Bug#886583: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-2)

2018-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:51:08 +0200
with message-id <4d38d725-c0ea-b34c-b7e2-79741c9f6...@linux.com>
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #886583,
regarding RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
886583: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-hide"

 * Package name: nautilus-hide
   Version : 0.2.3-2
   Upstream Author : Bruno Nova 
 * URL : https://github.com/brunonova/nautilus-hide
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : gnome

  It builds this binary package:

nautilus-hide - Extension for Nautilus to hide files without renaming them

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/nautilus-hide


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nautilus-hide/nautilus-hide_0.2.3-2.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Relocate VCS to salsa.debian.org.
  * Build with Debhelper compatibility level 11.
  * Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.3.
  * debian/gbp.conf: formatting changes.
  * Update debian/watch to allow all available versions of upstream
tarballs to be downloaded, not just the most recent ones.


  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---

Bug#886582: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.2-2)

2018-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:50:39 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #886582,
regarding RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
886582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-admin"

 * Package name: nautilus-admin
   Version : 1.1.2-2
   Upstream Author : Bruno Nova 
 * URL : https://github.com/brunonova/nautilus-admin
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : gnome

  It builds this binary package:

nautilus-admin - Extension for Nautilus to do administrative operations

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/nautilus-admin


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nautilus-admin/nautilus-admin_1.1.2-2.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Relocate VCS to salsa.debian.org.
  * Build with Debhelper compatibility level 11.
  * Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.3.
  * debian/gbp.conf: formatting changes.
  * Update debian/watch to allow all available versions of upstream
tarballs to be downloaded, not just the most recent ones.


  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---

Bug#886606: RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.5-1 [ITP] -- Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator

2018-01-08 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes 
Hi Tobias, 

I hope I succeeded this time. :)

> You should have recycled that RFS bug, same for the ITP.. (by e.g retitleing)
> But, ok, we can work with the new ones.. I've merged the ITP bugs already

Bug#886659: marked as done (RFS: openbox/3.6.1-6 [RC])

2018-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2018 00:27:24 +0100
with message-id <20180108232723.txngpx25c3txy...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#886659: RFS: openbox/3.6.1-6 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #886659,
regarding RFS: openbox/3.6.1-6 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
886659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openbox"

 * Package name: openbox
   Version : 3.6.1-6
   Upstream Author : 2003-2011, Dana Jansens 
 * URL : openbox.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : x11

  It builds those binary packages:

gnome-panel-control - command line utility to invoke GNOME panel 
run dialog/menu

 libobrender32v5 - rendering library for openbox themes
 libobt2v5  - parsing library for openbox
 openbox- standards-compliant, fast, light-weight and extensible 
window man

 openbox-dev - development files for the openbox window manager
 openbox-gnome-session - command line utility to run Openbox as GNOME 
session
 openbox-kde-session - command line utility to run Openbox as KDE SC 
session


  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/openbox


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openbox/openbox_3.6.1-6.dsc


  More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://www.example.com.


  Changes since the last upload:

* debian/control:
+ Move openbox-menu to Recommends. (Closes: #872983)
+ Bump dh version to 11.
+ Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3.
  * Drop depends on gconf2: (Closes: #886050 LP: #1740420)
+ Add debian/patches/09-disable-check-gnome-version.patch.
  * Add python script to generate menu as replacent for openbox-menu


  Regards,
   Mateusz Łukasik
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:10:05PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
>  * Package name: openbox
>Version : 3.6.1-6

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
> * debian/control:
> + Move openbox-menu to Recommends. (Closes: #872983)
> + Bump dh version to 11.
> + Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3.
>   * Drop depends on gconf2: (Closes: #886050 LP: #1740420)
> + Add debian/patches/09-disable-check-gnome-version.patch.
>   * Add python script to generate menu as replacent for openbox-menu

Didn't actually test obamenu, but packaging changes look fine.
Uploaded.


Meow!
-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---

Bug#886606: RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.5-1 [ITP] -- Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator

2018-01-08 Thread Tobias Frost 
Hi Carlos,

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:50:55AM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
>   Dear mentors,
> 
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokemmo-installer"
> 
>  * Package name: pokemmo-installer
>Version : 1.4.5-1
>Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes 
>  * URL : https://github.com/coringao/pokemmo-installer
>  * License : GPL-3+
>Section : games
> 
>   It builds those binary packages:
> 
>   pokemmo-installer - Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator
> 
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the 
> following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/pokemmo-installer
> 
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
>   dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pokemmo-installer/pokemmo-installer_1.4.5-1.dsc
> 
>   This package is from the previous version of "pokemmo/1.4.3-1", follows the 
> Debian Bug report logs.
> 
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884740

You should have recycled that RFS bug, same for the ITP.. (by e.g retitleing)
But, ok, we can work with the new ones.. I've merged the ITP bugs already.

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   **changelog version: 1.4.5**
>* Updated desktop file
>* Updated the readme description
>* Changed program name for 'PokeMMO Installer'
>* Rename the binary package to 'pokemmo-installer'
>* Updated executable script main
>* Rename the manpage to 'pokemmo-installer.6'
>* Updated the description of the manpage

There are more changes than this... However, 
- we need to target contrib. It is not ok to go for main, so please change that 
back.
- the long description: I think something like the last sentence from my
  propsoal would help to transport the message that this package is not
  PokeMMO, but I'm not 100% happy with it myself, so I somehow
  understand that you did not embed it. But I think we need something
  to underline that the real thing is some other property.

Maybe: 
"PokeMMO is a product from PokeMMO.eu, please see their
website for details and further information."

- another question: The pokemmo.png .. Can you elaborate about the
  source of the image? The license could be troublesome...

--
tobi

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-2 [ITP]

2018-01-08 Thread kkremitzki 
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:30 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Kurt Kremitzki,
> 
> many thanks for the package!
> 
> As the package is huge, I think review will take some time and
> probably
> some iterations. I will start on the review, but I hope that others
> will chime in. (I will not have enough time for a complete review
> today)
> 

Indeed this is a huge package, so thanks for taking the time to review
my work. 

> - d/README.Debian.html
> I'm not sure if we want a html file as README.debian. It seems also
> quite outdates (referring to version 6.5). Its content is also
> covered
> by other parts of the pacakging (e.g by d/control), so I guess it
> should be deleted
> - d/README.source
> Same here, quilt is standard nowardays, so it can be retired.
> I'm not sure about the repacking part, but if that is still true,
> the package version would needs to be a -dfsg anyway.

Yes, these were artifacts from version 6.5.0 and were meant to be
deleted.  I've fixed that.

> - d/changelog
> Please keep at Debian revision -1 until this is sponsored.
> But as this is a reintroduction of an old package, you will
> still need to record all the changes you have made to the old
> packaging.
> (There is also extra blank lines below your entries)

Thanks, I wasn't sure how to upload changes so I was bumping the Debian
revision number. I got help in #debian-mentors and corrected this.

> - d/compat: Did you see if you can use compat level 11?

Corrected as well.

> - please add dep3 headers to the patches.

I've added these, hopefully they look OK.

> 
> - d/control
>   - VCS-* are for the Debian packaging, not for the upstream
> repository.
>   - Would be great if you could maintain the package on a git repo;
> you
> can use salsa.debian.org for it.

Ah, I wasn't sure on this point.  I've uploaded the source to https://s
alsa.debian.org/kkremitzki-guest/opencascade and updated the VCS-*
stuff to point there.  Does that look alright?  I got started reading
the documentation for git-buildpackage but hopefully a full transition
to getting this package based on salsa.d.o instead of an upstream
tarball can be done as an improvement after getting the package into
Debian.

> 
> 
> Sofar...
> I try to dedicate some more time later...
> 
> 
> 

Thanks again!  The updated package is uploaded now at https://mentors.d
ebian.net/package/opencascade.

Bug#886659: RFS: openbox/3.6.1-6 [RC]

2018-01-08 Thread Mateusz Łukasik 

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openbox"

 * Package name: openbox
   Version : 3.6.1-6
   Upstream Author : 2003-2011, Dana Jansens 
 * URL : openbox.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : x11

  It builds those binary packages:

gnome-panel-control - command line utility to invoke GNOME panel 
run dialog/menu

 libobrender32v5 - rendering library for openbox themes
 libobt2v5  - parsing library for openbox
 openbox- standards-compliant, fast, light-weight and extensible 
window man

 openbox-dev - development files for the openbox window manager
 openbox-gnome-session - command line utility to run Openbox as GNOME 
session
 openbox-kde-session - command line utility to run Openbox as KDE SC 
session


  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/openbox


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openbox/openbox_3.6.1-6.dsc


  More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://www.example.com.


  Changes since the last upload:

* debian/control:
+ Move openbox-menu to Recommends. (Closes: #872983)
+ Bump dh version to 11.
+ Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3.
  * Drop depends on gconf2: (Closes: #886050 LP: #1740420)
+ Add debian/patches/09-disable-check-gnome-version.patch.
  * Add python script to generate menu as replacent for openbox-menu


  Regards,
   Mateusz Łukasik

Bug#866123: marked as done (RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2018-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:20:19 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #866123,
regarding RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
866123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fbkeyboard"

* Package name: fbkeyboard
  Version : 0.1-1
  Upstream Author : Julian Winkler
* URL :https://github.com/julianwi/fbkeyboard
* License : GPL
  Section : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  fbkeyboard - simple on screen keyboard for fbdev

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/fbkeyboard


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget 
-xhttps://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fbkeyboard/fbkeyboard_0.1-1.dsc

If you want to test it but you don't have a touchscreen device with working 
linux text console,
it can also be tested on a laptop with touchpad.

Regards,
 Julian Winkler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package fbkeyboard has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---