The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shiki-colors-murrine/shiki-colors-murrine_3.9.1-1
Cheers,
Benjamin
signature.asc
Description: Die
Hello,
Could you please help in trying to resolve this issues with packaging
scmbug ?
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:16 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scmbug".
> >
> > * Package name: scmbug
> > Version : 0.26.13
> > Upstream Author : Kristis
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi
>> wrote:
>>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
>> All done:
>> 1. I've decid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>
I would welcome this step :)
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@l
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>>
>
> I would welcome this step :)
All done. Reuploaded.
Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I
Kristis Makris wrote:
>On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:16 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
>What do I need to do to change the package into being non-native ?
>How/where do I specify the non-native version number ?
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
(short answer: in deb
Hi there.
I just caught this, and I'm talking about the quote without even reading
its current version.
On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> <-- quote
> # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
(...)
> But linda, l
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 20:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> > <-- quote
> > # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
> (...)
> > But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> At this time I was again in contact with Alexey, the upstream author.
> He explained me the following regarding the icons:
>
> 8><
>> The "icon" udav.png is generated
In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for
>> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution.
>> quote -->
>
>Those packages are used by distributions
2009/5/11 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. :
> In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for
>>> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution.
>>> quote -->
>>
Dear mentors,
Imagine a really large supercomputer with all processing requirements
you will ever need! This has little to do with my package "fluidsynth",
but now that I cheered you up, you can thank me by uploading it! (Well,
at least I tried...)
Anyway, Fluidsynth plays an important part of Li
Thanks for the review; I'll get right to work. A few bullet points:
* Is there anyone out there who is willing to sponsor this package? It'll
take some time for me to tidy up the package (and I will certainly contact the
scim/ibus guys) but if there are any bilingual mentors especially w.r.t
38 matches
Mail list logo
