Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Ilya M. Slepnev wrote:
You can download files here:
http://kastalia.cs.msu.su/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
Ilya, I could not access both of your links. Looks like the server is down.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RFS: sitecopy

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:27:06PM -0500,
Reed Snellenberger wrote, in some odd order:
 Philipp Kern wrote:
 
 On 23 Apr 2005, at 05:45, Reed Snellenberger wrote:
 
 Files are available at:
   http://home.houston.rr.com/snellenberger/debian/sitecopy/
 
 
 Do you know why there is an outdated debian/ subdirectory in the 
 upstream tarball?
 And if the current version of sitecopy does not work with the old 
 xsitecopy I would suggest a ``Conflicts: xsitecopy'' instead of the 
 versioned one.

 Philipp:
 
 Following up on my earlier post, upstream has asked what do you want me 
 to do about that old debian directory?, and I asked him to remove it.  
 Although it's still in place for the 0.15.1 version that he released on 
 Sunday (May 24), it'll be gone from subsequent releases.

Please reply below the text


What I missed in this thread

$ apt-cache show sitecopy
Package: sitecopy
Priority: extra
Section: web
Installed-Size: 456
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 1:0.11.4-6
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libssl0.9.7, libxml2 (= 2.5.0-1), zlib1g (= 
1:1.1.4)
Suggests: xsitecopy
Conflicts: xsitecopy ( 1:0.10.15-1)
Filename: pool/main/s/sitecopy/sitecopy_0.11.4-6_i386.deb
Size: 172196
MD5sum: 72e13e31b1ed7de8a0644bdb46a83811
Description: A program for managing a WWW site via FTP, DAV or HTTP
 sitecopy is for copying locally stored websites to remote ftp servers.
 With a single command, the program will synchronize a set of local files
 to a remote server by performing uploads and remote deletes as required.
 The aim is to remove the hassle of uploading and deleting individual files
 using an FTP client.  sitecopy will also optionally try to spot files you
 move locally, and move them remotely.
 .
 sitecopy is designed to not care about what is actually on the remote
 server - it simply keeps a record of what it THINKS is in on the remote
 server, and works from that.



Is this Request For Sponsor about _duplicate_ work?


Cheers
Geert Stappers



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:36:48AM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
 Hello,
 
 It seem that nobody has got interested in sponsoring AVInfo yet. Perhaps,
 my advertising was too pushing ;) Anyway, I have got a question I would
 like to ask. Is there any kind of testing buid system (maybe unofficial one),
 I mean something where I can upload my package to and try to compile
 it for platforms different from those I have access to
 (I can do it on i386 and on Sparc)?
 
 I do not mean pbuilder which I have installed locally. I mean something
 closer to a real Debian automatic build system. If there were such it would
 help a lot fighting against (possible) arch-related bugs.

Post in a follow-up message where to find the AVInfo work you did.
And see if you get any feedback like

  It compiles fine on $ARCH


 Just waiting and doing nothing does not seem very nice to me.

Imagion what information people need to help you.

(they have other things to do,
 then search the archive for your previous posting)

 
 Thanks,
 Stanislav


Cheers
Geert Stappers



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: sitecopy

2005-04-27 Thread Reed Snellenberger
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:27:06PM -0500,
Reed Snellenberger wrote, in some odd order:
 

Philipp Kern wrote:
   

On 23 Apr 2005, at 05:45, Reed Snellenberger wrote:
 

Files are available at:
http://home.houston.rr.com/snellenberger/debian/sitecopy/
   

Do you know why there is an outdated debian/ subdirectory in the 
upstream tarball?
And if the current version of sitecopy does not work with the old 
xsitecopy I would suggest a ``Conflicts: xsitecopy'' instead of the 
versioned one.
 

Philipp:
Following up on my earlier post, upstream has asked what do you want me 
to do about that old debian directory?, and I asked him to remove it.  
Although it's still in place for the 0.15.1 version that he released on 
Sunday (May 24), it'll be gone from subsequent releases.
   

Please reply below the text
 

Sorry about that... I didn't want this century to have gone by without 
having top-posted at least once :-(

What I missed in this thread
$ apt-cache show sitecopy
Package: sitecopy
Priority: extra
Section: web
Installed-Size: 456
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 1:0.11.4-6
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-1), libssl0.9.7, libxml2 (= 2.5.0-1), zlib1g (= 
1:1.1.4)
Suggests: xsitecopy
Conflicts: xsitecopy ( 1:0.10.15-1)
Filename: pool/main/s/sitecopy/sitecopy_0.11.4-6_i386.deb
Size: 172196
MD5sum: 72e13e31b1ed7de8a0644bdb46a83811
Description: A program for managing a WWW site via FTP, DAV or HTTP
sitecopy is for copying locally stored websites to remote ftp servers.
With a single command, the program will synchronize a set of local files
to a remote server by performing uploads and remote deletes as required.
The aim is to remove the hassle of uploading and deleting individual files
using an FTP client.  sitecopy will also optionally try to spot files you
move locally, and move them remotely.
.
sitecopy is designed to not care about what is actually on the remote
server - it simply keeps a record of what it THINKS is in on the remote
server, and works from that.

Is this Request For Sponsor about _duplicate_ work?
 

No -- I've taken over maintainership from Masayuki (1), and the original 
RFS (2) was for the then-current version of sitecopy (0.15.0). 

I've since packaged upstream's 0.15.1 release from last Sunday and 
replaced the older 0.15.0 deb on my storage site (3).  So... if anyone 
decides to sponsor the upload, it'll would be for sitecopy_0.15.1-1, not 
sitecopy_0.15.0-1 as originally RFS'd.

(1) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294991
(2) http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/04/msg00296.html
(3) http://home.houston.rr.com/snellenberger/debian/sitecopy/
--
Reed Snellenberger  
GPG KeyID: 5A978843  
rsnellenberger-at-houston.rr.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Geert Stappers wrote:
Post in a follow-up message where to find the AVInfo work you did.
And see if you get any feedback like
  It compiles fine on $ARCH
The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/
lintian-clean, builds in pbuilder w/o problems.
have been also checked by several people in #debian-mentors
(many thanks!) and corrected with respect to their comments.
If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
be even better ;-)
Imagion what information people need to help you.
(they have other things to do,
 then search the archive for your previous posting)
The original post is here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/04/msg00335.html
with a small correction which is here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/04/msg00336.html
The ITP is here
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306226
An example of avinfo-produced report is here
http://shounen.ru/list/hdd.shtml
Thanks,
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Jamie Jones
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
 If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
 will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
 be even better ;-)
 
Builds on amd64.

-- 
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x42E2C1E5
Fingerprint 3C77 9621 84C5 C32F D409 A38D A035 7E65 42E2 C1E5


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Ilya M. Slepnev
That's very strange.. Try please, follow link:

http://kastalia.cmc.msu.ru/~khext/debian/ysmv7/

or via IP:

http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/

It seems, that some ISP's doesn't manipulate .su domain correctly.

On 09:32 Wed 27 Apr , Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
 Ilya M. Slepnev wrote:
 
 
 You can download files here:
 http://kastalia.cs.msu.su/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
 
 
 Ilya, I could not access both of your links. Looks like the server is down.
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Ilya M. Slepnev aka KHEXT

I'm a signature virus. Please add me to Your signature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Ilya M. Slepnev wrote:
That's very strange.. Try please, follow link:
http://kastalia.cmc.msu.ru/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
Tried. This did not work (DNS error). A misprint in the url, perhaps?
or via IP:
http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
And this worked!
But actually, your old links worked for me now too.
So that was a temporary problem.
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Ilya,

* Ilya M. Slepnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 16:51]:
 That's very strange.. Try please, follow link:
 
 http://kastalia.cmc.msu.ru/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
 
 or via IP:
 
 http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/

Something is wrong with the dns entry. 
Looking up kastalia.cmc.msu.ru
Unable to locate remote host kastalia.cmc.msu.ru.

With the ip address specified it works!
Regards NicRegards Nicoo
-- 
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred


pgp4QkDjo56uH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)

2005-04-27 Thread Beverly Davis
Greetings,

I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils.  This is a collection of
simple command-line utilities developed at the W3C for manipulating HTML
and XML files.  I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_
to try to avoid name conflicts.  The package is lintian clean.  I have
contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
available as a Debian package.

You can get the package at:
http://merlin.nmt.edu/debian/html-xml-utils/

WNPP:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=164125

For more information see:
http://www.w3.org/Tools/HTML-XML-utils/

Package: html-xml-utils
Version: 3.6
Section: web
Priority: optional
License: W3C Software Notice and License
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
Description: utilities for manipulating HTML and XML files
 A number of simple programs for manipulating HTML and XML: number 
 headings, make a table of contents, make an index, manage bibliographic 
 references (a simple implementation of refer(1) for HTML), list all 
 links, create cross-references, extract elements that match a (CSS) 
 selector, etc. Most are meant to be used in a Unix pipe or in shell 
 scripts.

Thanks.


Regards,
Beverly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
 Geert Stappers wrote:
 
 Post in a follow-up message where to find the AVInfo work you did.
 And see if you get any feedback like
 
   It compiles fine on $ARCH
 
 The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/
 lintian-clean, builds in pbuilder w/o problems.
 have been also checked by several people in #debian-mentors
 (many thanks!) and corrected with respect to their comments.
 
 If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
 will help me a lot!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~//avinfo-1.0.a15
$ fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is avinfo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.0.a15-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Stanislav Maslovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is powerpc
 debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
cd src  /usr/bin/make clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
rm -f var.o config.o ass.tab.o avinfo.o common.o riff.o mpeg.o text.o
codec.o ifo.o ogm.o mkv.o print.o
rm -f ass.output ass.tab.* tpls conv avinfo
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
dh_clean
 dpkg-source -b avinfo-1.0.a15
dpkg-source: building avinfo using existing avinfo_1.0.a15.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building avinfo in avinfo_1.0.a15-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: warning: file README has no final newline (either original
or modified version)
dpkg-source: building avinfo in avinfo_1.0.a15-1.dsc
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
cd src  /usr/bin/make
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
gcc -c  var.c
gcc  c_conv2.c -o conv
./conv tpls.ass tpls
gcc -c  config.c
config.c:41:52: warning: backslash and newline separated by space
bison -d -v ass.y
ass.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
gcc -c  ass.tab.c
gcc -c  avinfo.c
gcc -c  common.c
gcc -c  riff.c
gcc -c   mpeg.c
gcc -c   text.c
text.c: In function `textparse':
text.c:42: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of
data typetext.c:43: warning: comparison is always true due to limited
range of data type
gcc -c  codec.c
gcc -c  ifo.c
gcc -c  ogm.c
gcc -c  mkv.c
mkv.c:28:1: warning: BUFFER_SIZE redefined
In file included from avinfo.h:75,
 from mkv.h:29,
 from mkv.c:27:
ass.h:42:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
gcc -c  print.c
print.c: In function `PrintVarToLineCache':
print.c:292: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
gcc var.o config.o ass.tab.o avinfo.o common.o riff.o mpeg.o text.o
codec.o ifo.o ogm.o mkv.o print.o -o avinfo
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
touch build-stamp
 debian/rules binary
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/avinfo.
/usr/bin/make install
DESTDIR=/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/debian/avinfo
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
cd src  /usr/bin/make
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
make[2]: `avinfo' is up to date.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/src'
install -m 755 -o root -g root ./src/avinfo
/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15/debian/avinfo/usr/bin
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/stappers//avinfo-1.0.a15'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs CHANGELOG
dh_installdocs
dh_installman src/avinfo.1
dh_strip
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
dh_shlibdeps
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: building package `avinfo' in
`../avinfo_1.0.a15-1_powerpc.deb'.
 dpkg-genchanges
dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
dpkg-buildpackage: full upload (original source is included)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~//avinfo-1.0.a15


 If somebody decides to sponsor it that will be even better ;-)
 


Here was something like 

  I don't know what to next, so I wait (and make some noise)

 Imagion what information people need to help you.
 
 (they have other things to do,
  then search the archive for your previous posting)
 
 The original post is here
   [ several URLs ]

Thanks for telling.
My hint (my rant?) was to tell that you wrongly assumed
that all your previous postings have been seen by us

Make threads stand alone


Cheers
Geert Stappers



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: html-xml-utils, License: W3C Software Notice and License

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
 Greetings,
 

  snip/

 
 Package: html-xml-utils
 Version: 3.6
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 License: W3C Software Notice and License
 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231

How does that comply with DFSG?

 Description: utilities for manipulating HTML and XML files
  A number of simple programs for manipulating HTML and XML: number 
  headings, make a table of contents, make an index, manage bibliographic 
  references (a simple implementation of refer(1) for HTML), list all 
  links, create cross-references, extract elements that match a (CSS) 
  selector, etc. Most are meant to be used in a Unix pipe or in shell 
  scripts.
 
 Thanks.
 
 
 Regards,
 Beverly

Cheers
Geert Stappers



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils.  This is a collection of
 simple command-line utilities developed at the W3C for manipulating HTML
 and XML files.  I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_
 to try to avoid name conflicts.  The package is lintian clean.  I have
 contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
 available as a Debian package.

What thinks upstream of the  hx_  prefix?


Cheers
Geert Stappers



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: build test

2005-04-27 Thread Jamie Jones
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:23 +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
 On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:54 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
  If somebody tests it on archs different from i386 or Sparc it
  will help me a lot! If somebody decides to sponsor it that will
  be even better ;-)
  
 Builds on amd64.
 
Oops. Forgot to attach the build log earlier.

-- 
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x42E2C1E5
Fingerprint 3C77 9621 84C5 C32F D409 A38D A035 7E65 42E2 C1E5
Script started on Wed 27 Apr 2005 15:58:18 UTC
]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /home/jamie/avinfo(devel_ubuntu_hoary_amd64)[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:~/avinfo# sudo pbuilder build avinfo_1.0.a15-1.dsc
W: /home/jamie/.pbuilderrc does not exist
I: using fakeroot in build.
pbuilder-buildpackage/amd64 $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs,v 1.15 2005/01/04 
01:47:18 dancer Exp $
$Id: pbuilder-buildpackage,v 1.110 2005/01/04 01:47:18 dancer Exp $

Current time: Wed Apr 27 15:58:29 UTC 2005
pbuilder-time-stamp: 1114617509
Building the build Environment
 - extracting base tarball 
[/home/jamie/chroots/pbuilder/ubuntu-hoary-amd64/base.tar.gz]
 - creating local configuration
 - copying local configuration
 - mounting /proc filesystem
 - mounting /dev/pts filesystem
 - policy-rc.d already exists
 - created buildresult dir 
:/home/jamie/chroots/pbuilder/ubuntu-hoary-amd64/result/
Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
Installing the build-deps
 - Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.18 
2003/04/20 03:40:36 dancer Exp $
 - Considering  debhelper (= 4.0.0)
   - Trying debhelper
 - Considering  bison
   - Trying bison
 - Installing  debhelper bison

Reading package lists... 0%
Reading package lists... 100%
Reading package lists... Done

Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  debconf-utils file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libmagic1 
m4 po-debconf
Suggested packages:
  dh-make cvs gettext-doc
Recommended packages:
  libmail-sendmail-perl
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  bison debconf-utils debhelper file gettext gettext-base html2text 
intltool-debian libmagic1 m4 po-debconf
0 upgraded, 11 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/3310kB of archives.
After unpacking 10.9MB of additional disk space will be used.

debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
Selecting previously deselected package libmagic1.
(Reading database ... 8075 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libmagic1 (from .../libmagic1_4.12-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package file.
Unpacking file (from .../archives/file_4.12-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base.
Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.14.1-6_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package m4.
Unpacking m4 (from .../archives/m4_1.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package bison.
Unpacking bison (from .../bison_1%3a1.875d-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package debconf-utils.
Unpacking debconf-utils (from .../debconf-utils_1.4.42ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package html2text.
Unpacking html2text (from .../html2text_1.3.2a-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gettext.
Unpacking gettext (from .../gettext_0.14.1-6_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package intltool-debian.
Unpacking intltool-debian (from .../intltool-debian_0.30+20040213_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package po-debconf.
Unpacking po-debconf (from .../po-debconf_0.8.17_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package debhelper.
Unpacking debhelper (from .../debhelper_4.2.28ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
Setting up libmagic1 (4.12-1) ...

Setting up file (4.12-1) ...
Setting up gettext-base (0.14.1-6) ...

Setting up m4 (1.4.2-1) ...

Setting up bison (1.875d-1) ...

Setting up debconf-utils (1.4.42ubuntu4) ...

Setting up html2text (1.3.2a-1) ...

Setting up gettext (0.14.1-6) ...

Setting up intltool-debian (0.30+20040213) ...
Setting up po-debconf (0.8.17) ...
Setting up debhelper (4.2.28ubuntu4) ...
 - Finished parsing the build-deps

Reading package lists... 0%
Reading package lists... 0%
Reading package lists... 94%
Reading package lists... Done

Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree... 50%
Building dependency tree... Done
gnupg is already the newest version.
devscripts is already the newest version.
sudo is already the newest version.
fakeroot is already the newest version.
fakeroot is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Copying back the cached apt archive contents
Copying source file
- copying [avinfo_1.0.a15-1.dsc]
- copying [./avinfo_1.0.a15.orig.tar.gz]

Re: html-xml-utils, License: W3C Software Notice and License

2005-04-27 Thread Beverly Davis
[My apologizes, Geert, I meant to reply to the list in the first place.]

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:57:28 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
  Package: html-xml-utils
  Version: 3.6
  Section: web
  Priority: optional
  License: W3C Software Notice and License
  http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231

 How does that comply with DFSG?

I'm new to this, but I think that it does comply.  It is quite similar
to the BSD lisence which is explicitly stated to comply with the DFSG.

Besides the license itself, here's some more information that might
help.

Amaya (the W3C's HTML editor and browser) is released under a very
similar license (an old version of the same) and is in Debian main.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/amaya

The W3C claims that it's an OSI certified
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/W3C.php
and GPL compatible
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses

The W3C provides a FAQ about their licenses which might help
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-2620#Software

The only thing I wondered about is the non-advertising clause.  Is this
a problem?


  Description: utilities for manipulating HTML and XML files
   A number of simple programs for manipulating HTML and XML: number
   headings, make a table of contents, make an index, manage bibliographic
   references (a simple implementation of refer(1) for HTML), list all
   links, create cross-references, extract elements that match a (CSS)
   selector, etc. Most are meant to be used in a Unix pipe or in shell
   scripts.

 Cheers
 Geert Stappers


Regards,
Beverly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)

2005-04-27 Thread Beverly Davis
[Again, Geert, I meant to reply to the list.  Sorry.  I'll get this down
sooner or later.]

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:58:51 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
  Greetings,
 
  I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils.  This is a collection of
  simple command-line utilities developed at the W3C for manipulating HTML
  and XML files.  I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_
  to try to avoid name conflicts.  The package is lintian clean.  I have
  contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
  available as a Debian package.

 What thinks upstream of the  hx_  prefix?

Prefixing the programs' names was mentioned in the upstream TODO file.
hx_ was the prefix suggested.

 Cheers
 Geert Stappers

Regards,
Beverly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: html-xml-utils, License: W3C Software Notice and License

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:44:20AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote,
in a off-list message:
 On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:57:28 +0200, Geert Stappers
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
   Package: html-xml-utils
   Version: 3.6
   Section: web
   Priority: optional
   License: W3C Software Notice and License
   http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
  
  How does that comply with DFSG?
 
 I'm new to this, but I think that it does comply.  It is quite similar
 to the BSD lisence which is explictly stated to comply with the DFSG.
 
 Besides the license itself, here's some more information that might
 help.
 
 Amaya (the W3C's HTML editor and browser) is released under a very
 similar license (an old version of the same) and is in Debian main.
 http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/amaya
 
 The W3C claims that it's an OSI certified
 http://www.opensource.org/licenses/W3C.php
 and GPL compatible
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
 
 The W3C provides a FAQ about their licenses which might help
 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-2620#Software
 
 The only thing I wondered about is the non-advertising clause.  Is this
 a problem? 

This message is now back on -mentors
Here are more eye-balls, but it could be, that you have to ask
debian-legal@lists.debian.org  (please avoid cross-posting)
for advice on non-advertising clause


Cheers
Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)

2005-04-27 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:46:56AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
in an off-list message

 On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:58:51 +0200, Geert Stappers
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
   Greetings,
   
   I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils.  This is a collection of
   simple command-line utilities developed at the W3C for manipulating HTML
   and XML files.  I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_
   to try to avoid name conflicts.  The package is lintian clean.  I have
   contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
   available as a Debian package.
  
  What thinks upstream of the  hx_  prefix?
 
 Prefixing the programs' names was mentioned in the upstream TODO file. 
 hx_ was the prefix suggested.

Nice.

Have you provide them with the work you did on hx_ prefixing?



Cheers
Geert Stappers
How is considering sponsoring this package



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: html-xml-utils, License: W3C Software Notice and License

2005-04-27 Thread Beverly Davis

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:11:57 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:44:20AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote,
 in a off-list message:
  On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:57:28 +0200, Geert Stappers
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
Package: html-xml-utils
Version: 3.6
Section: web
Priority: optional
License: W3C Software Notice and License
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
   
   How does that comply with DFSG?
  
  I'm new to this, but I think that it does comply.  It is quite similar
  to the BSD lisence which is explictly stated to comply with the DFSG.
  
  Besides the license itself, here's some more information that might
  help.
  
  Amaya (the W3C's HTML editor and browser) is released under a very
  similar license (an old version of the same) and is in Debian main.
  http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/amaya
  
  The W3C claims that it's an OSI certified
  http://www.opensource.org/licenses/W3C.php
  and GPL compatible
  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
  
  The W3C provides a FAQ about their licenses which might help
  http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-2620#Software
  
  The only thing I wondered about is the non-advertising clause.  Is this
  a problem? 
 
 This message is now back on -mentors
 Here are more eye-balls, but it could be, that you have to ask
 debian-legal@lists.debian.org  (please avoid cross-posting)
 for advice on non-advertising clause

I searched the mailinglist archives and found that someone had already
asked about this license.  The one response they got said that it looked
DFSG-free.  
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01696.html

 
 Cheers
 Geert Stappers
 

Regards,
Beverly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
Ilya M. Slepnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 First of all, it is a nice, small, with clear interface, full of humor
 client. It doesn't depend on any ncurses, as centericq. Ok, I
 understand, that many people think about console clients as becomed
 obsolete and not so featured. This client includes all standart
 features, and simplicity of console utils. I am using this client with
 screen program, and it looks powerfull.

 ldd ysm
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4002f000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40044000)
libreadline.so.5 = /lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x40095000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400c3000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
libncurses.so.5 = /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x401f6000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4024f000)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: html-xml-utils (W3C simple HTML and XML utilities)

2005-04-27 Thread Beverly Davis

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:28:06 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:46:56AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
 in an off-list message
 
  On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:58:51 +0200, Geert Stappers
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
Greetings,

I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils.  This is a collection of
simple command-line utilities developed at the W3C for manipulating HTML
and XML files.  I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_
to try to avoid name conflicts.  The package is lintian clean.  I have
contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
available as a Debian package.
   
   What thinks upstream of the  hx_  prefix?
  
  Prefixing the programs' names was mentioned in the upstream TODO file. 
  hx_ was the prefix suggested.
 
 Nice.
 
 Have you provide them with the work you did on hx_ prefixing?

I did let them know and tell them where they could see my changes a
while ago, but I haven't heard back from them yet.

 
 Cheers
 Geert Stappers
 How is considering sponsoring this package
 

Regards,
Beverly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Ilya M. Slepnev
Hi,
On 19:15 Wed 27 Apr, Thomas Dickey wrote:
  ldd ysm
 libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4002f000)
 libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40044000)
 libreadline.so.5 = /lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x40095000)
 libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400c3000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
 libncurses.so.5 = /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x401f6000)
 libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4024f000)

That's very strange... Is that log a log for my package?! May be, you have 
compiled this with ncurses
support?!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] s (2) ~/ysm/debian
$ ldd /usr/bin/ysm
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40022000)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40037000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40088000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)

Here are logs for centericq (for example):

[EMAIL PROTECTED] s (2) ~/ysm/debian
$ ldd /usr/bin/centericq
libcurl.so.3 = /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 (0x40022000)
libidn.so.11 = /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0x40054000)
libssl.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/i586/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x40084000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 = /usr/lib/i586/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x400b1000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4019e000)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x401a2000)
libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x401b4000)
libncurses.so.5 = /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x401d2000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40211000)
libgnutls-openssl.so.11 = /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.11 (0x40226000)
libstdc++.so.5 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4022d000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x402e8000)
libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4030a000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40313000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
libgnutls.so.11 = /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11 (0x40446000)
libtasn1.so.2 = /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2 (0x404ac000)
libgcrypt.so.11 = /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0x404bd000)
libgpg-error.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x4050a000)

Feel the difference!-)
Also, I can't imagine, where, in source, it can use ncurses...

I understand, that this is an important point, but the main idea of
difference ysm from centericq is not using or not ncurces, but style of
interface, which (for ysm) is looking like micq in some way.

--
Ilya M. Slepnev aka KHEXT

I'm a signature virus. Please add me to Your signature.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: YSM ICQ client

2005-04-27 Thread Ilya M. Slepnev
Hi Nico,

That's realy something strange... Stas told just now, that everything
becomed OK. God knows, what is going on with that russian dns'...

So, here are the _working_ links:

for download:
http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/

for APT: 
deb http://158.250.11.100/ debian/

So, can you say anything about package itself?


On 17:00 Wed 27 Apr , Nico Golde wrote:
 Hello Ilya,
 
 * Ilya M. Slepnev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 16:51]:
  That's very strange.. Try please, follow link:
  
  http://kastalia.cmc.msu.ru/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
  
  or via IP:
  
  http://158.250.11.100/~khext/debian/ysmv7/
 
 Something is wrong with the dns entry. 
 Looking up kastalia.cmc.msu.ru
 Unable to locate remote host kastalia.cmc.msu.ru.
 
 With the ip address specified it works!
 Regards NicRegards Nicoo
 -- 
 Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
 http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
 VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
 and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred



-- 
Ilya M. Slepnev aka KHEXT

I'm a signature virus. Please add me to Your signature.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature