On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:27:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
such that other distros don't have to deal with it. Also, that way
you can do a Debian
On Sunday 30 January 2005 21:27, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:17:56 +0100]:
This conf file is present in the DEB files, but after installation, it is
not being copied to the /etc/dibbler directory.
Try:
# dpkg --purge
* Achim Bohnet [Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:15:13 +0100]:
$ dpkg --force-help | grep confmiss
confmiss [!] Always install missing config files
So 1.5 points for me. 1 for the why (and 0.5 because it's faster
that purge and install ;)
Indeed! :)
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16
This is my second attempt at a Request for Sponsor, though admittedly,
after being on Debian-mentors a few weeks, I realize how lame my first
attempt was ( and thus probably why it merited no replies ).
This is a single binary package. It's small, lintian and linda clean, I
have the blessing
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:08:50AM -0500, Chris Sacca wrote:
This is a single binary package. It's small, lintian and linda clean, I
have the blessing of the upstream maintainer, and have filed and ITP (
#292667 ).
You don't close it in your changelog entry. That's wrong.
[...]
Thank you for your corrections, Bartosz.
[...] filed and ITP ( #292667 ).
You don't close it in your changelog entry. That's wrong.
Sorry, should have read the new maintainers' guide more closely. I
fixed this.
Hopefully someone will sponsor me, but if not, I would really appreciate
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At first glance autoreply looks very much like just another vacation
clone, but it takes the behavior of vacation and takes it to another
lever. The notable differences between autoreply and vacation are:
* As opposed to vacation that
Blars Blarson wrote, On 01/31/2005 06:40 PM:
[...]
In other words, this looks like yet another vaction clone by someone who
didn't bother to read the vacation man page. At least it sound like it
might not be another bad clone of vacation.
Does this mean you oppose to the inclusion of autoreply in
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, this looks like yet another vaction clone by someone who
didn't bother to read the vacation man page.
IMO, such judgments are not acceptable on public mailing-lists[1]. If
the upstream author felt like writing a program similar to
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Florent Rougon wrote:
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, this looks like yet another vaction clone by
someone who didn't bother to read the vacation man page.
IMO, such judgments are not acceptable on public
mailing-lists[1]. If the upstream author
You used a judgement to say judgements are not acceptable. Last time I
checked,
Debian did not have any opennings in the PC police department ;-)
Richard
P.S. PC (political correctness) for those hardcore geeks amongst us.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blars Blarson wrote, On 01/31/2005 06:40 PM:
[...]
In other words, this looks like yet another vaction clone by someone who
didn't bother to read the vacation man page. At least it sound like it
might not be another bad clone of
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 10:14, Blars Blarson wrote:
I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
Debian decides to add it to to their archives.
At least this sounds like it won't be one of the poorly done vacation
clones that does mailbombs.
I have a question. Is
Hi,
I'm trying to package a program named maserver (
http://www.babichev.info/en/projects/maserver/index.html
), which is an audio streaming server for LAN and
internet.
The file structure resulting from install (with some
tweaks) is right now:
Configuration files:
etc/maserver/*
Binary:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:31:27AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm trying to package a program named maserver (
http://www.babichev.info/en/projects/maserver/index.html
), which is an audio streaming server for LAN and
internet.
The file structure resulting from install (with some
tweaks) is
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:31:27AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
Hiya,
Now running lintian...
E: maserver:
sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib
usr/lib/libmaserver.so.1.0
Finished running lintian.
Try lintian -i: you'll see this type of thing:
A shared object was
It's true that you usually should not have shared
libraries in an
application package, but that is not the meaning of
this error. This error
means that the file that you have placed in /usr/lib
is *not a shared
library*. If the file does not declare an SONAME,
it's not a shared library
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 04:00:00AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
It's true that you usually should not have shared
libraries in an
application package, but that is not the meaning of
this error. This error
means that the file that you have placed in /usr/lib
is *not a shared
library*.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:30:27AM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 10:14, Blars Blarson wrote:
I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
Debian decides to add it to to their archives.
At least this sounds like it won't be one of the poorly
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free
and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder.
No.
Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages
in main must satisfy the
20 matches
Mail list logo
