Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id 87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id 87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id 87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id 87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Dear mentors,
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspsms-t/aspsms-t_1.3.0-1.dsc
Changes since last upload:
* lib/ASPSMS/Storage.pm: Change to IO::File functions.
* lib/ASPSMS/Storage.pm: Closes github issue: #1
* README: Update documentation
Thanks, -Marco
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my
first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ?
Will it confuse some Debian robots ?
It's
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au, 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the
Hi,
Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
announced,
On 02/13/2012 07:14 AM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
+1
--
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca
--
To
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package trash-cli.
I talked with Steve Stalcup (the current maintainer, but he's not a
DD), with Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (who packaged trash-cli previously on
mentors) and with Andrea Francia (the upstream author) and I packaged
the latest
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
Hi,
Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu écrivit :
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
Hi,
This scheme is something I was
Hi,
just a comment on this: I suspect a multiarch issue and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/06/msg2.html
Multiarch handling of header files (/usr/include) will require
more per-package attention, ...
so Luis is asking for some hints how to deal with this like the
Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
(see my when it makes sense comment above).
But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
prefer a new version on mentors. That
Dear mentors,
Pierre Habouzit (the former maintainer) uploaded the changes to the VCS.
(http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/tokyocabinet.git;a=summary)
So DDs, please go ahead and please sponsor the upload.
Best regards,
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
(see my when it makes sense comment above).
But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
Nicolas Dandrimont nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org writes:
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu écrivit :
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the
Hello,
What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
debian directory ?
I've not found any documentation about it, except for debian/rules.
Regards,
Fred.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
debian directory ?
Usual 644/755 I suppose, what makes you think about different perms?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Mail original -
De: Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name
À: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 13 Février 2012 16:16:12
Objet: Re: Files permission in the debian directory
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
What are the recommended permissions for
fre...@free.fr writes:
What I especially like to know if this should be group-writable, but
maybe it's not important.
They should not be. There is no reason to use anything but 644/755,
respectively.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Ok, thanks.
- Mail original -
De: Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu
À: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 13 Février 2012 17:35:37
Objet: Re: Files permission in the debian directory
fre...@free.fr writes:
What I especially like to know if this should be group-writable, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 13.02.2012 17:55, fre...@free.fr wrote:
They should not be. There is no reason to use anything but 644/755,
respectively.
Except debehelper in compatibility mode 9. There, debhelper
configuration files can be scripts (as you know), which
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nginx.
It's a backport of the package which is available on Debian Testing.
* Package name: nginx
* Version : 1.1.14-1~bpo60+1
* Section : httpd
It builds those binary packages:
nginx - small, but very powerful
hello jasem,
i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:
* you already require debhelper 6, is there any reason you
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mpd-sima.
* Package name: mpd-sima
Version : 0.9.0-1~1.gbp3e591f
Upstream Author : Jack Kaliko
* URL : http://codingteam.net/project/sima
* License :
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org, 2012-02-13, 20:07:
I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a release of
the package, since at that point interested people (e.g. reviewers)
can rely on it, and the version should refer uniquely to what I
uploaded at that time.
Be aware,
hello raúl,
i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:
* as your upstream tarball contains the whole
Arno Töll deb...@toell.net writes:
Except debehelper in compatibility mode 9. There, debhelper
configuration files can be scripts (as you know), which are determined
by the +x bit.
That's covered by 755. But executable dh files are not for the faint of
heart, nor for beginners who need to ask
* installing by just copying python files to /usr/share/themole is far
from elegant.
Uh? This is the idiomatic way to install Python applications.
there is no byte-compilation of files, unless themole gets invoked by
root (which in term is a bad thing itself as /usr/share gets written to
at
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr a écrit :
What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
debian directory ?
I've not found any documentation about it, except for debian/rules.
Dear Fred,
the Dpkg source format version 1.0 does not
Hello List:
I am beginning to play with pbuilder by following th maint-guide:
right now my p[ersonal ]building is polluted by my CONFIG_SITE:
what is the best way to discard it from the pbuilder machinery ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Dear all,
I'm preparing matterial and need to notify command in debian.I guess
it's renamed, do you know its new name?
--mohsen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello Again:
It appears that CONFIG_SITE is used by dpkg-builpackage:
the issue can be easily overcome by using debuild instead as debuild unset
CONFIG_SITE.
Can pbuilder use debuild instead of dpkg-builpackage ?
Thanks,
Jerome
On 14/02/12 03:57, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List:
I am
Hi:
On 14/02/12 05:16, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Again:
It appears that CONFIG_SITE is used by dpkg-builpackage:
the issue can be easily overcome by using debuild instead as debuild unset
CONFIG_SITE.
Can pbuilder use debuild instead of dpkg-builpackage ?
This is a silly question as
36 matches
Mail list logo
