Re: package one package from a git repo with multiple packages

2020-03-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:02:03PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote: > > how did you > > resolve the NTK-fork dep and the waf evil? > > About he Waf evil, upstream developer told me this: > > "There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the > shipped WAF binary is. I think

Re: package one package from a git repo with multiple packages

2020-03-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:35:17PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote: > > > If you just want to package non-session-manager, why not: > > > 1. Download the tarball from here: > > > https://git.tuxfamily.org/non/non.git/tag/?id=non-session-manager-v1.2.0 > > > (or the github mirror - whichever is

Re: package one package from a git repo with multiple packages

2020-03-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:11:04PM -0600, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > src:non (or src:non-daw) would generate > bin:non-{timeline,sequencer,mixer,session-manager}. Andrey, is the > simplest method still debian/bin-pkg-name0.install and > debian/bin-pkg-name1.install + simple glob patterns, and/or

Re: Access to repositories

2020-03-10 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
On 10.03.2020 00:39, Adam Borowski wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:11:19PM +0100, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: On 09.03.2020 18:35, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 04:46:34PM +0100, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: I have updated a couple of packages and hope that someone can give

Bug#953547: RFS: libusb3380/0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 [ITP] -- USB3380 abstraction layer for libusb: development

2020-03-10 Thread Sepi Gair
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors and HAM Radio Team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libusb3380" which is another part of XTRX SDR support. * Package name: libusb3380 Version : 0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 Upstream Author : Sergey

Re: Understanding "pending uploads"

2020-03-10 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi Sepi, On 10/03/2020 18:17, Sepi Gair wrote: > Sorry, I thought this is a common name for the specific state of > upload. > > There is the source package liblms7compact listed on my QA page[1]. It > placed in the section named "Pending uploads". > > 1.

Bug#953564: RFS: pygresql/1:5.1.1-1 [QA] -- PostgreSQL module for Python3

2020-03-10 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygresql" * Package name: pygresql Version : 1:5.1.1-1 Upstream Author : PyGreSQL team * URL : https://www.pygresql.org/index.html * License :

Understanding "pending uploads"

2020-03-10 Thread Sepi Gair
Hello, I've got a sponsor for my package, the package now is pending for upload. Could you please describe what does this exactly mean? Is there any ETA or something? Should I wait for this package would be uploaded until RFS for sponsorship for the next package which depends on this one? All my

Bug#953547: RFS: libusb3380/0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 [ITP] -- USB3380 abstraction layer for libusb: development

2020-03-10 Thread Christoph Berg
Hi Sepi, there's a missing copyright attribution: ./cmake_modules/Findlibusb-1.0.cmake: # Adapted from cmake-modules Google Code project # # Copyright (c) 2006 Andreas Schneider # # (Changes for libusb) Copyright (c) 2008 Kyle Machulis # # Redistribution and use is allowed according to the

Re: Understanding "pending uploads"

2020-03-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:57:15PM +0100, Sepi Gair wrote: > Hello, > > I've got a sponsor for my package, the package now is pending for > upload. What do you mean? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Understanding "pending uploads"

2020-03-10 Thread Sepi Gair
Sorry, I thought this is a common name for the specific state of upload. There is the source package liblms7compact listed on my QA page[1]. It placed in the section named "Pending uploads". 1. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sepigair%40email.cz On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 21:59 +0500,

Bug#953547: marked as done (RFS: libusb3380/0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 [ITP] -- USB3380 abstraction layer for libusb: development)

2020-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:45:07 +0100 with message-id <20200310214507.ge1068...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#953547: RFS: libusb3380/0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 [ITP] -- USB3380 abstraction layer for libusb: development has caused the Debian Bug report #953547, regarding

Bug#953547: RFS: libusb3380/0.0.1+git20190125.c83d1e9-1 [ITP] -- USB3380 abstraction layer for libusb: development

2020-03-10 Thread Sepi Gair
Hello, Christoph, I fixed both issues. On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:44 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Hi Sepi, > > there's a missing copyright attribution: > > ./cmake_modules/Findlibusb-1.0.cmake: > # Adapted from cmake-modules Google Code project > # > # Copyright (c) 2006 Andreas Schneider >