On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
'new': a sponsorship request for a brand new package,
'update': a sponsorship request for an update to a
Hi!
Am 25.01.2012 08:58, schrieb Vasudev Kamath:
I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I've
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:27 +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
[..]
How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neither
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:49 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
fine on the pbuilder clean
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Would something as simple as Requests for package review and
sponsorship be appropriate?
That's fine for me, assuming it's ok with everyone else.
It's fine for me as well.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help.
On Mon, January 23, 2012 7:49 pm, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
debian/control:
* Homepage: There is an extra space after the website URL, better to
remove it. You could add the final / too, although that is not required
Fixed this.
should
tags 656755 +patch
thanks
While I really agree to this statement I think there is few chance that
somebody else will step in. We are just needing to maintain this as a
predependency for two important packages of the Debian Med team.
Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in
Hi Andreas,
Shall we have a crack at this on Saturday?
If you can't handle this then I don't think you are competant to be
maintaining this package in debian. Knowing how the components of
the software they are packaging fit together and how to fix the
build systems to produce packages
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh m...@medhamsh.org wrote:
Hi,
I have done possible changes. Hoping for more help.
Hello,
DISCLAIMER:
I don't know if i am supposed to review packages since
(a)I cant upload to debian.
(b)I myself am a maintainer of just one package :).
My intention is
Hi Peter,
many thanks for the patch which was in fact helpful to solve the problem.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +, peter green wrote:
Ok I took pity on you and took a look at the Makefile.am in that
directory, turns out it wasn't that hard to disable building of the
CPU with SSE
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stummvoll mich...@stummi.org wrote:
I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package:
* dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe.
* included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package.
* changed slock to
Hello List:
Yesterday I upload my package with dput at http://mentors.debian.net :
the uploading worked fine, and mentors.debian.net sent me a email.
But it appeared that the URL of my package,
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtool ,
is somehow wrong as there is some kind of interference:
Hi!
lguignard.deb...@gmail.com lguignard.deb...@gmail.com writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dhcp-probe.
* Package name: dhcp-probe
Version : 1.3.0-10
Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman network...@princeton.edu
* URL :
Hello,
On Wed, January 25, 2012 5:01 pm, harish badrinath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Medhamsh m...@medhamsh.org wrote:
complains, only about a missing changelog. Upstream does not seem to ship
a changelog with the distribution tarball/zip file.
There seems a changelog in the
Dear GCC Maintainers,
Perhaps I should have CC'd you in the first place, but here's a copy now:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:38 AM
Subject: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
Hence, please add a sponsorship-requests pseudo-package with
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from
unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in
experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package?
Matthias
On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Dear
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed
from unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as
found in experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the
Dear all,
I uploaded to mentors a new version of apt-spy [1]. After the Paul
Wise's kind review [2] [3] I reworked the package and switched to
git.debian.org both for upstream work and debian work. I need a review
of the package before going on with the upload. I know the package is
not lintian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 18:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
So I feel stuck:
is there a way to fix this issue ?
despite it, can I begin to look for a sponsor ?
I just fixed that. Please re-upload your package and you will be the
owner of it. Of course this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package not-yet-commons-ssl.
* Package name: not-yet-commons-ssl
Version : 0.3.9-1
Upstream Author : Julius Davies
* URL
Hello List:
I have just tried to re-upload my package, but without success:
I get the message:
Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net
Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes
I guess that something has to be reset.
Jerome
On 25/01/12 22:11, Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on mentors.debian.net
Nothing more to do for bibtool_2.53-1_amd64.changes
Remove the .upload file or pass -f to dput. That's a local error.
- --
with kind
Thanks for the prompt reply:
the re-upload finally succeeded.
Now I will step forward: find a sponsor.
Jerome
On 25/01/12 23:23, Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 23:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Package has already been uploaded to debexpo on
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package skstream:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skstream
/skstream_0.3.8-1.dsc
It builds these binary packages:
libskstream-0.3-6 - iostream-based C++ socket library
Dear mentors, dear TeX maintainers:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtool.
* Package name: bibtool
Version : 2.53-1
Upstream Author :Gerd Neugebauer g...@gerd-neugebauer.de
* URL
:http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html
*
Howdy!
INADD, so I can't sposor
I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
## --- ##
## confdefs.h. ##
## --- ##
/* confdefs.h */
#define PACKAGE_NAME skstream
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME skstream
#define PACKAGE_VERSION 0.3.8
#define
On a rebuild it worked.
Something odd's going on here.
-T
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Howdy!
INADD, so I can't sposor
I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
## --- ##
## confdefs.h. ##
##
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 657393 affects + skstream
Unknown tag/s: affects, skstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 657393 affects + src:skstream
Unknown tag/s: affects, src:skstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
affects 657393 + src:skstream
Bug #657393 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: skstream/0.3.6-1 [ITA] -- IOStream C++
socket Library
Added indication that 657393 affects src:skstream
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 653977 by 657393
Bug #653977 [wnpp] ITA: skstream -- Isostream C++ socket library
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 653977: 657393
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Dear Paul
Thank you for your review.
I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields
pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please
consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the
same mistake.
Done. I removed the comment.
You might
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package v8cgi, for which I'm also
the upstream author.
v8cgi is a multi-purpose wrapper around V8 Javascript engine: it can
be used as a shell-scripting language/environment, CGI/FastCGI binary
or Apache module. It resembles Node.js, but comes with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package surf. This package is
orphaned and I've prepared a QA upload for the same. The package can
be downloaded with
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/surf/surf_0.4.1-5.dsc
This
35 matches
Mail list logo
