Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package identicurse.
* Package name: identicurse
Version : 0.9+dfsg0-1
Upstream Author : Psquid, Reality
* URL : http://identicurse.net/
* License : GPL-3+
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package browserlauncher2.
* Package name: browserlauncher2
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Jeff Chapman svalida...@yahoo.com
* URL : http://browserlaunch2.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL-2
Section
seed currently FTBFS on sparc with a bus error.
I've reproduced this on a sparc box that Tom Theisen made available
(thanks tom) but i'm kinda stuck on how to debug it.
Any ideas on how to debug this? Normally i'd start by turning down the
optimisation but this package doesn't seem to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 660982 RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITA] - simple Identi.ca client
with a curses-based UI
Bug #660982 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITP] - simple
Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI
Changed Bug title to 'RFS:
Why did I file the RFS as ITP? :) Thanks for the correction, Benoît.
I'll have to start doing the block # with # thing as well.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package themole.
* Package name: themole
Version : 0.2.6-1
Upstream Authors: Santiago Alessandri salessan...@nasel.com.ar
Matías Fontaninimfontan...@nasel.com.ar
Gastón Traberg
Hi,
I want to add some additional examples to the debconf templates in my
package nullmailer. The examples would only change config file entries
(for the nullmailer/relayhost entry), and shouldn't need translating -
they would be the same in all languages.
I note that if I run debconf-updatepo,
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
(replying on -mentors)
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Having multiarch packages and ia32-libs installed will lead to some
confusion. The runtime linker will not be able to differentiate between
multiarch or ia32-libs libs. One of
Thibaut Paumard mlotpot.n...@free.fr writes:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch
On 2012-02-22 at 13:22:53 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Elena ``of Valhalla'' valha...@trueelena.org, 2012-02-22, 12:23:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gnupg/python-gnupg_0.2.8-1.dsc
[many different problems]
Thanks for your comments, I'm going to fix the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:30:45AM +, peter green wrote:
seed currently FTBFS on sparc with a bus error.
I've reproduced this on a sparc box that Tom Theisen made available
(thanks tom) but i'm kinda stuck on how to debug it.
Any ideas on how to debug this? Normally i'd start by
* Elena ``of Valhalla'' valha...@trueelena.org, 2012-02-23, 15:58:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gnupg/python-gnupg_0.2.8-1.dsc
[many different problems]
Thanks for your comments, I'm going to fix the package and reupload it.
One question: should I increase the
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Raúl Benencia rbenen...@linti.unlp.edu.ar, 2012-02-23, 09:40:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/themole/themole_0.2.6-1.dsc
Why priority extra?
You build depend on debhelper (= 9.0.0), but debhelper doesn't use
such versioning scheme
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:46:34PM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package wavemon.
* Package name: wavemon
Version : 0.7.3-1
I'd certainly like to see an updated wavemon package in the archive. However,
Rene Englehard is still listed as the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:53:50AM -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:46:34PM +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package wavemon.
* Package name: wavemon
Version : 0.7.3-1
I'd certainly like to see an updated
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-20, 14:50:
* Bump debhelper build-depends: to (= 7.0.50~), since we use
override_dh_foo targets.
This should be omitted from the changelog, given that it's…
* Add support for dpkg-buildflags(1) by bumping debhelper to
compatibility level 9.
Hi,
Le 23/02/2012 10:23, Nick Leverton a écrit :
I want to add some additional examples to the debconf templates in my
package nullmailer.
Is this really necessary?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#s6.5.1
The examples would only change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
again I have made some updates to apt-build regarding missing
sourceslist and / or sourcesparts directory. I bumped debhelper mode to
9 and Standards version to 3.9.3.
I removed any conffiles (as they are dynamically created resource
18 matches
Mail list logo
