Re: Remove self from Alioth

2011-10-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Jason Heeris wrote: I have an account on Alioth, but I'm no longer using or contributing to Debian. Can I remove or deactivate my account, or should I just abandon it? You should file a support request to get it removed, see

Re: RFS: instead

2011-10-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Jakub, On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:17:12AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de, 2011-10-12, 09:12: Your debian/rules file basically needs to be rewritten. Sorry, but that's not helpful. Care to elaborate what's so inherently wrong with the current debian/rules? I

Re: RFR: devilspie2

2011-10-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: (in this case - RFR = Request For Review - I am not sure if its a used/correct abbreviation) Correct. Could someone please check out my devilspie2 package? Yes. It is a continuation of the original Devilspie by Ross Burton,

RFS: aspsms-t

2011-10-14 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package: * Package name: aspsms-t Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Marco Balmer ma...@balmer.name * URL : http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t * License : GPLv2 Description :

RFS: jabber-querybot

2011-10-14 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package: * Package name: jabber-querybot Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Marco Balmer ma...@balmer.name * URL : http://github.com/micressor/jabber-querybot * License : GPLv2 Description

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-14 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote: Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it? Problem is: I can't

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-14 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just to tell which parts can possibly go wrong as well as history of previous problems and mistakes. I'm running

Re: RFR: devilspie2

2011-10-14 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
On 14/10/11 08:26, Helmut Grohne wrote: I could (amongst other stuff) take some hints regarding the short/long descriptions. Both of your descriptions focus on explaining how devilspie2 does things. A user first looking at your package wants to know what your package does. Your short

Re: RFS: ESO Common Pipeline Library

2011-10-14 Thread Ole Streicher
Am 13.10.2011 20:55, schrieb Julian Taylor: On 10/13/2011 06:04 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: Am 12.10.2011 20:20, schrieb Julian Taylor: Else the package looks nice, good work. I implemented all changes from you and Sylvestre and re-uploaded the package: it still does not build. Its missing

RFS: gentoo (New upstream version of a package already in Debian)

2011-10-14 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gentoo. * Package name: gentoo Version : 0.19.12-1 Upstream Author : Emil Brink e...@obsession.se * URL : http://www.obsession.se/gentoo/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : x11 It builds those

dmaths: 30 days waiting for sponsor (package already in Debian)

2011-10-14 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Hi! I have updated the package dmaths to close a bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620942) so as to fix some lintian messages. Now we just need someone encourage to review the package and upload the file. Best regars! I. De Marchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RFS: spice-vdagent (2nd try)

2011-10-14 Thread Liang Guo
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package spice-vdagent. * Package name: spice-vdagent Version : 0.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com * URL : http://www.spice-space.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It

Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

2011-10-14 Thread Igor Pashev
I'm building a package with: 64-bits app (foo), 64-bits lib (libfoo) and 32-bits lib (lib32foo). foo is linked with libfoo, but dependency in DEBIAN/control is set to li32foo. What's the matter? dpkg 1.16.1 DH 8.9.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

2011-10-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Igor Pashev wrote: I'm building a package with: 64-bits app (foo), 64-bits lib (libfoo) and 32-bits lib (lib32foo). Please use multiarch instead of doing that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to