Package: windowlab
Short Description: Small and simple Amiga-like window manager
Version Packaged: 1.33-2
Version in Debian: 1.33-1
WindowLab is a Window Manager for the X Window System. Features include
click-to-focus, a simple menu/taskbar combination and integration with Debian
menu system.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:11:27 +0100, Daniel Knabl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Einst schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* postinst is sometimes called with other values (*not* only
configure). Though these are perfectly OK, your postinst script will
fail.
Could you describe what you
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:44:47 +0100 schrieb Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How many times have you been pointed to Debian policy?
Do you mean after I already read it? Then the answer is too many
times...
And you are still asking questions that neatly show that you didn't
read it? And that also
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:30:22PM -0800, Stan Vasilyev wrote:
From the last e-mail I got from Thierry it looks like he wants to make a
compromise. Since I annoyed him so much with my e-mails, he proposed to start
releasing Xdialog in two versions: Xdialog-version.tar.bz2 file with debian
This one time, at band camp, Daniel Knabl said:
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:44:47 +0100 schrieb Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How many times have you been pointed to Debian policy?
Do you mean after I already read it? Then the answer is too many
times...
And you are still asking questions
отправлено в группы и по почте
Christoph Haas wrote:
- Please close the WNPP bug 273204 which you opened yourself
one and a half year ago.
Ok, i'll close it.
I assumed though that ITP should be closed after that the package was
become ready and was appeared in the pool. I'm i wrong?
Am Donnerstag, den 26.01.2006, 19:30 -0800 schrieb Stan Vasilyev:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:14, Stan Vasilyev wrote:
I have a situation with a Debian package xdialog:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xdialog.html
The upstream author, Thierry Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED], insists on
Daniel Knabl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main target in postinst, when someone initially installs the
software, is configure,
No, not only upon initially installing it. On every upgrade.
and in postrm, when someone purges it, it is
purge.
No, if the package is purged, postrm is called
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:37:42 + schrieb Stephen Gran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Disclaimer: I have not looked at your packaging.
The standard way to do this sort of thing is look through the
reference for all the arguments your script can be called with, and
handle them.
so something like:
I have created my own custom Debian installer CD based on the debian
net-inst cd image. I modified the local repository to include some
additional packages I would like to have installed by default. I then
reburned the iso and installed the system. Everything works perfectly
until I try to install
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060126 17:16]:
I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG.
Files can be obtained from:
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/optipng/ and it will close
ITP #347993.
I won't sponser it myself, as I do not understand cdbs, but some hints:
It does
Daniel Knabl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main target in postinst, when someone initially installs the
software, is configure, and in postrm, when someone purges it, it is
purge. For these two targets I found examples by looking at some
other packages (phpmyadmin, album, ...) that do very
Hello,
I need a sponsor for pyme package. My previous sponsor doesn't have the
time currently to review the package i have made.
* Package name: pyme
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Igor Belyi belyi.users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pyme/
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:27:09 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes. The problem is that the Debian policy specifies other targets in
the maintainer script. Normally, most people don't implement them and
do a 'abort-upgrade|bla|baz) #do nothing'. You don't do so, your
Hello,
You can look at debian/passwd.config in the passwd package for a solution
written in perl.
Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you please build your package as nonnative, and preferrably
pristine? Otherwise I don't know where to start looking at your work.
nonnative means that an .orig.tar.gz of the expected name exists in
the parent directory, and pristine means that the tarball is identical
to upstreams (not
Hi, there
I'm seekig for new sponsor of existing package.
Package: proxycheck
Description: checks existence of open proxy
License: GPL
URL: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/proxycheck.html
Upstream Author: Michael Tokarev
proxycheck is a simple tool that will work on a reasonable *nix system
and may be
Al Nikolov wrote:
Excuse me, forgot link to
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proxycheck/
--
Regards,
Al Nikolov
JID [EMAIL PROTECTED]IRC clown UIN 312108671
PGP 4B50 F1E3 080C 21A2 91F4 8BF0 CD60 3B5A 2ECF 984B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:24:49 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could you please build your package as nonnative, and preferrably
pristine? Otherwise I don't know where to start looking at your work.
nonnative means that an .orig.tar.gz of the expected name exists in
the parent
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:09:56PM +0100, Daniel Knabl wrote:
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:24:49 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could you please build your package as nonnative, and preferrably
pristine? Otherwise I don't know where to start looking at your work.
nonnative
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:21:47 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thats not a sufficient reason to repack the tarball; it is more
important that it is pristine (if applicable). Perhaps the clean
target can remove them, and then you don't have to look at them nearly
as much (instead, the dpkg:
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:08:38 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nearly all Debian packages should be pristine; if you can do that, you
should. If upstream *only* exists in CVS, then you can't really, and
you can run that command before creating your orig tarball. If
upstream has a real
Hi,
I know it is not question for this group, but maybe I would love to know
what will happen to me, if I will behave as a maintainer of wvdial, which
let bug# 316575 without response for 210 days :-).
Thanks a lot for the answer,
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/
GPG
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:18:42PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I know it is not question for this group, but maybe I would love to know
what will happen to me, if I will behave as a maintainer of wvdial, which
let bug# 316575 without response for 210 days :-).
This is the realm of the QA
Matej Cepl wrote:
I know it is not question for this group, but maybe I would love to know
what will happen to me, if I will behave as a maintainer of wvdial, which
let bug# 316575 without response for 210 days :-).
You could send a (friendly) reminder and inquiry to the bug report
([EMAIL
25 matches
Mail list logo
