Bug#766583: RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.0-3

2014-10-24 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgeotiff-dfsg * Package name: libgeotiff-dfsg Version : 1.4.0-3 * URL : http://geotiff.osgeo.org/ Section : science It builds those binary

Re: Retry failied build

2014-10-24 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Ole, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org wrote: Hi, sometimes I experience that a failed build is retried automatically on a certain platform, especially (but not only) if the compilation looks really weird. Is there a way to trigger this? I have the case

Bug#766583: [ti...@debian.org: [libgeotiff-dfsg] 01/01: pristine-tar data for libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz]

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Johan, please always make sure to keep a pristine-tar branch in the repository. Thanks for your package preparation Andreas. - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org - Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:46:45 + From: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org To:

Bug#764381: marked as done (RFS: binwalk/2.0.1+dfsg-1 [RC])

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:37:11 -0700 with message-id caczd_tdvewxofmvcsga6v2m6fxzjpw4bnxbonfsl6csqf+h...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#764381: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1+dfsg-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #764381, regarding RFS: binwalk/2.0.1+dfsg-1 [RC] to be marked as

Bug#766583: [ti...@debian.org: [libgeotiff-dfsg] 01/01: pristine-tar data for libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz]

2014-10-24 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Yep, thought about it when I saw the mail on pkg-grass-devel passing by -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#765599: marked as done (RFS: libfm/1.2.3-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=t...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages has caused the Debian Bug report #765599, regarding RFS: libfm/1.2.3-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#765600: marked as done (RFS: pcmanfm/1.2.3-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=t...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages has caused the Debian Bug report #765600, regarding RFS: pcmanfm/1.2.3-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#766116: marked as done (RFS: lxlauncher/0.2.4-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=t...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages has caused the Debian Bug report #766116, regarding RFS: lxlauncher/0.2.4-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#766115: marked as done (RFS: lxinput/0.3.4-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=t...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages has caused the Debian Bug report #766115, regarding RFS: lxinput/0.3.4-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#766117: marked as done (RFS: lxtask/0.1.6-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tBYiUUBqL6S+AfAcP=AnZbeMJiQ59ck0QA=J2Eu_zk=t...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages has caused the Debian Bug report #766117, regarding RFS: lxtask/0.1.6-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#766508: Libjpeg trouble in jmapviewer

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I just uploaded jmapviewer. Unfortunately the problem with gdal-grass remains. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: Hi Felix, hello Andreas, unfortunately there is some conflict in the

Re: CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation ... System Error: Permission denied

2014-10-24 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Hi everybody! First, thank you for all your advices. Can you publish the source package? As Martin said, mysource package is available in Debian-Med [1] But configuring files directly to installation locations (like your /usr/bin) is a bad idea. This requires superuser powers at

Bug#766567: RFS: ruby-serverspec-runner/0.2.4-1 [ITP]

2014-10-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:18 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: serverspec is mainly used as a library (framework), not as an application, so ruby-serverspec is suitable package name for it. naming unification is not much important, i think. OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to

Bug#766567: RFS: ruby-serverspec-runner/0.2.4-1 [ITP]

2014-10-24 Thread dai
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:26:08PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to mentors.d.o. (with lintian fixes). http://mentors.debian.net/package/serverspec-runner http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serverspec-runner/serverspec-runner_0.2.4-1.dsc

Bug#762680: RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (refresh packaging)

2014-10-24 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:08:51PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package wmanager. This upload refreshes several aspects of the Debian packaging. * Package name: wmanager Version

getdns NMU

2014-10-24 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Stefan, Really? Preparing getdns NMU on mentors.debian.net without filling bug reports or even notifying a maintainer? Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation ... System Error: Permission denied

2014-10-24 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Hi Corentin! El 24/10/14 a les 11:05, Corentin Desfarges ha escrit: I removed lines in question and replaced them by : configure_file(${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/bin/qt.conf ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/qt.conf) (And CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR isn't /usr/bin this time). And it works ! I mean the

Re: getdns NMU

2014-10-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Ondřej, * Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org, 2014-10-24, 13:28: Really? Preparing getdns NMU on mentors.debian.net without filling bug reports or even notifying a maintainer? Please keep in mind than debian-mentors@ is supposed to be a friendly place to newcomers. mentors.debian.net is not a

Re: getdns NMU

2014-10-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote: But anyway, this workflow seems completely reasonable to me: 1) upload to mentors.d.n; 2) have someone review the changes; 3) have someone commit to upload the NMU; 4) file a bug (or post to existing bug) stating your intention to NMU. This is how I

Bug#766650: RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.0-4

2014-10-24 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgeotiff-dfsg Package name: libgeotiff-dfsg Version : 1.4.0-4 Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://geotiff.osgeo.org/ License

Bug#766660: RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1

2014-10-24 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package josm Package name: josm Version : 0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : JOSM Developers URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de License : GPL-3+ Section

Bug#765883: marked as done (RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 + with message-id e1xhhfa-0001wh...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #765883, regarding RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#766564: marked as done (RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP])

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 + with message-id e1xhhfa-0001wu...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #766564, regarding RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package josm-plugins Package name: josm-plugins Version : 0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 Upstream Author : JOSM Developers URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins License

Bug#766508: marked as done (RFS: jmapviewer/1.03+dfsg-2)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 + with message-id e1xhhfa-0001wg...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: jmapviewer/1.03+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #766508, regarding RFS: jmapviewer/1.03+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#766665: RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1

2014-10-24 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package openstreetmap-map-icons Package name: openstreetmap-map-icons Version : 1:0.0.svn30763-1 Upstream Author : Joerg Ostertag jo...@ostertag.name Guenther Meyer

Bug#766682: RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-4

2014-10-24 Thread Marius Gavrilescu
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: block 739709 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtk-theme-switch * Package name: gtk-theme-switch Version : 2.1.0-4 Upstream Author : Denis Briand de...@narcan.fr * URL :

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:36:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. --- libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build 2014-10-24 22:43:29.0 +0200 +++

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643. (closes: #764176) JOSM 7643 has hit the mirrors, so josm-plugins can be built now. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D

Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (=

Bug#765009: marked as done (RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA])

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:21:47 +0200 with message-id 1414189307.31439.1.ca...@debian.org and subject line RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #765009, regarding RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, thanks for the hint. Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates? Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:15:12AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Hi Andreas, On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643.

Bug#766662: RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]

2014-10-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/25/2014 12:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Bas, thanks for the hint. Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates? Unfortunately I don't, I just periodically check the version in latest the Packages file on the mirror. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1

Bug#766148: RFS: sleepenh/1.3.2 [ITA]

2014-10-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Owner: -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Nicolas, - you write in the changelog: * Set package source format to 3.0 (native); as agreed with original upstream author (Pedro), sleepenh is not a native Debian package That contradicts itself! And also you package version is one of a native

Bug#765009: Subject: RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA]

2014-10-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Many thanks James! Valid points Ross, please also consider those comments. Especially please fix the build system. I missed that during my review, sorry, but I will file a bug for that. (Also, please send your patches upstream.) -- tobi Am Montag, den 20.10.2014, 21:59 +0100 schrieb James

Bug#763512: RFS: bwctl/1.5.2+dfsg1-1

2014-10-24 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 12:49:04PM +0200, Raoul Borenius wrote: On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:29:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Please don't use .default to control whether the daemon should be started. I searched the Debian policy but found no information how this should be handled. I

Bug#766662: marked as done (RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC])

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 + with message-id e1xhstx-0001hz...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #72, regarding RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#766665: marked as done (RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 + with message-id e1xhstx-0001ht...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #75, regarding RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#766660: marked as done (RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1)

2014-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 + with message-id e1xhstx-0001hp...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #70, regarding RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the