On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:28 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
- latest Standards-Version is 3.6.1.0,
Fixed
- you should define man 'SECTION' to 1 in debian/gnome-ppp.sgml,
Fixed
- you may ask upstream for some strange warnings while compiling like:
gnome-ppp-wvdialconf.c: In function
I made a package for gnome-ppp to fix #251472, and now looking for
someone who will upload the package in Debian. It's available on http://
mentors.debian.net, package name is gnome-ppp. Thanks.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like
On Monday 28 June 2004 05:43, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
The package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
Not
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
net. I hope it works.
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
!doctype refentry PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN [
!--
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
Build-Depends even.
/usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
build-essential. XML::Parser does
Hi
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot
of documentation!
i can't share the installation scripts
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
your debian/copyright file accordingly.
Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of the
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL
Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
The package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.
Any other flaws? ;)
--
Dan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.
Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Linda:
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
Hi
Hello.
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon. Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.
- Matt
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
I would like to
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one
Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir
On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave
* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the
On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 18:41 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
This manual page documents briefly the
gnome-ppp command.
Superfluous.
Removed.
This manual page was written for the Debian
distribution because the original program
does not have a manual
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next
Greetings,
i am still looking a sponsor for package yaffa.
Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
Package name : yaffa
Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors : Anton Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net
Licence: GNU
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
answer yet.
Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)
We are currently investigating. But our disks
Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
It is...
K.
--
Lucas Wall [EMAIL
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
W: gnome-ppp: manpage-section-mismatch usr/share/man/man1/gnome-ppp.1.gz:54 1 !=
SECTION
Fixed
There is no closes: #251472 in your debian/changelog file to close the
ITP.
Fixed
BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has
I made a package for gnome-ppp to fix #251472, and now looking for
someone who will upload the package in Debian. It's available on http://
mentors.debian.net, package name is gnome-ppp. Thanks.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
net. I hope it works.
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
!doctype refentry PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN [
!--
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
Build-Depends even.
/usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
build-essential. XML::Parser does
Hi
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot
of documentation!
i can't share the installation scripts
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
your debian/copyright file accordingly.
Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of the
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL
Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
The package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
Hi
Hello.
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there
Linda:
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you are using
Thanks
i'va found a solution
i made link from files dirs postinst ... to package1.dirs
package1.postinst package2.dirs package2.postinst
that works but i thought there would exist a better solution.
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a crit:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.
Any other flaws? ;)
--
Dan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.
Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Linda:
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon. Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.
- Matt
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 19:41:27 +0400]:
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
I would like to
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
Build-Depends even.
/usr/bin/perl is
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one
Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
Sure.
rm debian/package/blah/fasel
in debian/rules after make install.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On , 2004-06-28 at 17:48 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the 'make
install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
the idea.
Okay
[Second attempt for seeking a sponsor]
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
The netdump client sets up the kernel to send crash dumps and/or
console messages as syslog packets to a remote system.
The netdump server listens to
On , 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave
* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright:
* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next
Greetings,
i am still looking a sponsor for package yaffa.
Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
Package name : yaffa
Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors : Anton Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net
Licence: GNU General
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
answer yet.
Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)
We are currently investigating. But our disks
Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
It is...
K.
--
Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
80 matches
Mail list logo
