Aw: [Help] Problems building cimg-dev Debian package

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Leidert
Andreas Tille wrote: I have some trouble with updating cimg-dev. Upstream has given some hint but this did not really helped here. Any libtiff* expert could help out to build svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/cimg/trunk/ ?? Thanks in advance for any help Andreas. -

Dead upstream - github mirror

2014-01-29 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
HI I am taking over kerneltop package, I use it a lot in various systems. The upstream webpage does not exist, also upstream authors do not respond (contacted them 3 weeks ago). The effect is that the upstream package does not have a webpage or any vcs. Is it good idea to mirror the package in my

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Alex Band
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Paul Wise escribió: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 01:44 +0100, Sebastien Badia wrote: Therefore we do anything with this package? RoQA anyway? Thanks for the explanation, it sounds like this package should remain in Debian instead of being removed, good luck with finding a

Re: Dead upstream - github mirror

2014-01-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: I am taking over kerneltop package, I use it a lot in various systems. The upstream webpage does not exist, also upstream authors do not respond (contacted them 3 weeks ago). The effect is that the upstream package does not have a

Re: Dead upstream - github mirror

2014-01-29 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Ok Ill ask on LKLM thanks. On 29 January 2014 11:40, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: I am taking over kerneltop package, I use it a lot in various systems. The upstream webpage does not exist, also upstream authors do not

Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC]

2014-01-29 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

Bug#737019: RFS: libepsilon/0.9.2-2

2014-01-29 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libepsilon Package name: libepsilon Version : 0.9.2-2 Upstream Author : Alexander Simakov xan...@entropyware.info URL :

Re: [Help] Problems building cimg-dev Debian package

2014-01-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:05:16AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: libtiff5-dev instead of libtiffxx5 is necessary if any. The control file misses this b-dependency. _Maybe_ you further need to link against -ltiffxx instead of -ltiff, but this you'll probably find out after fixing

Bug#737041: RFS: plainbox-provider-checkbox/0.3-2 -- new packaging version

2014-01-29 Thread Sylvain Pineau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package plainbox-provider-checkbox * Package name: plainbox-provider-checkbox Version : 0.3-2 Upstream Author : Sylvain Pineau sylvain.pin...@canonical.com * URL :

Bug#735550: marked as done (RFS: proot/3.2.2-1 -- emulate chroot, bind mount and binfmt_misc for non-root users)

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:28:50 + with message-id e1w8y0q-0001kb...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: proot/3.2.2-1 -- emulate chroot, bind mount and binfmt_misc for non-root users has caused the Debian Bug report #735550, regarding RFS: proot/3.2.2-1 -- emulate

Bug#737039: RFS: plainbox-provider-resource-generic/0.2-2 -- new packaging version

2014-01-29 Thread Sylvain Pineau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package plainbox-provider-resource-generic * Package name: plainbox-provider-resource-generic Version : 0.2-2 Upstream Author : Sylvain Pineau sylvain.pin...@canonical.com *

Bug#737019: marked as done (RFS: libepsilon/0.9.2-2)

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:28:50 + with message-id e1w8y0q-0001kn...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libepsilon/0.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #737019, regarding RFS: libepsilon/0.9.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#737046: RFS: entr/2.6-1

2014-01-29 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package entr * Package name: entr Version : 2.6-1 Upstream Author : Eric Radman ericsh...@eradman.com * URL : http://entrproject.org/ * License : ISC, BSD-2-Clause

Re: postgres extensions and postgres multi-version support

2014-01-29 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-29 52e94292.7000...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de If I look at other extension packages, e.g. http://packages.debian.org/de/jessie/amd64/postgresql-9.3-ip4r/filelist I can see that README.package.gz always goes to /usr/share/doc/postgresql-version-package/. Your hint,

Re: postgres extensions and postgres multi-version support

2014-01-29 Thread Florian Rothmaier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christoph, thanks a lot for your fantastic help! Am 25.01.2014 21:26, schrieb Christoph Berg: Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-24 52e2acbf.1090...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de It should be mentioned that my debian/rules is still based on an outdated

question about the packaging helpers

2014-01-29 Thread Roelof Wobben
Hello, Im trying to learn myself the debian way of packaging. My ultimate goal is to become the gnome maintainer of Tanglu. Now I wonder where detailed information can be found about the packaging helpers dh and dh7 ? Roelof

Re: question about the packaging helpers

2014-01-29 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roelof, On 29/01/14 18:48, Roelof Wobben wrote: Hello, Im trying to learn myself the debian way of packaging. My ultimate goal is to become the gnome maintainer of Tanglu. Now I wonder where detailed information can be found about the

Bug#736952: marked as done (RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC])

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:39:59 -0800 with message-id CACZd_tDmqz9Q=qF8JX-NgREGtk5nPFekX5f=5vhl-p_+pnv...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#736952: RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #736952, regarding RFS: ming/1:0.4.5-1.1 [NMU][RC] to be marked

Re: question about the packaging helpers

2014-01-29 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Hi Roelof, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: Now I wonder where detailed information can be found about the packaging helpers dh and dh7 ? http://joeyh.name/blog/entry/cdbs_killer___40__design_phase__41__/

RE: question about the packaging helpers

2014-01-29 Thread Roelof Wobben
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:36:29 -0600 Subject: Re: question about the packaging helpers From: mzagr...@d.umn.edu To: rwob...@hotmail.com CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Hi Roelof, On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: Now I wonder where

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] thanks Dear Vincent, Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. Yes, use all instead. any will cause your package to be compiled on all Debian release architectures and introduce different binary packages of gnome-shell-pomodoro for

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] thanks Dear Vincent, Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. Yes, use all instead. any will cause your package to be compiled on all Debian release

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Sebastien Badia escribió: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:38:43PM (+0100), Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: Sebastien, some comments. Your package seems to be fine, good job, but some changes are welcome. Hi Rodolfo, Thanks a lot! I will upload the package after these

Bug#722495: marked as done (RFS: mod-host/0.9-1 -- LV2 host for jackd with socket and shell control (ITP: #722491))

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:26:52 + with message-id e1w8jdi-0005lj...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mod-host/0.9-1 -- LV2 host for jackd with socket and shell control (ITP: #722491) has caused the Debian Bug report #722495, regarding RFS: mod-host/0.9-1 -- LV2

Bug#722514: marked as done (RFS: fortunes-br/20130911 [ITA] -- fortune cookies in Portuguese)

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:26:51 + with message-id e1w8jdh-0005lb...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: fortunes-br/20130911 [ITA] -- fortune cookies in Portuguese has caused the Debian Bug report #722514, regarding RFS: fortunes-br/20130911 [ITA] -- fortune cookies

Bug#736671: marked as done (RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA])

2014-01-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:26:52 + with message-id e1w8jdi-0005ls...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #736671, regarding RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Re: question about the packaging helpers

2014-01-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote: My ultimate goal is to become the gnome maintainer of Tanglu. Why not join the Debian GNOME team? https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianGnome -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to