Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:35:10AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > ... > dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot not found, either install the fakeroot > package, specify a command with the -r option, or run this as root > I: copying local configuration > E: Failed autobuilding of package > ... Are you

Re: Symbols files for C++ libraries

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Alf Gaida wrote: > Am 06.12.2019 um 17:37 schrieb Ole Streicher: > > How should one handle this? > > > > Best regards > > > > Ole > > > Arch dependend symbols are a pain in the ... :D However, it can be helpful to detect ABI changes that are not

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:38:59AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Are you explicitly specifying -rfakereoot in your dpkg-buildpackage > options? Ahhh, I was actually missing this in my gbp-pbuilder script. Thanks for the hint, Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Uh, sorry for being imprecise. I meant, that you *should not* set that option, and let dpkg decide by itself. On Mon, 9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm Andreas Tille, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:38:59AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > > Are you explicitly specifying -rfakereoot in your

Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, if I try to use my usual pbuilder setup with a package that is specifying Rules-Requires-Root: no in d/control this ends up with ... dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot not found, either install the fakeroot package, specify a command with the -r option, or run this as root I: copying

Bug#944815: marked as done (RFS: ledmon/0.93-2 -- Enclosure LED Utilities)

2019-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:26:42 +0100 with message-id <20191209112642.ga14...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#944815: RFS: ledmon/0.93-2 -- Enclosure LED Utilities has caused the Debian Bug report #944815, regarding RFS: ledmon/0.93-2 -- Enclosure LED Utilities to be marked as

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Uh, sorry for being imprecise. I meant, that you *should not* set that > option, and let dpkg decide by itself. OK, In my case dpkg has no choice to decide since the pbuilder chroot is just lacking fakeroot. I get ... I:

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:56:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Uh, sorry for being imprecise. I meant, that you *should not* set that > > option, and let dpkg decide by itself. > > OK, In my case dpkg has no choice to decide

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 07:27:12PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > OK, In my case dpkg has no choice to decide since the pbuilder > > chroot is just lacking fakeroot. I get > > Which is perfectly fine. So far I agree. > I now tried and indeed there is no trace of fakeroot usage, as it

Re: Any clue how to use pbuilder / cowbuilder in connection with Rules-Requires-Root: no

2019-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:11:34PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I'm honestly a bit at loss on how to further debug this issue at this > > time. > > Which at least is relaxing that I'm not asking a stupif FAQ here. :/ Could you please try to provide a full log, with --debug? As an attachment