Bug#772057: marked as done (RFS: libdvdnav/5.0.1-1~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jan 2015 02:37:46 -0800 with message-id CACZd_tCmhXd=m8g_bdan33un5_telzr8vutavnmodjhbuss...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: node-glob, a52dec, libdvdnav has caused the Debian Bug report #772057, regarding RFS: libdvdnav/5.0.1-1~bpo70+1 to be marked as done.

Bug#772058: marked as done (RFS: a52dec/0.7.4-17~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jan 2015 02:37:46 -0800 with message-id CACZd_tCmhXd=m8g_bdan33un5_telzr8vutavnmodjhbuss...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: node-glob, a52dec, libdvdnav has caused the Debian Bug report #772058, regarding RFS: a52dec/0.7.4-17~bpo70+1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#772090: marked as done (RFS: node-glob/4.0.5-1~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Jan 2015 02:37:46 -0800 with message-id CACZd_tCmhXd=m8g_bdan33un5_telzr8vutavnmodjhbuss...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: node-glob, a52dec, libdvdnav has caused the Debian Bug report #772090, regarding RFS: node-glob/4.0.5-1~bpo70+1 to be marked as done.

Bug#774413: RFS: libcmime/0.1.15-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcmime * Package name: libcmime Version : 0.1.15 Upstream Author : Axel Steiner, a...@treibsand.com Werner Detter, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de

Re: tuxonice-userui: can architecture be changed to linux-any ?

Le 01/02/15 05:02, Paul Wise a écrit : The TuxOnIce Linux kernel patch was removed from Debian after lenny, why is tuxonice-userui still in Debian? If tuxonice-userui doesn't work without a TuxOnIce-patched version of the Linux kernel, then tuxonice-userui should either be moved to contrib

Bug#774418: RFS: qmapshack/0.9.1-1~exp1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmapshack Package name: qmapshack Version : 0.9.1-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Oliver Eichler oliver.eich...@gmx.de URL :

Fwd: Sage/SIngular: static vs dynamic

Hello Forum, I am currently packaging Singular (the real target being Sage); I am finalizing. Note that I am not familiar with this particular CAS. I have just realised that the Singular CLI is built static (by default): I am very surprised because I expected a (regular) dynamic built. Does

Re: Sage/SIngular: static vs dynamic

I generally would say we should only provide static binaries when specifically requested or when that is required. If you do provide the static version, please set the Built-Using header correctly. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Robert, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.46-1

Bug#773611: Fwd: RFS: histring/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - general purpose highlighting tool

Dear mentors, I'd like to bring your attention again to my newly uploaded package histring (I'll keep reposting this request regularly in hoping it will catch someone's attention eventually). It was already *lintian clean*, and without any build problems when first uploaded (Ref

Bug#774418: marked as done (RFS: qmapshack/0.9.1-1~exp1)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:33:59 + with message-id e1y7gpx-00069g...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: qmapshack/0.9.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #774418, regarding RFS: qmapshack/0.9.1-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: tuxonice-userui: can architecture be changed to linux-any ?

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Julien Muchembled wrote: I guess this should even be fixed for Jessie. I think it is too late to fix that for jessie, removal is probably the appropriate action. Ouch. Ideally yes, but how to test hibernation ? By building a kernel with TOI-enabled, running it