Hi,
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ember-media/ember-media_0.6.2.1-1.dsc
Thanks for reminding me that I still have to look at this package.
There is not much to comment:
- Where does License: GPL-2+ for
quoting Jakub Wilk:
But next reconf-inetd run can happen a month later. (Or never.) In the mean
time, nyancat server won't be running, will it? Or did I misunderstand
something?
That's right. I take responsibility for that; I didn't realise that the
postinst script would run after the
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:37:03 +0200
with message-id 4fc9fadf.5080...@gmx.de
and subject line closing RFS: allegro4.4/2:4.4.2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #673345,
regarding RFS: allegro4.4/2:4.4.2-1 [ITA] -- portable library for
cross-platform game and multimedia
On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:26:43 +, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2012 20:01:27 +0200, Alexander Toresson wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.5-1 of the package
fceu.
What a coincidence, I was just about to send you an email with various
comments on your
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:37:37 +0800
with message-id
CAMr=8w67g4hffuVoKVkCds6aW7wCpgVJPsJHvU=Q29eLn_kg=q...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug #675226 RFS: rsskit/0.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #675226,
regarding RFS: rsskit/0.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This
On 02/06/12 12:29, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
In any case, the solution is simple: invoke reconf-inetd right after
update-inetd in postinst.
That is a simple solution, thanks.
On a different topic, nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1 checks for only a
specific release:
if [ $2 =
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
2) Handling of the transition
I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
.gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
On 02/06/12 15:19, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Thanks for the comments; I'll upload a new version which forces a
reconf-inetd update in a few minutes.
Uploaded.
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:14:38 +
with message-id e1saqym-0007lg...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: flactag/2.0.2-1 ITP #507876
has caused the Debian Bug report #669373,
regarding RFS: flactag/2.0.2-1 ITP #507876
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:14:38 +
with message-id e1saqym-0007le...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #669585,
regarding RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.20-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:14:38 +
with message-id e1saqym-0007le...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #669585,
regarding RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.20-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 15:19:
if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1.0+git20120523.99dc310-1; then
Shouldn't it be s/lt/lt-nl/?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 02/06/12 17:19, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Shouldn't it be s/lt/lt-nl/?
What difference does it make? Surely if the package was not previously
installed, the grep match would fail, making the rest of the postinst no-op.
Jon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 17:42:
Shouldn't it be s/lt/lt-nl/?
What difference does it make? Surely if the package was not previously
installed, the grep match would fail, making the rest of the postinst
no-op.
Well, the line could have been added by user, in which
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:27:30PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote [edited]:
[..]
I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call.
Wouldn't it be nice if the postinst also take care of the case when the
user enabled the service?
the line I'm suggesting in dep9 is:
if fgrep -q '^exact entry
Hi Björn,
The package is no longer at mentors. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 2 June 2012 18:23, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
But using lt has benefits too: if the user removed old nyancat-server, then
installing the new one would clean after the buggy postrm.
Thanks for the explanation, seems reasonable.
I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call.
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 19:27:
I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call.
Wouldn't it be nice if the postinst also take care of the case when
the user enabled the service?
Couldn't both of these issues be addressed by removing '#off# ' from
the grep?
I
Jon
And why is your rfs important there are no critical or security related
updates. ?
In your changelog you evan say urgency=low
Just my 2 cents
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jonathan McCrohan [mailto:jmccro...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zaterdag 2 juni 2012 2:55
Aan:
retitle 673096 RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1
severity 673096 normal
stop
Hi Jonathan,
Please remove the part (closes: #674844) from debian/changelog. Bug 674844
is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not solved by
uploading version 2.2.5-1 to unstable. Please keep 674844 open until
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 673096 RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1
Bug #673096 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1 [RC]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1' from 'RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1 [RC]'
severity 673096 normal
Bug #673096 [sponsorship-requests] RFS:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:03:33PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 19:27:
I would add -x/--line-regexp to the fgrep call.
Wouldn't it be nice if the postinst also take care of the case when
the user enabled the service?
Couldn't both of these
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: minor
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ptop
* Package name: ptop
Version : 3.6.2-7
Upstream Author : Mark Wong mark...@gmail.com
* URL : http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/
* License : BSD
Thanks to Bart, I corrected the version number.
The dget link is now:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ebtables/ebtables_2.0.10.4-0.1.dsc
--
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 02/06/12 20:08, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
And why is your rfs important there are no critical or security related
updates. ?
It closes #674844. That looks serious to me.
In your changelog you evan say urgency=low
The package is changing sections, hence it will have to enter NEW.
[Whoops, missed this reply, it wasn't threaded properly.]
On 02/06/12 20:26, Bart Martens wrote:
Please remove the part (closes: #674844) from debian/changelog. Bug 674844
is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not solved by
uploading version 2.2.5-1 to unstable. Please
Hi Aron,
Adam provided a version of qpdfview under GPL-2
(with translations removed) and I built an
updated package, which I uploaded on mentors.
The Version is 0.3~beta2 but is, according to
Adam, close to the 0.3 release to come, for
which he is still waiting for some translation
work.
I hope
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:33:31PM +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:03:33PM +, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-02, 19:27:
BTW, shouldn't you use --pattern (instead of, or maybe in addition to,
--multi)?
--patern is not
On 02/06/12 19:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I think we do need -x (or an equivalent of it). If the user appended
some options to nyancat-server command-line, we must not remove such entry.
BTW, shouldn't you use --pattern (instead of, or maybe in addition to,
--multi)?
I've uploaded a new version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 675487 RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-0.1 [NMU]
Bug #675487 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1.1 [NMU]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-0.1 [NMU]' from 'RFS:
ebtables/2.0.10.4-1.1 [NMU]'
stop
Stopping processing here.
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
[Whoops, missed this reply, it wasn't threaded properly.]
On 02/06/12 20:26, Bart Martens wrote:
Please remove the part (closes: #674844) from debian/changelog. Bug
674844
is for version 2.2.2-1 in stable. That bug in stable is not solved by
Jochen Friedrich wrote via private e-mail that he prefers that William Dauchy
adds himself to Uploaders instead of doing an NMU.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Bastiaan,
Please have another look at the list of architectures.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop
Uploaded: 2012-06-02 19:35
* Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
because they alway fail
Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel
33 matches
Mail list logo
