Re: Problem with Git Push

Gianfranco, > this is a private repo > > please push there > git remote add upstream git+ssh:// > youru...@anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/cligh.git > > I just created a clone of that repo, and we will need a new unstable > upload with the new VCS fields in case. > I have this error:

Bug#849691: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell extension for listening to Internet radio streams)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:20:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell extension for listening to Internet radio streams has caused the Debian Bug report #849691, regarding RFS:

Bug#884740: RFS: pokemmo/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the Pokemon universe

Hi Tobias, > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Carlos, > > you saw the reject from the FTP masters already, I guess. > Please update d/copyright and then ping me again. > > Tobi I have made copyright changes in 'd/copyright' Please check mentors.d.n https://mentors.debian.net/package/pokemmo

Bug#864165: closed by Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> (Re: RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game)

Hi, > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #864165: RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily > install Stendhal game > > It has been closed by Tobias Frost . > >

Bug#849691: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell

Hi Tobias, I fixed the version and the changelog, I was not sure about it when I bumped it. I also fixed d/copyright. Thanks for the review. I uploaded a new version to mentors.d.n. but it's not showing for the moment, will wait and see. Maybe I did something wrong when I deleted the package

Bug#863108: closed by Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> (Re: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game)

Hi, > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily > install Minecraft game > > It has been closed by Tobias Frost . > >

Bug#884740: RFS: pokemmo/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the Pokemon universe

Hi Tobias, > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Carlos, > > you saw the reject from the FTP masters already, I guess. > Please update d/copyright and then ping me again. > > Tobi I have made copyright changes in 'd/copyright' Please check mentors.d.n https://mentors.debian.net/package/pokemmo

Bug#881295: RFS: rednotebook/2.3-1 [ITP] -- A cross-platform journal

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, (Please do NOT open up new RFS bugs but recycle the old ones. Thanks. The other RFS bugs are #875265 and #881279) Please note that I will not sponsor this package (as I'm not comfortable sponsoring python packages) Did you check the bugs from the old package? Are

Bug#881644: marked as done (RFS: codemirror-js/5.19.0-1)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 11:32:09 +0100 with message-id <1515061929.28070.7.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: codemirror-js/5.19.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #881644, regarding RFS: codemirror-js/5.19.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#869198: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:20:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #869198, regarding RFS:

Re: Problem with Git Push

Gianfranco, Are there some chance that the repo of cligh is in Salsa? El jue., 4 de ene. de 2018 a la(s) 11:01, eamanu15 . < emmanuelaria...@gmail.com> escribió: > please push there >> git remote add upstream git+ssh:// >> youru...@anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/cligh.git >> >> I just

Bug#883702: 2018-01-02 12:05 reviewed

FWIW there is an upload to mentors.d.n. at 2018-01-02 12:05 uscan is able to see a new version, but downloads HTML, not a .orig.tar.?z Geert and Albert are emailing in their native language. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

Bug#877296: marked as done (RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 16:48:29 +0100 with message-id <1515080909.20172.27.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#877296: Subject: RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #877296, regarding RFS: dokuwiki-sync/0.1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Problem with Git Push

Hello, >Are there some chance that the repo of cligh is in Salsa? I don't see any collab-maint on salsa, and I prefer to wait some more days before migrating to it... anyhow, created by importing from collab-maint https link https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cligh have fun! G. El jue., 4 de

Bug#876043: RFS: plibsys/0.0.3~git20170912.7069e03 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, (Sorry, I do not intend to sponsor this package) I'm also unsure if the libary is of much use in Debian. (Maybe you can expand why it would make sense to have it in Debian. Are there reverse dependencies, where would it be used?) Here's a review: - As you are

Re: Problem with Git Push

On 01/04/2018 05:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I don't see any collab-maint on salsa > From salsa announcement: "Collab-maint If you want to allow other Debian Developers to work on your packages or software, you can create projects within the **Debian** group. Every

Bug#869806: Update

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Julien, another review: - d/changelog: Initial packaging has only one changelog entry, closing the ITP bug. Delete the others. - your tiny library... Please either package it as a real library package. You say in the linitian override that this lib is probably not

Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi, bug-triaging on sponsorship-requests brought me to your package, so here's a review: - In the meantime version 0.5 has been released. Would be great if you could update the pakage to the latest version, (I will sponsor it then) - please bump

Bug#880991: chapel-1.16/1.16.0-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo I can confirm the FTBFS in a pbuilder enviorment. Please fix and remove the "moreinfo" tag one you're ready for the next round of review. Thanks.

Bug#884740: RFS: pokemmo/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the Pokemon universe

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Carlos, you saw the reject from the FTP masters already, I guess. Please update d/copyright and then ping me again. Tobi

Bug#883628: ITP: ioport -- direct access to I/O ports from the command line

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, here's a review: - d/changelog is for UNRELEASED. (- you should also update the timestamp) - d/compat can be bumped to 11 (you B-D on debhelper >11 already) - Optional: Please add a VCS for the packageing. For example you can use salsa.debian.org to host it. - Did

Re: Problem with Git Push to git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/user

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:55:05AM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am new on debian and I adopt my first package (cligh). > > So, first I upload the new version of the package to mentors.debian (me > like maintainer) and then was uploaded to the official repository. > > Now, in

Bug#874305: RFS: mitlm/0.4.2-1 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit

Control: tags -1 moreinfo I can confirm the FTBFS in a pbuilder enviroment. Other notes: (Note that I did NOT a complete review) - Are you sure you want it uploaded to experimental? Why? - d/compat could be bumped. - (S-V has increased in the meantime too, when over it you might want to update

Re: Problem with Git Push to git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/user

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:55:05AM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > >... > > > > *git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/cligh.git* > > After clone, I add the new changes and I try to make a push origin but I > > have

Bug#881032: RFS: icecc/1.1-2~bpo9+1 NMU

Control: tags -1 wontfix Hi Pablo, mmm, a backports upload is quite special.. looking for your name in the usual Debian locations, (DDPO, minechangelogs, contributors.d.o) I cannot find previous contributions with your name on it, so I cannot recommend that you do a backports upload as your

Problem with Git Push

Dear mentors, I am new on debian and I adopt my first package (cligh). So, first I upload the new version of the package to mentors.debian (me like maintainer) and then was uploaded to the official repository. Now, in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cligh there is an action need that is *The VCS

Bug#885641: RFS: xml-core/0.18-1 [ITA]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo > I will look at the steps described above and the issue. I will rework on the > package based on the steps described above, thanks. > Cool! Please remove the moreinfo tag once ready! -- tobi

Bug#884740: RFS: pokemmo/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the Pokemon universe

Uploaded! As this needs to pass NEW, please remove the package manually from mentors. Thanks for your contribution! -- tobi

Re: Problem with Git Push to git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/user

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:43:31PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:55:05AM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > > >... > > > > > > *git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/cligh.git* > > > After

Re: Problem with Git Push

Hello, >Afterclone, I add the new changes and I try to make a push origin but I have >this error:The requested URL returned error: 403. this is a private repo please push there git remote add upstream git+ssh://youru...@anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/cligh.git I just created a clone

Re: Problem with Git Push

On Thu, 04 Jan 2018, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > >Afterclone, I add the new changes and I try to make a push origin but I have > >this error:The requested URL returned error: 403. > > > this is a private repo > > please push there > git remote add upstream >

Re: Problem with Git Push

> > please push there > git remote add upstream git+ssh:// > youru...@anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/cligh.git > > I just created a clone of that repo, and we will need a new unstable > upload with the new VCS fields in case. > > Ok, Thanks!. I will make this tonight Regards! Emmanuel --

Re: Problem with Git Push to git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/user

This is what I have in ~/src/pkg-package/.git/config among others lines > >[remote "origin"] > url = https://anonscm.debian.org/git/team/pkg-package.git > fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >[remote "alioth"] > url =

Bug#849691: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-radio/8-1 [ITP] -- GNOME shell

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi Léo, here's a review: - d/changelog for initial packaging has *always* only the entry closing the ITP package. - that also means that you must have the Debian version at -1 for the initial upload. IOW, just keep the entry from Dec 7 (update the

Bug#885395: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-1)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:59:07 +0100 with message-id <1515059947.21525.0.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885395, regarding RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#881946: RFS: keychain/2.8.4+dfsg-1 [ITA]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo There is a new upload on mentors, but did not check was has been changed. -- tobi

Bug#863108: marked as done (RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:40:01 +0100 with message-id <1515076801.20172.11.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game has caused the Debian Bug report #864169, regarding RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1

Bug#864169: marked as done (RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:40:01 +0100 with message-id <1515076801.20172.11.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game has caused the Debian Bug report #864169, regarding RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1

Bug#870324: marked as done (RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:38:14 +0100 with message-id <1515076694.20172.10.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game has caused the Debian Bug report #870324, regarding RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] --

Bug#862859: marked as done (RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:40:01 +0100 with message-id <1515076801.20172.11.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game has caused the Debian Bug report #864169, regarding RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1

Bug#863094: marked as done (RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:38:14 +0100 with message-id <1515076694.20172.10.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game has caused the Debian Bug report #870324, regarding RFS: stendhal-installer/0.1-2 [ITP] --

Re: Problem with Git Push to git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/user

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:15:25PM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > Geert Stappers: > } Think "website" all can read, few are allowed to write. > }the readers are anonym, the writers have identified them self. > > > > This is what I have in ~/src/pkg-package/.git/config among others lines > > >

Bug#868488: RFS: sokochez/0.6.2-1 ITP

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 16:11:00 +0200 Baptiste Pouget wrote: > Thank you, I the package used to work before making the changes you > suggested that's weird. > It seems I forgot to test it after making the changes… > I also have that issue on the current