Bug#874101: RFS: cutils/1.6-5 [QA-upload]

2017-09-03 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cutils" * Package name: cutils Version : 1.6-5 Upstream Author : Sandro Sigala * URL : http://www.sigala.it/sandro/software.php#cutils * License : B

Bug#874101: marked as done (RFS: cutils/1.6-5 [QA-upload])

2017-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:37:18 +0200 with message-id <20170903073718.6s4ujqhs7obei...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#874101: RFS: cutils/1.6-5 [QA-upload] has caused the Debian Bug report #874101, regarding RFS: cutils/1.6-5 [QA-upload] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#874107: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.3+ds.1-2

2017-09-03 Thread Tobias Winchen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" * Package name: engauge-digitizer Version : 10.3+ds.1-2 Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell * URL : https://github.com/markummitchell/engauge6 *

Bug#868488: RFS: sokochez/0.6.2-1 ITP

2017-09-03 Thread Baptiste Pouget
Thank you, I the package used to work before making the changes you suggested that's weird. It seems I forgot to test it after making the changes… I also have that issue on the current version. I don't know where it could come from. Well I will have a look at it maybe later… On 2017-09-03 03:50,

Bug#874107: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.3+ds.1-2)

2017-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:23:45 +0200 with message-id <20170903152345.mbn6s37rbacjt...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#874107: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.3+ds.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #874107, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.3+ds.1-2 to be marked as done. This means

no response from cont...@bugs.debian.org

2017-09-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I sent this (without the line wrap, and twice in case it got lost); nothing happened to the bug, and I didn't get an acknowledgement or error message back. What am I doing wrong? Forwarded Message Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 15:17:55 +0100 From: Rebecca N. Palmer To: Debian Bug Tr

Re: no response from cont...@bugs.debian.org

2017-09-03 Thread Geert Stappers
#we use 3.9 on release architectures block 87 by 873403 unblock 873331 by 873403 #this version FTBFS with llvm 4.0, upstream git doesn't tags 873403 + upstream fixed-upstream forwarded 873403 https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/beignet/2017-September/009153.html On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 04

Re: no response from cont...@bugs.debian.org

2017-09-03 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:56:25PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > We will see the effect in about a half hour. > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #we use 3.9 on release architectures > block 87 by 873403 Bug #87 [ftp.debian.org] RM: llvm-toolchain-3.9 -- ROM; Too man