Re: [Multiarch-devel] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0,dev}?

2012-07-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them sooner than later and provide a proper upgrade path to multiarch packages. What's the best way to achieve

Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]

2012-07-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base. This upload would fix #667868. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload to unstable: gnustep-base

Bug#679420: marked as done (RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1)

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:42:09 +0200 with message-id 20120704154208.gb9...@genesis.home.trueelena.org and subject line uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #679420, regarding RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#680193: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC])

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:15:05 -0700 with message-id 20120704151505.ga13...@ftbfs.org and subject line Re: Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #680193, regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#679739: marked as done (RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC])

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:20:28 + with message-id e1smsjx-0004v7...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #679739, regarding RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#680257: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC]

2012-07-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important The recently uploaded 1.22.1-3 FTBFS on all x86 archs because Debian autobuilders attempt to use the build-arch target and patches are not applied in this case. A trivial fix is included, apologies for the snafu.

Bug#677507: marked as done (RFS: terminal.app/0.9.8-1)

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:30:33 -0700 with message-id 20120704163033.ga13...@ftbfs.org and subject line Uploaded terminal.app/0.9.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677507, regarding RFS: terminal.app/0.9.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#680257: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC])

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:29:00 -0700 with message-id 20120704172900.ga13...@ftbfs.org and subject line Re: Bug#680257: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #680257, regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

2012-07-04 Thread Asheesh Laroia
I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors, which I can reproduce locally: W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0 W: liblastfm0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

2012-07-04 Thread John Stamp
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:03:57PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors, which I can reproduce locally: W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0 W: liblastfm0:

Bug#677354: marked as done (RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC])

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:36:19 + with message-id e1smvn5-0007cr...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #677354, regarding RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

libircclient packaging (Chances to get it into Wheezy)?

2012-07-04 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
Hey I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package, (O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and enabled hardening in the build. (It hadn't been updated since 2009 previously,

Re: libircclient packaging (Chances to get it into Wheezy)?

2012-07-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-07-04 22:14, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: Hey Hi, I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package, (O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and enabled hardening in

Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [QA upload] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking

2012-07-04 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Daniel, The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#677491: marked as done (RFS: narval/1.14.3-1)

2012-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:45:07 + with message-id 20120705044507.gb9...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: narval/1.14.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677491, regarding RFS: narval/1.14.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt