Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freespeech":
* Package name : freespeech
Version : 1.0m-21
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/freespeech
* License
Hi Balint,
I've uploaded 0.4.0-2 with the suggested fixes.
reply inlined below:
On 09/11/2023 16:23, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Colin,
Colin King (gmail) ezt írta (időpont: 2023.
nov. 7., K, 15:18):
Hi Balint,
Thanks for responding with the review. I was waiting for the upstream
project to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rulex":
* Package name : rulex
Version : 3.8.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multispeech":
* Package name : multispeech
Version : 4.6.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/multispeech
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ru-tts":
* Package name : ru-tts
Version : 6.2.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
* License :
Dear mentors,
I turn to you with this question: is there any procedure to persuade an
individual to sign a key he promised to sign during a key-signing
meeting? I refrain from mentioning specific names here, but here is what
happened:
On October 7, I met a Debian developer in Tilburg, NL in
On 2023-11-14 19:11 +0100, Maarten van Geijn wrote:
> I turn to you with this question: is there any procedure to persuade an
> individual to sign a key he promised to sign during a key-signing meeting?
No. It is always entirely up to them.
[key was not signed]
> Does this happen more often?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 07:45:36AM +, Krämer, Jan wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I still have some questions:
>
> - Is it permitted to update the libsilkit version (to 4.0.39) within the
> review process?
Yes, you can update to a later version.
(if you do so, just upload it to mentors.d.n and
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2023 18:03:04 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055912: RFS: python-scienceplots/2.1.0-3 --
Matplotlib styles for scientific figures
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055912,
regarding RFS: python-scienceplots/2.1.0-3 -- Matplotlib styles for
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2023 18:04:02 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055911: RFS: python-art/6.1-3 -- ASCII art
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055911,
regarding RFS: python-art/6.1-3 -- ASCII art
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 07:11:56PM +0100, Maarten van Geijn wrote:
> Of course it could be anything, but I am starting to feel hoodwinked. Does
> this happen more often? Any recommendation from you?
In big signing parties its pretty usual that a sizeable chunk never
signs your key, I suppose
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 07:11:56PM +0100, Maarten van Geijn wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I turn to you with this question: is there any procedure to persuade an
> individual to sign a key he promised to sign during a key-signing meeting? I
> refrain from mentioning specific names here, but here is
Thank you all for your replies. That is a good sign and I will just take
this as an experience to get better and move on.
Regards
Maarten
On 14/11/2023 19:11, Maarten van Geijn wrote:
Dear mentors,
I turn to you with this question: is there any procedure to persuade an
individual to sign a
13 matches
Mail list logo
