Re: sponsorship-requests

2012-02-17 Thread Savvas Radevic
Looking at http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS I see we need to tag the new packages with [NEW]. I've seen some bugs with [ITP], so which one should we use, [NEW] or [ITP]?

Processed: retitle 658032 to RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 [NEW] -- library for handling and rendering XPS documents

2012-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 658032 RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 [NEW] -- library for handling and rendering XPS documents Bug #658032 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 -- library for handling and rendering XPS documents [NEW] Changed Bug title to 'RFS:

Bug#660194: RFS: drwright/3.2.4-1 [NEW] -- Typing monitor to force typing breaks

2012-02-17 Thread Savvas Radevic
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package drwright. * Package name : drwright Version : 3.2.4-1 Upstream Author : * URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/drwright and http://live.gnome.org/drwright * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : gnome

Re: sponsorship-requests

2012-02-17 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
Le 17/02/2012 à 10:44, Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com écrivit : Looking at http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS I see we need to tag the new packages with [NEW]. I've seen some bugs with [ITP], so which one should we use, [NEW] or [ITP]? Hi! The correct tag is [ITP]. I've clarified on the

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Tobias Frost wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht: And it doesn't build for me in a clean chroot, I get the following error (full build log attached): well, that's strange... My packages are always pdebuild-checked and I built it successfully on amd64,

RFS: openscad

2012-02-17 Thread chrysn
hello michael, hello mentors, after almost exactly two years of packaging, efforts by numerous people from both debian (especially -legal) and openscad, and a license change from the openscad dependency CGAL which could have saved us much trouble, i now consider my openscad package ready for

Bug#659822: RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.0-1 (New upstream version)

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Jakub, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Geoffroy Youri Berret ef...@azylum.org, 2012-02-17, 00:41: - In debian/mpd-sima.postrm, you use awk but you don't Depend on it. Right, I replaced it with a “grep | cut” alternative. While I personally don't like awk :P, but if you like it, you _can_ use it in

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/17/2012 03:13 AM, Werner Detter wrote: Did you ask zigo who sponsored your last upload? sure i did. But he just became a father so he had no time left for uploading the package. Also, I'm busy with other packages, and did that last upload because I thought it was important that

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Tobias, As promised, here's my review of your package: - In debian/solarpowerlog.default, you define /etc/solarpowerlog as the default RUNDIR; what files is your program expecting to find there, HTML templates? If so, installing some default templates in /usr/share/solarpowerlog

Bug#659822: RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.0-1 (New upstream version)

2012-02-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org, 2012-02-17, 12:01: - In debian/mpd-sima.postrm, you use awk but you don't Depend on it. Right, I replaced it with a “grep | cut” alternative. While I personally don't like awk :P, but if you like it, you _can_ use it in maintainer scripts without

Processed: your mail

2012-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 660175 wishlist Bug #660175 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fcgi-daemon Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' severity 660014 wishlist Bug #660014 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: git-ftp -- Git powered FTP client written as shell script

Bug#659822: RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.0-1 (New upstream version)

2012-02-17 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Le 17/02/2012 01:28, Jakub Wilk a écrit : * Geoffroy Youri Berret ef...@azylum.org, 2012-02-17, 00:41: - In debian/mpd-sima.postrm, you use awk but you don't Depend on it. Right, I replaced it with a “grep | cut” alternative. While I personally don't like awk :P, but if you like it, you

Re: How to transition to a new UID?

2012-02-17 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 19:12 +0100, Arno Töll wrote: On 14.02.2012 13:48, Wolodja Wentland wrote: Following the discussion in [2] and most importantly [3] it seems as if the primary UID is not really important as any UID is acceptable if the real name matches. I can confirm that. That's

Bug#660162: sponsorship-requests: RFS: tack/1.07-2

2012-02-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-16, 19:29: The 'tack' program is a diagnostic tool that is designed to create and verify the correctness of terminfo's. This program can be used to create new terminal descriptions that are not included in the standard ncurses release. I'll take a

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna-1.0.23+dfsg-1 (new upstream version)

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Benoît Knecht wrote: * Package name: minidlna Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ * git : git://gitorious.org/debian-pkg/minidlna.git git-web

Bug#660162: sponsorship-requests: RFS: tack/1.07-2

2012-02-17 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-16, 19:29: tack (1.07-2) unstable; urgency=low tack (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low Please merge these two into a single 1.07-1. How about this:

Re: RFS: shaarli

2012-02-17 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Mentors, I have now updated the package to the newest version 0.0.38beta and uploaded it to mentors.d.n. FYI version 0.0.37beta introduced a new JavaScript library that wasn't yet packaged in Debian, so I have first worked on getting it packaged in Debian. To co-maintain this new package, I

RFS: kismet -- updated and adopted package abandoned for 3 years

2012-02-17 Thread Nick Andrik
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kismet. I have adopted the package which was abandoned for 3 years, updated to the latest upstream version and made some heavy maintenance on the packaging itself. * Package name: kismet Version : 2011.03.R2-1

Re: RFS: kismet -- updated and adopted package abandoned for 3 years

2012-02-17 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 17.02.2012 23:00, Nick Andrik wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package kismet. I have adopted the package which was abandoned for 3 years, In fact you don't try to adopt, but to hijack it. The package is not officially orphaned

repacking howto

2012-02-17 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: Is the following howto http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/repacking.html still relevant ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#658032: RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 [NEW] -- library for handling and rendering XPS documents

2012-02-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Savvas, Savvas Radevic wrote: Description: library for handling and rendering XPS documents (library) This library is being used by evince to read XPS documents. What's an XPS document? From Wikipedia I've learned that this is somehow related to the Open XML Paper Specification aka

Bug#660314: [sponsorship-requests] RFS: nbc/1.2.1.r4+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Compiler for LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks

2012-02-17 Thread Slavko
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nbc. dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nbc/nbc_1.2.1.r4+dfsg-1.dsc It builds those binary packages: nbc - Compiler for LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks More

Re: repacking howto

2012-02-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Jermome On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 03:34:13AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Is the following howto http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/repacking.html still relevant ? This is one possibility to do it. We in the Debian Perl Group are using this procedure/ howto in our packages when