Bug#804100: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.14.0-1~debian [ITP]

Hi Gianfranco, re: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.14.1-1 [ITP] sorry to re-ask this, any thoughts/changes etc that I need to do to progress this package? Cheers David

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

* Carl Suster , 2015-11-20, 13:46: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plowshare/plowshare_2.1.2-1.dsc This change is not documented in the changelog: -Description: Download and upload files from file sharing websites +Description: download and upload files from

Bug#804169: RFS: libjreen/1.2.0-1

Hi, I've updated libjreen. Now it uses the new jdns package. For finding it correctly, I had to patch the CMakeList.txt file. I also extend the package to build Qt5 based packages, too. I really do not know what's happened with the QA informations on http://mentors.debian.net/package/libjreen

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

Control: owner -1 ! * Carl Suster , 2015-11-20, 13:46: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plowshare/plowshare_2.1.2-1.dsc As promised in #801815, I'll have a look at it. -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plowshare" Package name: plowshare Version : 2.1.2-1 Section : web It builds those binary packages: plowshare - download and upload files from file sharing websites

Bug#805393: Subject: RFS: liblastfm/1.0.9-1 [ITA]

Hi, I've uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net > sure, I built for the last missing archs: > http://debomatic-powerpc.debian.net/distribution#unstable/liblastfm/1.0.9-1/buildlog > http://debomatic-s390x.debian.net/distribution#unstable/liblastfm/1.0.9-1/buildlog Thanks for building, but

Bug#805656: RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on this package. On 20-11-15 20:25, Ross Gammon wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-leaflet-hash" I pushed some changes to document the license & copyright for the embedded copy of leaflet-src.js, and update the Vcs-Browser URL to use HTTPS.

Re: Bug#805656: RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

On 11/20/2015 09:16 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Ross, > > Thanks for your work on this package. > > On 20-11-15 20:25, Ross Gammon wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-leaflet-hash" > > I pushed some changes to document the license & copyright for the > embedded

Bug#805656: RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-leaflet-hash" * Package name: node-leaflet-hash Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael Lawrence Evans * URL : https://github.com/mlevans/leaflet-hash *

Re: Bug#805656: RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

On 11/20/2015 09:30 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 11/20/2015 09:16 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: [...] >> I pushed some changes to document the license & copyright for the >> embedded copy of leaflet-src.js, and update the Vcs-Browser URL to use >> HTTPS. >> >> Why do you install

Bug#805656: marked as done (RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:07:04 +0100 with message-id <564fa798.8060...@xs4all.nl> and subject line RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP] [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #805656, regarding RFS: node-leaflet-hash/0.2.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Fixing "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright"

Hi, I need to fix "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing- license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright" for my package. Ref, https:// lintian.debian.org/maintainer/suntong...@users.sourceforge.net.html#dbab but I really don't know how to fix them. E.g., I found one example of fixing

Re: Fixing "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright"

T o n g writes: > I need to fix "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique" and "missing- > license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright" for my package. Ref, https:// > lintian.debian.org/maintainer/suntong...@users.sourceforge.net.html#dbab For reference, the current

Bug#805707: RFS: dbab/1.3.1-1 [new version update]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I updated my dbab (dbab: dnsmasq-based ad-blocker, which allows you to remove Ads and speed up your mobile device browsing without even installing any apps to them) to a newer version -- fixed two warnings and closed two bugs, and am

Bug#805632: RFS: plowshare/2.1.2-1

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Why is your .orig.tar different that the one uscan downloads? A good way to find out how it is different is to compare the two files using diffoscope. http://diffoscope.org/ Alternatively, debdiff from devscripts can compare source packages