Hi
I uploaded aldo-0.7.0-3 on mentors.debian.net.
Could you upload in debian this new version of the package?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 20:42 -0400, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
I plan to keep a single changelog entry until package is officially
issued. Is this ok ? As a side effect, using -v wouldn't be required.
This is ok, but, I don't think mentors.debian.net allows you to
re-upload the same version.
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Re: Eddy Petrişor in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ?
changelog:
remove the [ ] part
done
Hi Mentors,
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
kde-icons-nuvola
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-icons-nuvola.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/nuvola/
This upload is mainly for QA. If you've followed my last RFS for
kde-icons-nuvoext you might know my rules file was *very*
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Monday 17 October 2005 23:15, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hehe, I guess my package is relatively perfect (and uploaded) now ;)
The $(CURDIR) is redundant in dh_installchangelogs. But I won't harass
you with that any more. :)
But one last question. What if upstream
On 10/18/05, Nicolai Ehemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
get an ITP and insert it here
not done yet, as I want to have the package fully prepared, then I
want to upload it.
I think you missed the sense of an ITP bug: it is intended to be
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Jerome Martin wrote:
However, I am seeking advice on how to do it / which list to post on /
which people to contact in order not to mess up with somebody's else's
work (i.e. vlan package also contain ifupdown hooks, however not
directly supporting bondX.Y
Hello,
First of all, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to read my email
an answer it.
Loïc Minier wrote:
Documentation on joining the project or helping the project is
available at:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
http://www.debian.org/devel/
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Jerome Martin wrote:
Well, I am a bit surprised by the way you see it. Could you be more
specific ?
Of course: what I meant is that the issues you might have encountered
require fixing, and not documentation. I can't tell how much of what
you describe is currently
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Jerome Martin wrote:
Well, I am a bit surprised by the way you see it. Could you be more
specific ?
Of course: what I meant is that the issues you might have encountered
require fixing, and not documentation. I can't tell how much of what
you
Hi, Justin
I did it.
now my php-imagick source generates php4-imagick and php5-imagick debs.
I uploaded and source is NEW.
What I need to do now ?
Thanks
Jose Carlos
Renaming the source package will force you to go through the new queue
again, afaik. You can just change the package name
Hello.
Im packaging urlgfe,an some others,when i run Linda over the package
it gives me 2 warnings about shared libraries,here is the output
linda -Di *.changes
W: urlgfe; Shared object /usr/bin/urlgfe is linked with version 0.9.8
and 0.9.7 of libcrypto.
The binary object shown above links
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:55:38PM -0200, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
Hi, Justin
I did it.
now my php-imagick source generates php4-imagick and php5-imagick debs.
I uploaded and source is NEW.
What I need to do now ?
Just wait until it is approved. The NEW faq indicates that the
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:13:16PM -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote:
Hello.
Im packaging urlgfe,an some others,when i run Linda over the package
it gives me 2 warnings about shared libraries,here is the output
linda -Di *.changes
W: urlgfe; Shared object /usr/bin/urlgfe is linked with
Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2005, 14:13 -0400 schrieb -.JavaManiac.-:
Im packaging urlgfe,an some others,when i run Linda over the package
it gives me 2 warnings about shared libraries,here is the output
linda -Di *.changes
W: urlgfe; Shared object /usr/bin/urlgfe is linked with version 0.9.8
[ I suggest me move the discussion off-list, as it's now quite OT :) ]
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Jerome Martin wrote:
That's useful indeed. That would be another round of fixes for the
bonding if-up scripts.
Mmmhh ... are there already any bonding if-up scripts ? If so, I don't
know in which
Hello,
I am packaging tikiwiki, and want to use dbconfig-common for the
database configuration. I followed the instructions in the documentation
and looked at the examples, but it still yelling rude things at me.
First I installed my package and said NO to the first question, about
whether
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 10:24, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
dh_install 128x128 16x16 22x22 32x32 48x48
kde-icons-nuvola
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-icons-nuvola.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/nuvola/
As usual I have found something to
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 10:24, Bastian Venthur wrote:
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
kde-icons-crystalclear
+ http://venthur.de/debian/crystalclear/
closes: #322161
+ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322161
* Package name: kde-icons-crystalclear
Just wondering about packaging snapshots of a package.
Ok, snapshots could be known as backups. Here I am talking about
pulling from say a Subversion repository and building a package.
For now I want to do this just to keep tabs on what upstream has
planned. Not so much for unstable...
I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:37:14AM +1000, Kai Hendry wrote:
Just wondering about packaging snapshots of a package.
Ok, snapshots could be known as backups. Here I am talking about
pulling from say a Subversion repository and building a package.
For now I want to do this just to keep tabs
Hello,
I made my yum debian package, and when passing it to 'lintian -i',
It finds that many *.py files are not executable.
I am not really sure where should I make the chmod into the rules file.
would you help me?
I join the rules file (but tell me if you need more to help me).
Thank you.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:07:38AM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I made my yum debian package, and when passing it to 'lintian -i',
It finds that many *.py files are not executable.
I am not really sure where should I make the chmod into the rules
file. would you help me?
On 19-Oct-2005, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
I made my yum debian package, and when passing it to 'lintian -i',
It finds that many *.py files are not executable.
This seems backwards.
If a file is meant to be executable, the convention is to name it
*without* a suffix (so that it can be
Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you might want to use the new Archticture: all packaging variant,
see for example #319675, otherwise you need to Provides:
aspell6-dictionary
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I made my yum debian package, and when passing it to 'lintian -i',
It finds that many *.py files are not executable.
I am not really sure where should I make the chmod into the rules file.
would you help me?
I join the rules file (but tell me if you need
26 matches
Mail list logo
