Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 05:58:56 +
with message-id 20120627055856.gd12...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: cd-discid/1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667607,
regarding RFS: cd-discid/1.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:01:13 +
with message-id 20120627060113.ge12...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: gyoto/0.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669016,
regarding RFS: gyoto/0.0.3-1 [ITP] -- general relativistic ray-tracing and
orbit computation
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:02:44 +
with message-id 20120627060244.gf12...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: yp-svipc/0.14-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #669209,
regarding RFS: yp-svipc/0.14-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for
Python/Yorick
to be
I have replied toSteven privately. I look forward to this package
being in Debian but I don't think it will be very quick.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 679205 by 679201
Bug #679205 [wnpp] ITA: mysqltuner -- high-performance MySQL tuning script
679205 was not blocked by any bugs.
679205 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 679205: 679201
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hi Bart,
Yes, it's bug 560244 ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with
cluster support
Regard,
Steven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 672701 clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
clearwaita-theme/1.0-1 [ITP]'
thanks
Stopping
José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I took a look at your package:
First of all, thanks for your quick answer :-)
You're welcome :)
- Since you're packaging a snapshot version, you should adjust your
watch file accordingly:
Processing
Hi,
Package updated and re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net to reflect the comment by
Bart Martens:
The information of version 0.2.6-1.1 is missing in debian/changelog.
Please, consider sponsoring.
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
El 27/06/12 12:48, Benoît Knecht escribió:
I just meant that you should use something like opts=dversionmangle (see
uscan(1)) so that uscan would remove the +20120619git27g55c0f4e part
before comparing the debian version with the upstream one. But if you're
not going to package snapshot
Hello Gregor.
Uploaded now (to DELAYED/2); closing an RC bug and having a recent
powertop in Debian seem like two good reasons :)
Thank you very much.
With best regards,
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Vaidya wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package the-powder-toy
* Package name: the-powder-toy
Version : 78.1-1
Upstream Author : HardWIRED and respective owners
* URL : http://powdertoy.co.uk/
* License : GPL-3
Section
Hello,
On Sun, 13 May 2012 01:16:40 +0200
Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
Source: clearwaita-theme
Description: Clearwaita theme
Clearwaita is a GTK2/GTK3 theme. Files for GTK3 are a modified
version of Adwaita, the default GNOME 3 theme, to make it visually
close to Clearlooks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 672701 RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Bug #672701 [sponsorship-requests] clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]' from
'clearlooks-phenix-theme/2.0.5-1 [ITP]'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 560244 by 679107
Bug #560244 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster
support
Bug #585877 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster
support
560244 was not blocked by any bugs.
560244 was not
Hi everybody,
my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except
(from packages.qa.debian.org):
The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
(Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.2).
So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:59:35PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
Hi everybody,
my package is already in unstable/testing. No bugs, everything clean except
(from packages.qa.debian.org):
The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy
(Standards-Version 3.9.3
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage.
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
Hi,
So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and create
a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze ?
If you would upload a new package with only that number changed, then it is,
in
my opinion, not worth the trouble.
The only thing that would
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage.
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:16:03 +0300
with message-id 826061340831...@web13e.yandex.ru
and subject line Re: exactimage: file format misdetection
has caused the Debian Bug report #679321,
regarding RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs
to be marked as done.
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:18:14 Schrober wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:51:01 you wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage.
It builds those binary packages:
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:27:03 +0300
with message-id 1340836023.17806.13.ca...@freedom.lan
and subject line RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help
has caused the Debian Bug report #677622,
regarding RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 [ITA] -- Debian online help
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package glipper
* Package name: glipper
Version : 2.3-3
Upstream Author : Laszlo Pandy
* URL : https://launchad.net/glipper
* License : GNU GPL v2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qemplayer
* Package name : qemplayer
Version : 12.5-1.1
Upstream Author : William Brana
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/qemplayer/
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bzr-email
* Package name: bzr-email
Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd
* URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email
* License : GPL-2+
Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
So is it worth to bump the Standards-Versions from 3.9.2 to 3.9.3 and
create a new package so that it's totally clean for the squeeze-freeze
?
I don't think so. I take that notice as something to be done as part of
the next release of the
28 matches
Mail list logo
