Your message dated Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
with message-id e1thcil-0006zk...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #672307,
regarding RFS: libkaz/1.21-1 [ITP] please sponsor Kazlib upload
to be
Your message dated Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
with message-id e1thcil-0006yv...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #672805,
regarding RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Dear mentors, debian-science,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of ovito, which is not
targeting wheezy. The previous sponsor of ovito was Michael
Tautschnig, but Mònica Ramírez Arceda has made QA uploads recently.
* Package name: ovito
Version : 1.1.0-1~1
Upstream
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#672805: RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
It has been closed by Bart Martens ba...@debian.org.
email message attachment
Forwarded Message
From: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org
To: 672805-d...@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#672805: RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
It has been closed by Bart Martens ba...@debian.org.
email message attachment
Forwarded Message
All,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
email message attachment
Forwarded Message
From: Bart Martens
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
email message attachment
Forwarded Message
Subject: closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 +
Package hwb
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that it had
been removed. I thought there was something in place to notify people
about things like that?
Hi Pekko Metsä,
I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-27 11:46.
Why version 1.1.0-1~1 and not simply 1.1.0-1 ? Maybe I have overlooked some new
version numbering policy for experimental.
I compared this package with version 0.9.5-2, and I see more changes to the
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org
wrote:
In good old days when I had time and motivation to maintain gcc-doc, I've
used git repos
Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
(with regular package names)
2012/9/27 Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 04:02 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Samuel
Arno,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote:
On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that it had
been removed. I thought there was something
Hi,
On 27.09.2012 20:08, Robert James Clay wrote:
Arno,
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote:
On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote:
Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb
had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that
Hi there,
I'm a Debian Developer and possibly interested in reviewing and sponsoring
this! Are you still looking?
Cheers,
-- Asheesh.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org wrote:
Hi there,
I'm a Debian Developer and possibly interested in reviewing and sponsoring
this! Are you still looking?
Yes, I am! Please tell me what you think ;-)
--
http://gottengeography.ca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 01:05 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Why not just do GCC docs in a way similar to GNU Make?
Separately build docs from separate source package, and upload to non-free?
(with regular package names)
It's in a similar way to GNU Make indeed. The only difference is more
than one version
Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
recently.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
17 matches
Mail list logo
