On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and
lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them sooner
than later and provide a proper upgrade path to multiarch
packages. What's the best way to achieve
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base.
This upload would fix #667868.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc
Changes since the last upload to unstable:
gnustep-base
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:42:09 +0200
with message-id 20120704154208.gb9...@genesis.home.trueelena.org
and subject line uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #679420,
regarding RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:15:05 -0700
with message-id 20120704151505.ga13...@ftbfs.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #680193,
regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:20:28 +
with message-id e1smsjx-0004v7...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #679739,
regarding RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
The recently uploaded 1.22.1-3 FTBFS on all x86 archs because Debian
autobuilders attempt to use the build-arch target and patches are not
applied in this case. A trivial fix is included, apologies for the
snafu.
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:30:33 -0700
with message-id 20120704163033.ga13...@ftbfs.org
and subject line Uploaded terminal.app/0.9.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677507,
regarding RFS: terminal.app/0.9.8-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:29:00 -0700
with message-id 20120704172900.ga13...@ftbfs.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680257: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #680257,
regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors,
which I can reproduce locally:
W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0
W: liblastfm0: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:03:57PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors,
which I can reproduce locally:
W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0
W: liblastfm0:
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:36:19 +
with message-id e1smvn5-0007cr...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #677354,
regarding RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hey
I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package,
(O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to
current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and
enabled hardening in the build. (It hadn't been updated since 2009
previously,
On 2012-07-04 22:14, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
Hey
Hi,
I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package,
(O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to
current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and
enabled hardening in
Hi Daniel,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:45:07 +
with message-id 20120705044507.gb9...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: narval/1.14.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677491,
regarding RFS: narval/1.14.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
15 matches
Mail list logo