Hi Fabian
>dh_auto_install does not do anything useful here: `make install` for
>some reason does not actually install anything but just compiles some
>examples (that won't be part of the Debian package) and then finishes
>with the note
>
>"No install provided, see comments in the README"
>
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 07:39:18 +
with message-id <20160518073917.gb20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#820383: RFS: photocollage/1.4.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #820383,
regarding RFS: photocollage/1.4.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi,
>I have set up a git repo on github:
>https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev
>My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC
(I won't clone that right now, only answering questions)
>Package builds fine with command: gbp buildpackage -us -uc --git-ignore-branch
you should also try
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 07:10:09 +
with message-id <20160518071007.ga20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824625: RFS: pentobi/12.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824625,
regarding RFS: pentobi/12.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi,
please can someone upload the package vsftpd?
The includes only this changes:
vsftpd (3.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Orphan this package.
* Set maintainer to Debian QA Group (See: #824694).
-- Jörg Frings-Fürst Wed, 18 May 2016 21:11:49
+0200
The
Hello Jörg,
In advance thank you for your work in this package.
>vsftpd (3.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Orphan this package.
> * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group (See: #824694).
You already reported an orphan bug. It's not necessary the upload.
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno
hi, sponsoring soon.
g.
Il Mercoledì 18 Maggio 2016 21:39, Jörg Frings-Fürst
ha scritto:
Hi,
please can someone upload the package vsftpd?
The includes only this changes:
vsftpd (3.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Orphan this package.
* Set maintainer to
Hi Lumin,
>Thank you James, I've solved this problem.
I don't want to do the final checks until Ghislain gives me his personal ack,
but
I see that the python3 dependencies might be fixed with not-much effort.
issues I would like to see fixed or answered:
python/requirements.txt <-- please check
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar"
* Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
Version : 0.17.1-1
Upstream Author : David Mohammed
* URL
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2016 01:27:37 +0200
with message-id <20160518232737.ga15...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#824714: RFS: testu01/1.2.3+ds-2 [Refreshment] -
testing suite for uniform random number generators
has caused the Debian Bug report #824714,
regarding RFS:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the Debian package testu01 [1], an
applied
mathematical suite for testing URNG. This very version is a refreshment
of
the Debian material.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1]
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2016 01:48:18 +0200
with message-id <20160518234818.ga17...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#824713: RFS:
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824713,
regarding RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.1-1
to be
Control: block -1 by 795841
Control: block 788539 by 795841
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 21:12 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Lumin,
>
> >Thank you James, I've solved this problem.
> I don't want to do the final checks until Ghislain gives me his personal ack,
> but
> I see that the python3
Control: block -1 by 799262
one more functional blocker, python3-opencv
opencv is (I guess) frequently used by caffe users, Debian
should have python3-opencv if we provide python3-caffe.
when is the EOL of python2.x? I forgot it.
If it is not 2017, can we first upload python2-caffe-* ?
I'll
Cheers for the review Mattia! I'll look into all of this. A few comments:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ...
> * d/patches/01_makefile_fixes.patch:
> + Probably use += instead of ?= in the first CFLAGS?
> + I'd rather use install(1) instead of
hi,
so the advice i received regarding the name was that i must get it
renamed upstream[1]. i don't think this will be possible because:
- upstream is an established package, present in PYPI and macports
- the developer is MIA
(additionally, the official Protocol Buffers 3 supports Python
* Jonathon Love , 2016-05-18, 18:45:
i'm in the process of packaging protobuf3:
https://github.com/Pr0Ger/protobuf3
this is an implementation of protocol buffers 2 for python 3.
according to debian policy, this should be named python3-protobuf3, but
i think this name isn't
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 16:55 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 17/05/16 15:42, lumin wrote:
> > Thank you for this careful and thorough review!
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/caffe.git/
Let me summarize the changes this time
* remove python script for autogen, generate
> On 18 May 2016, at 13:44, lumin wrote:
> * add debian/upstream/metadata , but lintian says
>
>> W: caffe source: upstream-metadata-yaml-invalid
>
> Is there anything wrong with this file? I have no idea
>
> ```
> Homepage: http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/
> Name: Caffe
> On 18 May 2016, at 14:15, James Clarke wrote:
>
>> On 18 May 2016, at 13:44, lumin wrote:
>> * add debian/upstream/metadata , but lintian says
>>
>>> W: caffe source: upstream-metadata-yaml-invalid
>>
>> Is there anything wrong with this file? I have
debomatic result
* build pass,
* autopkgtest OK, according to log no error occurs
* lintian remains 1 warning about that weird YAML issue
* piuparts fails because of DoM problem
updated package was uploaded to mentors
https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 07:53:09 +
with message-id <20160518075307.gc20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824622: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824622,
regarding RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.0.2-1
to be marked as
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:07:05PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
> thanks for the review, and sorry for the embarrassing "does not build"
> situation. i was packaging on ubuntu, and my experience has been that if it
> works there, it will work on debian - but apparently not, i'll be more
> careful
Hi Ben,
On 17 May 2016 at 21:06, Ben Finney wrote:
> How many process calls are there? The ideal solution IMO is to:
Not much of them. In my case, there's just one. I was thinking about a
corner case, where there would be multiple process calls, possible
making a
Tiago Ilieve writes:
> Thanks for your input. I like your suggestions, as they look pretty
> straightforward, but this is how this is being done for other
> packages?
Differently, depending on the state of upstream.
> I was looking at § 9.1.1 File System Structure[1]
On 15/05/16 17:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Given that nothing happened here in the last 6 months, I'm closing this
RFS ticket.
Feel free to open a new one if/when you'll come back.
I mean, Stefan is (at least in Debian) very much
Hi Gianfranco,
Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
> nice indeed, so please wait some more time, and ping me back in 7-15 days if
> nobody
> picked up the work in the meanwhile.
>
>
Iain R. Learmonth has uploaded gnustep-make.
Thanks to you for helping me to
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 11:11:02 + (UTC)
with message-id <1807413204.7088758.1463569862453.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep
build system
has caused the Debian Bug report #824262,
regarding RFS:
Hi all,
On 18/05/2016 11:48, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 18/05/2016 10:21, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
>> On 17 May 2016 at 21:06, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> How many process calls are there? The ideal solution IMO is to:
>> Not much of them. In my case, there's just one. I was
* Roger Shimizu , 2016-05-18, 02:14:
I'm doing ITP packaging on shadowsocks-libev. I have a few questions in
detail.
I have set up a git repo on github: https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev
My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC
Package builds fine with
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 08:04:55 +
with message-id <20160518080454.ge20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824619: RFS:
golang-github-hlandau-degoutils/0.0~git20160421.0.389a847-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824619,
regarding RFS:
hi,
i'm in the process of packaging protobuf3:
https://github.com/Pr0Ger/protobuf3
this is an implementation of protocol buffers 2 for python 3.
according to debian policy, this should be named python3-protobuf3, but
i think this name isn't ideal, because it could be mistaken for:
a) an
Hi,
>I know exactly what Mattia felt. :-(
git reflog is a good friend in this case :)
G.
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 08:00:32 +
with message-id <20160518080027.gd20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824621: RFS: golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1/1.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824621,
regarding RFS: golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1/1.0.3-1
to be marked as done.
umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar
branches. WHY? what did you do?
oh, sorry, i never intended for you to look at that repo, assuming you'd
look at the debian-mentors one.
And still it doesn't build, if that was meant to fix it.
Without thinking of it I
Jonathon,
On 18 May 2016 at 05:52, Jonathon Love wrote:
>> umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar
>> branches. WHY? what did you do?
>
> oh, sorry, i never intended for you to look at that repo, assuming you'd
> look at the debian-mentors one.
This
> Title: 'Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding'
Thank you James, I've solved this problem.
Mentors, please check the latest caffe package on mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe
debomatic result should be the same as that obtained 1 hour ago.
I think
* lumin , 2016-05-18, 12:44:
* add debian/upstream/metadata , but lintian says
W: caffe source: upstream-metadata-yaml-invalid
Is there anything wrong with this file? I have no idea
I've just commited fix for Lintian to include validation error in
the output, so in
Hi,
>If so, here's our alioth account: rosh-guest, hosiet-guest,
>madeye-guest.>Thank you!
you need to send a request to join collab-maint, an alioth account doesn't grant
your permissions automatically.
I suggest you to use an external repository to show your skills, and then ask
to join
[Add Max and Boyuan from upstream to CC]
Thanks Gianfranco and Jakub!
I comment when I still have question, for other parts I'll follow your
suggestion.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roger Shimizu , 2016-05-18, 02:14:
>>
>>
Hi, alternative proposal
>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly:
>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset
>- create debian/watch and ds repack
>- RFS shadowsocks-libev
>- apply for collab-maint access
- open ITP bugs for all the libraries (search for wnpp and ITP on google)
- package
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:59:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I don't see why it can't be patched to work like almost every other tool
> that uses a build system, but I don't care a lot about upstream.
>
> The (possible) issue I foresee is: somebody updates the upstream build system
>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>>If so, here's our alioth account: rosh-guest, hosiet-guest,
>>madeye-guest.>Thank you!
>
>
> you need to send a request to join collab-maint, an alioth account doesn't
> grant
> your
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:29:33PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >Done. I removed the override in debian/rules.
>
> wonderful
>
> >I went with a mixture of both patches you proposed. I also forwarded>the
> >patches to upstream & removed the now useless exports in
>
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 15:29:33 + (UTC)
with message-id <1909380391.7270110.1463585373317.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#824489: RFS: dwarfutils/20160507-1 [ITA] -- utility
and library to work with DWARF debug information
has caused the Debian Bug report
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-gopkg-hlandau-easyconfig.v1":
git clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-hlandau-easyconfig.v1.git
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1":
git clone
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1.git
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 17:44:58 +
with message-id <20160518174456.gg20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824687: RFS:
golang-gopkg-hlandau-easyconfig.v1/1.0.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824687,
regarding RFS: golang-gopkg-hlandau-easyconfig.v1/1.0.14-1
to
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2016 18:08:06 +
with message-id <20160518180805.gi20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#824688: RFS: golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1/1.2.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #824688,
regarding RFS: golang-gopkg-tylerb-graceful.v1/1.2.5-1
to be marked
49 matches
Mail list logo