Bug#919637: RFS: elinks/0.13~20190114-1 [ITA]

2019-01-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 07:42:08AM +0100, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > I am adopting elinks. Awesome! > Anyways, this upload is targetting experimental, as I have enabled > several features like Bittorrent and Javascript. I'm not entirely sure if enabling javascript is such a hot idea in a

Bug#915758: marked as done (RFS: kytos-sphinx-theme/0.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP])

2019-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:27:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: kytos-sphinx-theme/0.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #915758, regarding RFS: kytos-sphinx-theme/0.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#919701: RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3

2019-01-18 Thread Jose G. López
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid" * Package name: scid Version : 1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL-2.0 Section :

Bug#896072: marked as done (RFS: cplay/1.50-3 [ITA])

2019-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:03:10 + with message-id <20190119070310.lyxi2q34eefgx...@master.debian.org> and subject line rfs without package has caused the Debian Bug report #896072, regarding RFS: cplay/1.50-3 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#896073: marked as done (RFS: cplay/1.50-3 [ITA])

2019-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:03:10 + with message-id <20190119070310.lyxi2q34eefgx...@master.debian.org> and subject line rfs without package has caused the Debian Bug report #896072, regarding RFS: cplay/1.50-3 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#919743: RFS: rumur/2019.01.12-1 [ITP]

2019-01-18 Thread Matthew Fernandez
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur" * Package name: rumur Version : 2019.01.12-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Fernandez * URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur * License : The Unlicense

Bug#919745: RFS: ffcvt-1.3.1

2019-01-18 Thread Tong Sun
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of "ffcvt". The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/ffcvt It is a handy

Bug#919744: RFS: golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser

2019-01-18 Thread Tong Sun
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of "golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser". The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at:

Bug#919637: RFS: elinks/0.13~20190114-1 [ITA]

2019-01-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:51 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > I'm not entirely sure if enabling javascript is such a hot idea in a > codebase that hardly sees maintenance these days. But it's up to you... Personally I think the users of terminal-based web browsers would be very surprised and possibly

Bug#919701: marked as done (RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3)

2019-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2019 01:44:48 +0100 with message-id <20190119004448.yyuc7ztmomavl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#919701: RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #919701, regarding RFS: scid/1:4.6.4+dfsg1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#919637: RFS: elinks/0.13~20190114-1 [ITA]

2019-01-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 07:47:51AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:51 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > > > I'm not entirely sure if enabling javascript is such a hot idea in a > > codebase that hardly sees maintenance these days. But it's up to you... > > Personally I think the

Bug#919614: marked as done (RFS: note/1.3.26-2 [ITA])

2019-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:20:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: note/1.3.26-2 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #919614, regarding RFS: note/1.3.26-2 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Best practice to copy(reuse) a shared object and assign it with another SONAME?

2019-01-18 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi mentors, I'm wondering if there is any shared object trick that allows me to create some "stub" shared object that reuses all symbols from another shared object, but has different SONAME compared to the original one. Background: * We have a shared object named libopenblas.so.0, with

Bug#919645: RFS: monit/1:5.25.2-2~bpo9+1 [BPO]

2019-01-18 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal I (current maintainer of the package) am looking for (6 or 7-th time?) a sponsor for my backport of the package monit. Package can be downloaded from m.d.n: https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit