Hi Daniel,
I'm not sure if I have enough time to familiarise myself with the package to
sponsor it but I had a quick look so here is my feedback and improvement
ideas:
Although debian/copyright is almost comprehensive it still misses some
organisations, notably 2007 INRIA (AKA Dolphin?), 2006
Thanks Dmitry for the close review and the valuable hints for further
improvements. I'll get through it, luckily there is still some time
until the package really gets AUTORM.
Greetings,
Daniel
On 14.07.2014 08:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I'm not sure if I have enough time to
Hi,
I'm currently packaging GMastermind for Debian. In the process, it has
been discovered that, according to a technical reading of the README,
GMastermind is licensed under GPL-2 only (i.e. without or, at your
option, any later version).
However, according to the headers on the source files,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:06:16AM +, T o n g wrote:
dh_install(1) is a program, not a target.
install -m 755 ddclient \ $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/ddclient
install -D -m 755 debian/ddclient.NetworkManager \
$(DESTDIR)/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/50-ddclient
Writing proper
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:17:51AM +, T o n g wrote:
dh_install(1) is a program, not a target.
install -m 755 ddclient \ $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin/ddclient
install -D -m 755 debian/ddclient.NetworkManager \
$(DESTDIR)/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/50-ddclient
Writing proper
Well, it could be argued if this little notice in README carries more
legal weight than the intent expressed in the source files (the notice
does not follow the recommended form and gpl.txt is missing)...
We (pkg-gnustep) had an inititive 6 or 7 years ago to re-check the
licenses of all
Riley Baird wrote:
If you're worried about the incompatibility between LGPL3 and GPL2,
you don't have to be. gmastermind.app is only linking to the LGPL3
libraries, so the copyleft doesn't apply to it (because of the
linking exemption).
You are very wrong here. A GPLv2-only program cannot
On 14/07/14 19:45, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Riley Baird wrote:
If you're worried about the incompatibility between LGPL3 and GPL2,
you don't have to be. gmastermind.app is only linking to the LGPL3
libraries, so the copyleft doesn't apply to it (because of the
linking exemption).
You are very
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto. This upload
fixes an RC bug that upstream have fixed in a new release. I have also
uploaded a fix to mentors for the same bug to the current packaged
version (1.2.1), but would
Hei,
To build your own package, simply run debuild from inside the source
tree. dpkg-buildpackage(1) options may be given on the command line.
The typical command line options to build only the binary package(s)
without signing the .changes file (or the non-existent .dsc file):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/14/2014 12:56 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:31 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
I don't remember reading an explanation of how to do this in the
New Maintainers' Guide or similar documentation, and I don't see an
obvious way in
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:59 PM, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building?
As I'm still trying to learn Debian package building, I've found myself
fallen into this silly loop many times -- Thinking that the package would
be
Hi Luis!
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Luis Ángel San Martín Rodríguez
luisange...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone is interested in maintain the .deb package
for YACReader (www.yacreader.com). Right now, and thanks to a
contributor, the project has a beta package
Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
- should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
Both. for now.
Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
package? Debhelper does only have a qmake_qt4 buildsystem.
Or should I create a duplicate of
On 2014-07-14, Eric Maeker eric.mae...@gmail.com wrote:
Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
- should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
Both. for now.
Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
package? Debhelper does only have a
Hi,
On 14/07/14 15:07, Eric Maeker wrote:
Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
- should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
Both. for now.
Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
package? Debhelper does only have a qmake_qt4
Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends.
I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works
first.
If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/terminology
The respective dsc file can be
is somebody working on node-webkit packaging?
https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit
--
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 07/14/2014 08:26 PM, Fernando Toledo wrote:
is somebody working on node-webkit packaging?
https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit
Couldn't see it here:
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/prospective
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Asheesh,
thank you very much for your help.
You have probably missed the part where Felix said: I have no problem
building these packages and providing some support, but ideally this
position should be filled by someone actually running a .deb based linux
distribution (he uses Arch linux), so
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:27:40PM +0100, bofh80 wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends.
I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works
first.
If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know?
The new version
Hi Mentors,
I've updated the libquazip package so that it builds a dual qt version
of the library: Qt4 and Qt5. I still have to include the -dbg package
may be using override_dh_strip (it's in progress).
The source package builds without any error with a debian sid pbuilder
base (pbuilder
Hi Fernando,
AFAIK nobody in JavaScript Team is working on.
Consider to join us[0] if you want to package it.
Cheers!
Leo.
[0] - https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello List !
It seems that the SourceForge watch redirector for tth [1] does not update
properly:
since a couple of weeks the latest upstream version of tth at SourceForge [2]
has not been noticed.
In short I am stuck, but I want to step forward: any idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1]
Hi...
This bug is certainly starting to cause problems...
On 15 July 2014 01:35:46 BST, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Hello List !
It seems that the SourceForge watch redirector for tth [1] does not
update properly:
since a couple of weeks the latest upstream version of tth at
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
Only advice I can give you can find in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/07/msg00153.html
Negotiations with sourceforge are continuing but it looks like we may
have to adopt the RSS based redirector code.
--
bye,
pabs
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:02 +
with message-id e1x6uha-0006up...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: vmtouch/0.8-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #739484,
regarding RFS: vmtouch/0.8-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:04 +
with message-id e1x6uhc-0006xk...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: ngp/0.1-2.0 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #739178,
regarding RFS: ngp/0.1-2.0 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:02 +
with message-id e1x6uha-0006uj...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #740032,
regarding RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi
I'm working on gatejs which is a reverse forward proxy made using
javascript (nodejs).
It is under the GPLv3
We would like to port it for Debian. Is there someone to help me to do
that ?
https://github.com/binarysec/gate
https://github.com/binarysec/gateGhost
Thanks in advance
Michael
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Michael Vergoz wrote:
We would like to port it for Debian. Is there someone to help me to do that?
First read through Debian's guide for upstream projects and make any
changes needed:
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
Then read through our introduction to
31 matches
Mail list logo
